IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v2y2017i3p18-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure Projects Viable: Private Choices, Public Support, and Systems Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Noonan

    (School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University—Purdue University Indianapolis, USA)

  • Shan Zhou

    (School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA)

  • Robert Kirkman

    (School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA)

Abstract

Sustainable cities will require major infrastructure investments coupled with widespread behavioral change. Examples of smart, green technologies abound, but evidence for actual use lags. This partly owes to the tension between public support and private choices: individuals thinking as members of the public may see solutions as smart for the city, but thinking of their private interests may see those same solutions as not smart for themselves. This also owes to the disconnect between private and public choices, on the one hand, and the workings of complex systems, on the other. Even if public and private interests align, existing built environment systems may resist change. This article examines public perception and use of the Atlanta BeltLine, a pioneering sustainability initiative to transform the auto-dependent city into a greener, denser city. Analyzing a general public survey reveals widespread support for the BeltLine alongside reticence from residents to change their commute or greenspace use. The findings also show that drivers of public support and prospective use of the BeltLine differ. Public support may be insufficient if individual use decisions do not follow. Yet, private adoption decisions may not follow until and unless the systems in which they are embedded are already changing.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Noonan & Shan Zhou & Robert Kirkman, 2017. "Making Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure Projects Viable: Private Choices, Public Support, and Systems Constraints," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 18-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:3:p:18-32
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v2i3.999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/999
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v2i3.999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Florida & Charlotta Mellander & Peter J. Rentfrow, 2013. "The Happiness of Cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 613-627, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    2. Fredrik Carlsen & Stefan Leknes, 2022. "For whom are cities good places to live?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2177-2190, December.
    3. Ruoshui He & Jonna Rickardsson & Charlotta Mellander, 2024. "Geography, age, and wellbeing following the COVID-19 shock," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1959-1994, December.
    4. Lucia Petrikovičová & Victoria Kurilenko & Amantius Akimjak & Beáta Akimjaková & Peter Majda & Anton Ďatelinka & Yulia Biryukova & Ľubomír Hlad & Peter Kondrla & Daliborka Maryanovich & Lyubov Ippolit, 2022. "Is the Size of the City Important for the Quality of Urban Life? Comparison of a Small and a Large City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Ugo Rossi & Arturo Di Bella, 2017. "Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 999-1018, May.
    6. Karen Maguire & John V. Winters, 0. "Satisfaction and Self-employment: Do Men or Women Benefit More from Being Their Own Boss?," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    7. Douglas Noonan & Shan Zhou & Robert Kirkman, 2017. "Making Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure Projects Viable: Private Choices, Public Support, and Systems Constraints," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 18-32.
    8. Rickardsson, Jonna & Mellander, Charlotta, 2017. "Absolute vs Relative Income and Life Satisfaction," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 451, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    9. Xiangdan Piao & Xinxin Ma & Shunsuke Managi, 2021. "Impact of the Intra-household Education Gap on Wives’ and Husbands’ Well-Being: Evidence from Cross-Country Microdata," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 111-136, July.
    10. Liping Liao & Wenjie Wu & Chenglei Zhang, 2022. "Housing prices and the subjective well-being of migrant workers: evidence from China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3363-3388, October.
    11. Phil Lignier & Diane Jarvis & Daniel Grainger & Taha Chaiechi, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Subjective Wellbeing: Exploring the Role of Social Capital in Metropolitan Areas Using Multilevel Modelling," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Qian Xu & Zhe Hou & Chao Zhang & Feng Yu & Tong Li, 2022. "Career Capital and Well-Being: A Configurational Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-10, August.
    13. Hooijen, Inge & Cörvers, Frank, 2020. "Living preferences of STEM workers in a high-tech business park of a peripheral region," ROA Research Memorandum 007, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    14. Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn, 2013. "City Life: Rankings (Livability) Versus Perceptions (Satisfaction)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 433-451, January.
    15. Sun Youn Lee & Fumio Ohtake, 2021. "How Conscious Are You of Others? Further Evidence on Relative Income and Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 3321-3356, December.
    16. Jing Zou & Xiaojun Deng, 2021. "The complex association between migrants’ residential community choice and subjective well‐being: Evidence from urban China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1652-1679, September.
    17. Saskia Sassen & Karima Kourtit, 2021. "A Post-Corona Perspective for Smart Cities: ‘ Should I Stay or Should I Go ?’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Grazyna Karmowska & Andrzej Sobczyk, 2020. "Analysis of Szczecin Metropolitan Area’s Growth Potential," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 931-946.
    19. Lincoln R Larson & Viniece Jennings & Scott A Cloutier, 2016. "Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Scott Cloutier & Alex Karner & Hanna L. Breetz & Parinaz Toufani & Nuri Onat & Sambhram Patel & Siddhanth Paralkar & Erica Berejnoi & Beth Ann Morrison & Jason Papenfuss & A. Davieau Briggs & Cynthia , 2017. "Measures of a Sustainable Commute as a Predictor of Happiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:3:p:18-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.