IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v12y2024a7787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusion or Exclusion? The Spatial Habitus of Rural Gentrifiers

Author

Listed:
  • Kyra Tomay

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Pécs, Hungary)

  • Viktor Berger

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Pécs, Hungary)

Abstract

Several rural areas all over the world have experienced the inflow of the urban better‐off. This rural gentrification takes various temporary and permanent forms, i.e., lifestyle migration, second‐home ownership, or short‐term visitors. Scholarly interest in rural gentrification is evidenced by the growing body of literature. Based on 105 semi‐structured in‐depth interviews conducted in two rural areas in Hungary, this article aims to explore the perceptions, motivations, preferences, and lived experiences of rural newcomers, their position within the community, as well as processes of inclusion and exclusion. We rely on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of habitus and argue that it includes distinct spatial dispositions forming a “spatial habitus.” The interviews show that the middle‐class rural gentrifiers’ (spatial) habitus is entangled with their cultural capital and represents a mixture of urban and “ruralising” dispositions. Their spatial practices are interpreted as the result of middle‐class (spatial) habitus and middle‐class symbolic distinction. At the same time, middle‐class rural gentrifiers are active local agents who defy common notions of newcomers having to integrate into their communities of choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyra Tomay & Viktor Berger, 2024. "Inclusion or Exclusion? The Spatial Habitus of Rural Gentrifiers," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v12:y:2024:a:7787
    DOI: 10.17645/si.7787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7787
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.7787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Bourdieu, 2018. "Social Space and the Genesis of Appropriated Physical Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 106-114, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ingeborg C. Kroese, 2023. "Sex/gender‐blind training maintains and creates inequity," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 917-936, May.
    2. Caleb Gallemore & Kristian Roed Nielsen & Kristjan Jespersen, 2019. "The uneven geography of crowdfunding success: Spatial capital on Indiegogo," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(6), pages 1389-1406, September.
    3. Oliver Wieczorek & Melanie Malzahn, 2024. "Exploring an extinct society through the lens of Habitus-Field theory and the Tocharian text corpus," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Helena Gutmane, 2023. "A Bourdieusian Framework for Understanding Public Space Heritage Transformations: Riga’s Castle Square," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 121-136.
    5. J. Grant Stauffer & Seth B. Grooms & Lorraine W. Hu & Joy Mersmann & Tristram R. Kidder & Edward R. Henry, 2023. "Reimagining the Development of Downtown Cahokia Using Remote Sensing Visualizations from the Western Edge of the Grand Plaza," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Héritier Mesa, 2021. "'We might all live the same life, but we are not the same'. Class and social Position in Kinshasa's second-hand clothing trade," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/313551, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Cihan Tuğal, 2021. "Urban Symbolic Violence Re‐Made: Religion, Politics and Spatial Struggles in Istanbul," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 154-163, January.
    8. Michael Mu, Guanglun, 2024. "Groupings between floating children and urban children: A Bourdieusian social network analysis of physical and social distance in space," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Zhou, Zhongsheng & Li, Zhuo & Du, Shanzhong & Cao, June, 2024. "Robot adoption and enterprise R&D manipulation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Sune Qvotrup Jensen & Annick Prieur & Jakob Skjott‐Larsen, 2021. "Living With Stigma: Spatial and Social Divisions in a Danish City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 186-196, January.
    11. Karin Grundström & Christine Lelévrier, 2023. "Imposing ‘Enclosed Communities’? Urban Gating of Large Housing Estates in Sweden and France," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Ridvan Kahraman, 2023. "Centers in the Event Domain: A Retake on the Wholeness of Urban Spaces," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 188-200.
    13. Minjun Zhao & Ning Liu & Jinliu Chen & Danqing Wang & Pengcheng Li & Di Yang & Pu Zhou, 2024. "Navigating Post-COVID-19 Social–Spatial Inequity: Unravelling the Nexus between Community Conditions, Social Perception, and Spatial Differentiation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v12:y:2024:a:7787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.