IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v9y2021i4p412-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Asymmetrical Effect of Polarization on Support for Independence: The Case of Catalonia

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Rodríguez-Teruel

    (Department of Constitutional Law, Political and Administrative Sciences, University of Valencia, Spain)

  • Astrid Barrio

    (Department of Constitutional Law, Political and Administrative Sciences, University of Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The article analyses the consequences of elite polarization at the mass level in the centre-periphery dimension. We analyse the rapid rise in support for independence in Catalonia, focusing on the role of party competition around the centre-periphery cleavage. We argue that mainstream actors’ adoption of centrifugal party strategies with respect to the national question produced a polarizing dynamic in the party system that eventually caused voters’ attitudes regarding the centre-periphery issue to harden. Indeed, we posit that this increase in mass polarization was a consequence of party agency that subsequently helped to drive attitudes regarding independence. To test this hypothesis, we measure centre-periphery polarization (as perceived by voters) by adopting two different perspectives—inter-party distances (horizontal polarization) and party-voter distances (vertical polarization)—and then run logistic regressions to explain support for independence. The findings show an asymmetrical effect on polarization. While the centrifugal strategy implemented by Catalan regionalist parties paved the way for a radicalization of voters on the Catalan nationalist side, among voters for non-regionalist parties, attitudes towards independence were initially less conditioned by this polarization. The results provide evidence of the political effects of elite polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Rodríguez-Teruel & Astrid Barrio, 2021. "The Asymmetrical Effect of Polarization on Support for Independence: The Case of Catalonia," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 412-425.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:412-425
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i4.4627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4627
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:412-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.