IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v8y2020i4p421-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the Interest(s) of Many: Governing Data in Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Clark

    (Department of Organization Sciences, Vrije University Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Kristoffer Albris

    (Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark / Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

The use of digital technologies, social media platforms, and (big) data analytics is reshaping crisis management in the 21st century. In turn, the sharing, collecting, and monitoring of personal and potentially sensitive data during crises has become a central matter of interest and concern which governments, emergency management and humanitarian professionals, and researchers are increasingly addressing. This article asks if these rapidly advancing challenges can be governed in the same ways that data is governed in periods of normalcy. By applying a political realist perspective, we argue that governing data in crises is challenged by state interests and by the complexity of other actors with interests of their own. The article focuses on three key issues: 1) vital interests of the data subject vis-à-vis the right to privacy; 2) the possibilities and limits of an international or global policy on data protection vis-à-vis the interests of states; and 3) the complexity of actors involved in the protection of data. In doing so, we highlight a number of recent cases in which the problems of governing data in crises have become visible.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Clark & Kristoffer Albris, 2020. "In the Interest(s) of Many: Governing Data in Crises," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 421-431.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:4:p:421-431
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:4:p:421-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.