IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v8y2020i4p319-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Rubin

    (Department of Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University, Denmark)

  • Erik Baekkeskov

    (School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia)

Abstract

This article goes beyond the study of speech acts to investigate the process of securitization during a health crisis. The article introduces the concept of ‘expert-led securitization’ to account for situations when experts dominate the administrative process that translates a securitizing speech act into extraordinary public policy. Expert-led securitization was particularly salient during the 2009 pandemic flu in Denmark and Sweden. Autonomous public health expert agencies led the national securitization processes, and these never included intense political battles or extensive public debates. In turn, the respective processes resulted in different policies: Sweden’s main response to the pandemic was an extraordinary push to vaccinate its whole population, while Denmark’s was a one-off offer of vaccination to about twenty percent of its people. Hence, the 2009 pandemic example illustrates the added value of investigating the administrative dynamics of securitization when seeking to understand differences in extraordinary policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Rubin & Erik Baekkeskov, 2020. "Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 319-330.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:319-330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2982
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. anonymous, 2007. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 446-448, 05-06.
    2. Stefan Elbe, 2011. "Pandemics on the Radar Screen: Health Security, Infectious Disease and the Medicalisation of Insecurity," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 59(4), pages 848-866, December.
    3. Thomas Abraham, 2011. "The Chronicle of a Disease Foretold: Pandemic H1N1 and the Construction of a Global Health Security Threat," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 59(4), pages 797-812, December.
    4. Adam Kamradt‐Scott & Kelley Lee, 2011. "The 2011 Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework: Global Health Secured or a Missed Opportunity?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 59(4), pages 831-847, December.
    5. Erik Baekkeskov, 2016. "Explaining science-led policy-making: pandemic deaths, epistemic deliberation and ideational trajectories," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 395-419, December.
    6. Anne Roemer-Mahler & Stefan Elbe, 2016. "The race for Ebola drugs: pharmaceuticals, security and global health governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 487-506, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorothea Hilhorst & Kees Boersma & Emmanuel Raju, 2020. "Research on Politics of Disaster Risk Governance: Where Are We Headed?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 214-219.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamish van der Ven & Yixian Sun, 2021. "Varieties of Crises: Comparing the Politics of COVID-19 and Climate Change," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 13-22, Winter.
    2. Aleksandra Tokarz & Diana Malinowska, 2019. "From Psychological Theoretical Assumptions to New Research Perspectives in Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Motivation in the Workplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Kuriakose Mamkoottam & Nidhi Kaicker, 2015. "Living Wage Benchmark Report: Rural India, Uttar Pradesh (December 2015)," Global Living Wage Coalition (GLWC) 15-01-08, Universidad Privada Boliviana.
    4. Sanaz Honarmand Ebrahimi & Marinus Ossewaarde, 2019. "Not a Security Issue: How Policy Experts De-Politicize the Climate Change–Migration Nexus," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Alexandra Ainz-Galende & Rubén Rodríguez-Puertas, 2020. "The Demands of Niqabi Women in the Telegram Subaltern Corner Orgullo Niqabi," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 286-295.
    6. David Neilson, 2022. "Learning for the Future beyond COVID-19: A Critical Alternative to the Neoliberal Model of Development," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Rubén Rodríguez-Puertas & Alexandra Ainz, 2019. "Nostalgic, Converted, or Cosmopolitan: Typology of Young Spanish Migrants," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 332-342.
    8. Silva, Maria Laura & Perrier, Lionel & Cohen, Jean Marie & Paget, William John & Mosnier, Anne & Späth, Hans Martin, 2015. "A literature review to identify factors that determine policies for influenza vaccination," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 697-708.
    9. Jennifer E. Mosley & Katherine Gibson, 2017. "Strategic use of evidence in state-level policymaking: matching evidence type to legislative stage," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 697-719, December.
    10. Michael McGann & Emma Blomkamp & Jenny M. Lewis, 2018. "The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 249-267, September.
    11. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour’s Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE Papers case177, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    12. Syed Akhtar Hussain Shah, 2020. "Pursuit of Ideal Strategy to Manage Pandemic: A Comparative Study of COVID 19 for USA, Italy, Spain, China, and Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2020:17, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    13. Lavinas, Lena. & Moellmann Ferro, Thiago Andrade., 2014. "A long way from tax justice : the Brazilian case," ILO Working Papers 994851303402676, International Labour Organization.
    14. Riyana Miranti & Peng Yu, 2015. "Why Social Exclusion Persists among Older People in Australia," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 112-126.
    15. Andrea Pettrachin & Leila Hadj Abdou, 2024. "Beyond evidence-based policymaking? Exploring knowledge formation and source effects in US migration policymaking," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 3-28, March.
    16. Lea-Rachel Kosnik & Allen Bellas, 2020. "Drivers of COVID-19 Stay at Home Orders: Epidemiologic, Economic, or Political Concerns?," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 503-514, October.
    17. repec:ilo:ilowps:485130 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2021. "Pandemic Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 20401.
    19. Hanrieder, Tine & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, 2014. "WHO decides on the exception? Securitization and emergency governance in global health," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 331-348.
    20. Moshe Maor, 2020. "Policy over- and under-design: an information quality perspective," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 395-411, September.
    21. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58086, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:319-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.