IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v7y2019i2p380-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

American State Ballot Initiatives and Income Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua J. Dyck

    (Political Science Department, University of Massachusetts - Lowell, USA)

  • Wesley Hussey

    (Political Science Department, California State University, USA)

  • Edward L. Lascher, Jr.

    (Department of Public Policy & Administration, California State University, USA)

Abstract

Some have argued that the ballot initiative process prevalent in many American states might lower inequality. We contend this is improbable based on what is known about whether expansion of democracy leads to redistribution, the attitudes of citizens, and the characteristics of the initiative process. Nevertheless, the proposition needs testing. We examine three types of evidence. First, we analyze the content and passage of all post-World War II initiatives going to voters in California, a state that makes heavy use of ballot propositions. Second, we model institutional factors influencing differences in inequality at the state-level from 1976–2014 to test the aggregate-level effect of ballot initiatives on income inequality. Third, we use individual level data to evaluate the claim that frequent initiative use makes lower income people happier because it helps to reduce inequality. Our analyses consistently indicate that the ballot initiative process fails to reduce income inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua J. Dyck & Wesley Hussey & Edward L. Lascher, Jr., 2019. "American State Ballot Initiatives and Income Inequality," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 380-409.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:2:p:380-409
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v7i2.1873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v7i2.1873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:2:p:380-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.