IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i3p196-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insidiously Trivial: Meme Format Reduces Perceived Influence and Intent to Debate Partisan Claims

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin A. Lyons

    (Department of Communication, University of Utah, USA / Department of Politics, University of Exeter, UK)

Abstract

If citizens systematically respond differently to claims conveyed by memes, their effects on the broader information ecosystem may be underestimated. This US-based study (N = 598) uses a 2 (partisan news/meme format) x 2 (congenial/uncongenial message) design to examine perceptions of partisan memes’ influence on self and others, and the format’s effect on willingness to share disagreement in the context of partisan claims about corruption surrounding biofuels operations. Results indicate that meme format enhances individuals’ tendency to see messages as less influential on oneself than on others and individuals less intent to share disagreement with claims presented in meme format. This decrease is mediated by the decrease in perceived influence over self. These findings call attention to the role format differences may play in the psychological processes underlying political discussion as it becomes increasingly mediated and visual.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin A. Lyons, 2022. "Insidiously Trivial: Meme Format Reduces Perceived Influence and Intent to Debate Partisan Claims," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 196-205.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:3:p:196-205
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v10i3.5388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5388
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:3:p:196-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.