IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2014i4p229-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarities And Dissimilarities Between The Romanian Public Accounting System And Ipsas 1 – Presentation Of Financial Statements

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei-Răzvan CRIȘAN

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babeș-Bolyai University)

Abstract

Nowadays, the accounting harmonization in the public sector has become a key problem in the accounting world. The need for harmonization is generated by the globalization process, both in the private and public sector. This is the reason why the awareness of international bodies for public sector accounting harmonization is significantly raising. The aim of the paper is to compare the information disclosed by the Romanian legal framework to information disclosed by IPSAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements, in order to determine the extent to which Romanian laws took the provisions of this standard that is considered by researchers a significant point of modern accounting. The authors try to establish the extent to which the central Romanian regulations have taken the main provisions from IPSAS 1. The purpose is to discover the similarity degree between these two regulations. This study is useful for the authorities empowered to publish regulations because it helps to determine the most important omissions from IPSAS 1 and find the best solutions for improving the future legislation, in order to be as close as possible to IPSAS.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei-Răzvan CRIȘAN, 2014. "Similarities And Dissimilarities Between The Romanian Public Accounting System And Ipsas 1 – Presentation Of Financial Statements," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 229-235, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2014:i:4:p:229-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_4_23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Christiaens & B. Reyniers, 2009. "Impact of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Information Systems: A Comparative Study," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/600, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Isabel Brusca & Vicente Montesinos & Danny S. L. Chow, 2013. "Legitimating International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS): the case of Spain," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 437-444, November.
    3. Nadia Albu & Cătălin Nicolae Albu, 2012. "International Financial Reporting Standards in an Emerging Economy: Lessons from Romania," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 22(4), pages 341-352, December.
    4. J. Christiaens & C. Vanhee & F. Manes-Rossi & N. Aversano, 2013. "The Effect of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Reporting: an International Comparison," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/845, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolae Marinescu, 2016. "Spillover Effects From Foreign Direct Investment To Local Smes. An Empirical Study," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    2. Oana Adriana Gica & Cristina Ioana Balint, 2016. "Tourism Globalization. The Case Of Romania," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    3. Andrei-Razvan Crisan & Cristina Silvia Nistor & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Tudor Oprisor, 2016. "Ipsas Implementation And Perspectives For Epsas Implementation At The European Union Local Government Levels," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    4. Oulasvirta Lasse Olavi, 2014. "Governmental Financial Accounting and European Harmonisation: Case Study of Finland," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 237-263, December.
    5. Wioletta Mierzejewska, 2016. "STRATEGIES AND STRUCTURES OF POLISH SMEs," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    6. Andrei R. CRIŞAN, 2014. "Governmental Financial Reports: Between Variety And Integration," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 55-65, May.
    7. David PROCHÃ ZKA, 2017. "Specifics Of Ifrs Adoption By Central And Eastern European Countries: Evidence From Research," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 64(1), pages 59-81, March.
    8. Tudor Liviu-Alexandru, 2018. "The Impact Of Ifrs Adoption In Emerging Economies," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 152-157, December.
    9. Andreea Paula Dumitru, 2014. "Perceptions Of Professional Accountants On The Costs And Benefits Of Implementing Ias/Ifrs In Romania," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 2(2), pages 66-75, November.
    10. Sílvio Hiroshi Nakao & Sidney J. Gray, 2018. "The Impact of IFRS in Brazil: The Legacy of Mandatory Book‐tax Conformity," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 482-495, December.
    11. Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de & Batley, Richard A., 2022. "Pathways to hybridization: Assimilation and accommodation of public financial reforms in Brazil," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. NICHITA Mirela & GAJEVSZKY Andra, 2015. "Evolution And Quality Of Financial Reporting In Romania: An Overview From 1990 To Present," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 949-958, July.
    13. Khaldoon Al†Htaybat, 2018. "IFRS Adoption in Emerging Markets: The Case of Jordan," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 28-47, March.
    14. Carolyn J. Cordery & Kevin Simpkins, 2016. "Financial reporting standards for the public sector: New Zealand's 21st-century experience," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 209-218, April.
    15. Dragos Andrei Stoica, 2021. "General Opinions about the Adoption of IAS/IFRS in Romania," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 24(82), pages 132-139, December,.
    16. Roberto Aprile & Laura Bini, 2018. "The role of institutions in the process of global convergence to IFRS," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 111-134.
    17. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    18. David Alexander & Anna Alon, 2017. "Layering of IFRS and Dual Institutionality of Accounting Standards in Belarus," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 261-278, September.
    19. Vincenzo Sforza & Riccardo Cimini, 2017. "Running the Obstacle Race towards Public Accounting Harmonization in EU-28: A Temporal Study," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 1-49, February.
    20. Tudor Liviu-Alexandru, 2022. "IFRS adoption and the impact on foreign direct investment – evidence from Central and Eastern European countries," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 870-878, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Similarity; Dissimilarity; IPSAS Romania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2014:i:4:p:229-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.