IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/aelcon/v4y2014i3p27n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governmental Financial Accounting and European Harmonisation: Case Study of Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Oulasvirta Lasse Olavi

    (School of Management, University of Tampere, Kanslerinrinne 1, FI-33014 University of Tampere, Finland)

Abstract

The Finnish government accounting has developed from its own premises which used to emphasise the importance of budgetary accounting and prudence. Since the 1990s and the impact of New Public Financial Management, the Finnish government financial accounting has been accruals based. However, the Finnish application of accruals is based on the income statement approach, realisation principle and prudence. The International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) based more on the balance sheet approach and fair value accounting are not suitable for the Finnish government accounting culture and practice. Furthermore, this means from the Finnish perspective that the EPSAS standards should not be based on IPSAS but on a conceptual framework especially developed for the European context.

Suggested Citation

  • Oulasvirta Lasse Olavi, 2014. "Governmental Financial Accounting and European Harmonisation: Case Study of Finland," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 237-263, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:27:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/ael-2014-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2014-0006
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ael-2014-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allan Barton, 2005. "Professional Accounting Standards and the Public Sector—a Mismatch," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 41(2), pages 138-158, June.
    2. Nobes, Christopher, 2004. "On accounting classification and the international harmonisation debate," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 189-200, February.
    3. Pekka Pirinen, 2005. "Economic and normative pressures as drivers for the adoption of International Accounting Standards in Finland since 1976," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 213-235.
    4. Michela Arnaboldi & Irvine Lapsley, 2009. "On the Implementation of Accrual Accounting: A Study of Conflict and Ambiguity," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 809-836.
    5. J. Christiaens & B. Reyniers, 2009. "Impact of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Information Systems: A Comparative Study," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/600, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. Timothy C Irwin, 2012. "Accounting Devices and Fiscal Illusions," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 12/02, International Monetary Fund.
    7. Mr. Timothy C Irwin, 2012. "Accounting Devices and Fiscal Illusions," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 2012/002, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Vicente Pina & Lourdes Torres & Ana Yetano, 2009. "Accrual Accounting in EU Local Governments: One Method, Several Approaches," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 765-807.
    9. J. Christiaens & C. Vanhee & F. Manes-Rossi & N. Aversano, 2013. "The Effect of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Reporting: an International Comparison," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/845, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    10. Biondi Yuri, 2012. "What Do Shareholders Do? Accounting, Ownership and the Theory of the Firm: Implications for Corporate Governance and Reporting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-29, June.
    11. Oulasvirta, Lasse, 2014. "The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards of the IFAC. A critical case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 272-285.
    12. Collin, Sven-Olof Yrjö & Tagesson, Torbjörn & Andersson, Anette & Cato, Joosefin & Hansson, Karin, 2009. "Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 141-174.
    13. Allan Barton, 2011. "Why Governments Should Use the Government Finance Statistics Accounting System," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 47(4), pages 411-445, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zubir Azhar & Ervina Alfan & Krishnen Kishan & Nurul Husna Assanah, 2022. "Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 36-62, March.
    2. Oulasvirta, Lasse, 2014. "The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards of the IFAC. A critical case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 272-285.
    3. Mari Kobayashi & Kiyoshi Yamamoto & Keiko Ishikawa, 2016. "The Usefulness of Accrual Information in Non‐mandatory Environments: The Case of Japanese Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 153-161, June.
    4. Christofzik, Désirée I., 2019. "Does accrual accounting alter fiscal policy decisions? - Evidence from Germany," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Christian Nitzl & Dennis Hilgers & Bernhard Hirsch & David Lindermüller, 2020. "The Influence of the Organizational Structure, Environment, and Resource Provision on the Use of Accrual Accounting in Municipalities," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(2), pages 271-298, April.
    6. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    7. Bradley, Michael & De Lira Salvatierra, Irving & Gulati, Mitu, 2014. "Lawyers: Gatekeepers of the sovereign debt market?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(S), pages 150-168.
    8. Ferry, Laurence & Zakaria, Zamzulaila & Zakaria, Zarina & Slack, Richard, 2018. "Framing public governance in Malaysia: Rhetorical appeals through accrual accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 170-183.
    9. Ozkaya, Ata, 2014. "Creative accounting practices and measurement methods: Evidence from Turkey," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-27.
    10. Deborah Mabbett & Waltraud Schelkle, 2014. "Searching under the lamp-post: the evolution of fiscal surveillance," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 5, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    11. Olivier J Blanchard & Giovanni Dell'Ariccia & Paolo Mauro, 2013. "Rethinking Macro Policy II; Getting Granular," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 13/003, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Mr. Timothy C Irwin, 2012. "Some Algebra of Fiscal Transparency: How Accounting Devices Work and How to Reveal Them," IMF Working Papers 2012/228, International Monetary Fund.
    13. Andrei-Razvan CRISAN, 2016. "An Assessment Of The Transparency Level In Romanian Public Universities," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 83-91, December.
    14. J. Christiaens & C. Vanhee & F. Manes-Rossi & N. Aversano, 2013. "The Effect of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Reporting: an International Comparison," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/845, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    15. Mark Hellowell & Veronica Vecchi & Stefano Caselli, 2015. "Return of the state? An appraisal of policies to enhance access to credit for infrastructure-based PPPs," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 71-78, January.
    16. Kohler, Pierre, 2014. "Asset-Centred Redistributive Policies for Sustainable Development," MPRA Paper 55357, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Kady Keita & Mr. Gene L. Leon & Frederico Lima, 2019. "Do Financial Markets Value Quality of Fiscal Governance?," IMF Working Papers 2019/218, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Anita Golovkova, 2020. "IFRS implementation in healthcare facilities in the United Kingdom: (un)intended effects [Implementace IFRS ve zdravotnických zařízeních ve Velké Británii – (ne)zamyšlené dopady]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(3-4).
    19. Olivier Blanchard & Giovanni Dell'Ariccia & Paolo Mauro, 2014. "Introduction: Rethinking Macro Policy II--Getting Granular," MIT Press Book Chapters, in: What Have We Learned? Macroeconomic Policy After the Crisis, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1-28, The MIT Press.
    20. Andrei-Răzvan CRIȘAN, 2014. "Similarities And Dissimilarities Between The Romanian Public Accounting System And Ipsas 1 – Presentation Of Financial Statements," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 229-235, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:27:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.