IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cey/panora/v1y2015i2p25-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desarrollo de un instrumento para la medición de la gestión del conocimiento

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel à ngel Velázquez Alejos
  • Denise Gómez Hernández

    (Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro)

  • Alicia Alma Alejos Gallardo

    (Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya)

Abstract

Hoy por hoy, las empresas que buscan día con día una estabilidad económica importante, han determinado la relevancia del diseño tecnológico y la innovación que les permitan generar ventajas competitivas a nivel nacional e internacional, ambos elementos requieren en primera instancia de una gestión eficiente y eficaz del conocimiento que contribuya a sus logros. El objetivo del presente estudio es diseñar un instrumento para la primera fase de una investigación más amplia, el cual obtendrá información sobre la situación de las PyMEs que integran el clúster automotriz de Guanajuato, en relación a la gestión del conocimiento. El procedimiento para desarrollar el instrumento, fue a través del estudio de los principales referentes teóricos sobre el tema, lo que permitió elaborar un cuestionario que a través del método de expertos fue analizado, además de efectuar su adecuación por medio del trabajo colaborativo. Today, companies that look out an everyday economic stability, have determined the relevance of technological design and innovation that enable them to generate national and international competitive advantage, both elements require in first instance an efficient and effective knowledge management that will contribute to their achievement. The aim of this study is to design an instrument that in a further research will be applied to obtain relevant information on the situation of the SMEs that integrate the automotive cluster of Guanajuato, in relation to knowledge management. The process to develop the instrument, was through an analysis of the main theoretical references on the subject. An initial instrument was examined by the experts method, making its adaptation through a collaborative work.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel à ngel Velázquez Alejos & Denise Gómez Hernández & Alicia Alma Alejos Gallardo, 2015. "Desarrollo de un instrumento para la medición de la gestión del conocimiento," Ravista Raites antes Panorama Administrativo Journal, Red de Investigación en Administración de la Innovación Tecnológica, Económica y Sustentable - Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Departamento de Ciencias Económico Administrativas, vol. 1(2), pages 25-43, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cey:panora:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:25-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.raites.org.mx/articulos/22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://raites.org.mx/revista/index.php/Raites/article/view/17/22
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    2. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    3. João Juchem Neto & Julio Claeyssen, 2015. "Capital-induced labor migration in a spatial Solow model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 25-47, May.
    4. Arcalean, Calin & Glomm, Gerhard & Schiopu, Ioana, 2012. "Growth effects of spatial redistribution policies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 988-1008.
    5. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    6. Joan R Rosés & Nikolaus Wolf, 2021. "Regional growth and inequality in the long-run: Europe, 1900–2015," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 17-48.
    7. Emma Howard, 2017. "Social networks, geographic proximity, and firm performance in Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    9. Gao, Ting, 2004. "Regional industrial growth: evidence from Chinese industries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-124, January.
    10. María Ayuda & Fernando Collantes & Vicente Pinilla, 2010. "From locational fundamentals to increasing returns: the spatial concentration of population in Spain, 1787–2000," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 25-50, March.
    11. Vasco Leite & Sofia Castro & João Correia-da-Silva, 2009. "The core periphery model with asymmetric inter-regional and intra-regional trade costs," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 8(1), pages 37-44, April.
    12. Sidney Turner & Richard Turner, 2011. "Capital cities: a special case in urban development," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(1), pages 19-35, February.
    13. Agarwalla, Astha, 2011. "Agglomeration Economies and Productivity Growth in India," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-01-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    14. Masashige Hamano & Pierre M. Picard, 2017. "Extensive and intensive margins and exchange rate regimes," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 804-837, August.
    15. Michael Beenstock & Daniel Felsenstein, 2003. "Decomposing the Dynamics of Regional Earnings Disparities in Israel," ERSA conference papers ersa03p90, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Michele Fratianni & Francesco Marchionne, 2011. "The Limits to Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Catherine Baumont, 1995. "Urban economics and endogenous dynamics in regional growth [Economies d'agglomération et dynamique endogène de croissance des régions]," Working Papers hal-01527237, HAL.
    18. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Tselios, Vassilis & Winkler, Deborah & Farole, Thomas, 2013. "Geography and the Determinants of Firm Exports in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 225-240.
    19. Arun Natarajan Hariharan & Arindam Biswas, 2020. "A Critical review of the Indian knowledge‐based industry location policy against its theoretical arguments," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 431-454, June.
    20. Mohamed Amara & Khaled Thabet, 2019. "Firm and regional factors of productivity: a multilevel analysis of Tunisian manufacturing," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 25-51, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Conocimiento; tecnología; innovación; clúster industrial; ventaja competitiva. Knowledge; technology; innovation; industrial cluster; competitive advantage.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cey:panora:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:25-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Julian Ferrer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deitcmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.