IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v63y2010i09p25-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionen und Wachstum – ein Ranking für OECD-Länder

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Ochel
  • Anja Rohwer
  • Anja Hülsewig

Abstract

Für einzelne Länder ist es von Interesse zu erfahren, ob ihre institutionellen Regelungen Eigenschaften aufweisen, mit denen erfahrungsgemäß ein hohes Wachstum des Pro-Kopf-Einkommens erreicht werden kann. Eine solche Einschätzung kann mit dem Institutionenindex vorgenommen werden, der vom ifo Institut in Zusammenarbeit mit Theo Eicher, University of Washington, Seattle, entwickelt worden ist. Der Index liefert einen Maßstab, um die Qualität der Institutionen eines Landes zu bewerten. Für das Jahr 2009 wiesen die Veränderungen des Index einen gleichläufigen Verlauf mit den Veränderungen des Pro-Kopf-Einkommens in den OECD-Ländern auf. Das heißt, zeitlich verzögerte und gemittelte institutionelle Indikatoren eignen sich gut für die Vorhersage des Wirtschaftswachstums in den OECD-Ländern. Für den Anstieg des Institutionenindex und damit auch für das Wachstum der OECD-Länder insgesamt waren vor allem die Erhöhung der Effizienz des Humankapitals, Reformen der Arbeitsmärkte und strukturelle Anpassungen bei den Staatsausgaben verantwortlich.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Ochel & Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2010. "Institutionen und Wachstum – ein Ranking für OECD-Länder," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(09), pages 25-31, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:63:y:2010:i:09:p:25-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2010_9_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ces:ifodic:v:5:y:2007:i:1:p:14567286 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wolfgang Ochel & Oliver Röhn, 2008. "Indikatorenbasierte Länderrankings," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(2), pages 226-251, May.
    3. Wolfgang Ochel & Rigmar Osterkamp, 2007. "What Does the Institutions Climate Index for OECD Countries Tell us about Institutional Change and Economic Policy Reforms?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 5(1), pages 50-62, 05.
    4. Theo Eicher & Wolfgang Ochel & Oliver Roehn & Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2008. "Institutionen und Wirtschaftswachstum in den OECD-Ländern," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 61(11), pages 28-36, June.
    5. Theo Eicher & Oliver Röhn, 2007. "Institutional Determinants of Economic Performance in OECD Countries – An Institutions Climate Index," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 5(1), pages 38-49, 05.
    6. Wolfgang Ochel & Rigmar Osterkamp, 2007. "What Does the Institutions Climate Index for OECD Countries Tell us about Institutional Change and Economic Policy Reforms?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 5(01), pages 50-62, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theo Eicher & Wolfgang Ochel & Oliver Roehn & Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2008. "Institutionen und Wirtschaftswachstum in den OECD-Ländern," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 61(11), pages 28-36, June.
    2. Nick Hoffmann & Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2010. "DICE – eine Datenbank von institutionellen Regelungen im internationalen Vergleich," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(04), pages 31-39, February.
    3. Anja Rohwer, 2011. "Institutions Matter – Results of the Institutions Climate Index for OECD Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 9(3), pages 68-74, October.
    4. Theo Eicher & Wolfgang Ochel & Oliver Röhn & Anja Hülsewig, 2009. "Institutions and Growth in OECD Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(2), pages 24-29, 07.
    5. repec:ces:ifodic:v:9:y:2011:i:3:p:16752113 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:ces:ifodic:v:7:y:2009:i:2:p:14567093 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:ces:ifodic:v:9:y:2011:i:3:p:68-73 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2011. "Institutions Matter – Results of the Institutions Climate Index for OECD Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 9(03), pages 68-73, October.
    9. Theo Eicher & Wolfgang Ochel & Oliver Roehn & Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2009. "Institutions and Growth in OECD Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(02), pages 24-29, July.
    10. Walter Buhr, 2009. "Infrastructure of the Market Economy," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 132-09, Universität Siegen, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht.
    11. Kuncic, Aljaz, 2012. "Institutional quality database," Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers 457, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Wolfgang Ochel & Rigmar Osterkamp, 2007. "What Does the Institutions Climate Index for OECD Countries Tell us about Institutional Change and Economic Policy Reforms?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 5(1), pages 50-62, 05.
    13. Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2012. "Update des ifo Institutionenindex für OECD-Länder, 2012 – Kurzfassung der neuen Ergebnisse," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(13), pages 69-75, July.
    14. Jue Yang & Shunsuke Managi & Masayuki Sato, 2015. "The effect of institutional quality on national wealth: an examination using multiple imputation method," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 17(3), pages 431-453, July.
    15. Jürgen Wandel, 2011. "Business groups and competition in post-Soviet transition economies: The case of Russian “agroholdings”," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(4), pages 403-450, December.
    16. Thomas Strobel, 2010. "Institutions and Innovations as Sources of Productivity Growth Cross-Country Evidence," ifo Working Paper Series 87, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    17. Beckmann Klaus & Gerrits Carsten, 2009. "Armutsbekämpfung durch Reduktion von Korruption: eine Rolle für Unternehmen? / Fighting poverty by fighting corruption: A task for private enterprise?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 60(1), pages 463-494, January.
    18. Óscar Afonso & Inês Almeida & Natércia Fortuna, 2021. "Impact of Institutions on Economic Growth Across OECD Countries," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(6), pages 654-674.
    19. Samuel Chingoiro & Strike Mbulawa, 2017. "Electricity consumption and Economic growth in Botswana: A Vector Error Correction approach," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6.
    20. Wilhelm Kohler & Christian Arndt & Anselm Mattes & Michael Knogler & Fidelis Lankes & Jarko Fidmuc, 2007. "Die neuen Mitglieder: Motor oder Bremse der europäischen Integration?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 60(14), pages 03-20, July.
    21. Beckmann, Klaus B., 2011. "Das liberale Trilemma," Working Paper 107/2010, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ranking-Verfahren; Vergleich; Institutionalismus; Wirtschaftswachstum; OECD-Staaten;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:63:y:2010:i:09:p:25-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.