IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifodre/v31y2024i06p07-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ein Wechsel zur Widerspruchslösung bei Organspenden – Erfahrungen aus Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Selina Schulze Spüntrup

Abstract

Vor dem Hintergrund zu geringer Organspenderzahlen wird immer wieder die sogenannte Widerspruchslösung diskutiert – so auch in Deutschland. Während bei der Widerspruchslösung grundsätzlich jede*r als potenzielle*r Organspender*in gilt, sofern zu Lebzeiten nicht widersprochen wurde, ist bei der Zustimmungslösung eine explizite Einwilligung für eine Organentnahme erforderlich. In der (jüngsten) Vergangenheit haben sich bereits einige Länder für einen Wechsel hin zur Widerspruchslösung entschieden. Dieser Beitrag zeigt, wie sich solch eine Umstellung in Wales auf die dortigen Organspenderraten auswirkt. Nach der Einführung der Widerspruchslösung gab es in Wales deutlich mehr Organspender*innen, als wenn die Reform nicht stattgefunden hätte.

Suggested Citation

  • Selina Schulze Spüntrup, 2024. "Ein Wechsel zur Widerspruchslösung bei Organspenden – Erfahrungen aus Wales," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 31(06), pages 07-09, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:31:y:2024:i:06:p:07-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifoDD_24-06_07-09_Schulze_Spuentrup.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abadie, Alberto & Gay, Sebastien, 2006. "The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 599-620, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    2. Takanori Ida & Naoya Motegi & Yoshiaki Ushifusa, 2016. "Behavioral Study of Personalized Automated Demand Response in Workplaces," Discussion papers e-16-010, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    3. Kirchgässner, Gebhard, 2012. "Sanfter Paternalismus, meritorische Güter, und der normative Individualismus," Economics Working Paper Series 1217, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    4. Lars Behlen & Oliver Himmler & Robert Jäckle, 2023. "Defaults and effortful tasks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1022-1059, November.
    5. Boas, Hagai, 2011. "Where do human organs come from? Trends of generalized and restricted altruism in organ donations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1378-1385.
    6. Janice Y. Jung & Barbara A. Mellers, 2016. "American attitudes toward nudges," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 62-74, January.
    7. Löfgren, Åsa & Nordblom, Katarina, 2020. "A theoretical framework of decision making explaining the mechanisms of nudging," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Cvelbar, Ljubica Knezevic & Grün, Bettina & Dolnicar, Sara, 2019. "“To clean or not to clean?” Reducing daily routine hotel room cleaning by letting tourists answer this question for themselves," SocArXiv vb9qa_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Anna Aizer, 2017. "A Review Essay on Isabel Sawhill's Generation Unbound: Drifting into Sex and Parenting without Marriage and Laurence Steinberg's Age of Opportunity: Lessons from the New Science of Adolescence," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(2), pages 592-608, June.
    10. Georg Liebig & Jens Rommel, 2014. "Active and Forced Choice for Overcoming Status Quo Bias: A Field Experiment on the Adoption of “No junk mail” Stickers in Berlin, Germany," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 423-435, September.
    11. Gabriel D. Carroll & James J. Choi & David Laibson & Brigitte C. Madrian & Andrew Metrick, 2009. "Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(4), pages 1639-1674.
    12. Steffen Altmann & Armin Falk & Paul Heidhues & Rajshri Jayaraman & Marrit Teirlinck, 2019. "Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(5), pages 808-826, December.
    13. Beshears, John & Choi, James J. & Laibson, David & Madrian, Brigitte C., 2008. "How are preferences revealed?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(8-9), pages 1787-1794, August.
    14. Meredith Fowlie & Catherine Wolfram & C. Anna Spurlock & Annika Todd & Patrick Baylis & Peter Cappers, 2017. "Default Effects and Follow-On Behavior: Evidence from an Electricity Pricing Program," NBER Working Papers 23553, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Damon Jones, 2012. "Inertia and Overwithholding: Explaining the Prevalence of Income Tax Refunds," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 4(1), pages 158-185, February.
    16. Ericson, Keith M. Marzilli, 2020. "When consumers do not make an active decision: Dynamic default rules and their equilibrium effects," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 369-385.
    17. Lex Borghans & Bart Golsteyn, 2014. "Default options and training participation," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1417-1428, June.
    18. Michael G. Pollitt & Irina Shaorshadze, 2013. "The role of behavioural economics in energy and climate policy," Chapters, in: Roger Fouquet (ed.), Handbook on Energy and Climate Change, chapter 24, pages 523-546, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Joan Costa-Font & Caroline Rudisill & Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, 2021. "‘Relative Consent’ or ‘Presumed Consent’? Organ donation attitudes and behaviour," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(1), pages 5-16, February.
    20. Selina Schulze Spüntrup, 2023. "Does Implementing Opt-Out Solve The Organ Shortage Problem? Evidence from a Synthetic Control Approach," ifo Working Paper Series 403, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:31:y:2024:i:06:p:07-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.