IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Policy in Canada: A Holistic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Schwanen

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

Abstract

Canada is widely considered to be an innovation under-achiever, despite decades-long attempts to address this gap. In light of this criticism, this Commentary reviews the range of policy tools that governments in advanced economies have at their disposal to foster innovation. It takes a holistic approach to innovation policy in that many of the policy areas covered in this report are not primarily designed to spur innovation per se, but nevertheless can have a significant impact on it. Innovation policy is less likely to succeed if it does not carefully integrate measures affecting the four essential ingredients of talent and knowledge, entrepreneurship and business growth, innovation in government, and clarity of purpose for government support. This entails, but is not limited to, adopting government framework policies to encourage innovation, such as a pro-innovation tax system, trade policy, intellectual-property regime, competition policy, and approach to regulation, as well as fostering acceptance of innovation in civil society and the general public. Key areas for potential improvement, ultimately contributing to raising Canadians’ standards of living, include: • a greater focus on research and educational excellence, and on deploying and attracting related talent and skills, including those beyond scientific and engineering skills, such as marketing and business; • a suite of trade, fiscal, regulatory and other policies and approaches to: 1) foster entrepreneurship and economic activity based on existing talent, skills and this research; 2) facilitate the risk-taking – and acceptance of risk-taking – that such activities entail; and 3) remove unnecessary barriers to these activities; • innovation in the delivery of public services themselves; and • a more goals-oriented approach to government support for business innovation that nevertheless relies more on market and other arm’s length mechanisms, as well as international collaboration in some areas, to achieve desired goals. The ultimate motivation for wanting to improve Canada’s innovation performance is simple: to improve Canadians’ overall standards of living.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Schwanen, 2017. "Innovation Policy in Canada: A Holistic Approach," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 497, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/C.D.%20Howe%20Commentary%20-%20Innovation%20Policy%20in%20Canada%2C%20A%20Holistic%20Approach_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Gordon, 2016. "The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10544.
    2. Daniel Schwanen & Aaron Jacobs, 2017. "Patents, Copyright and Competition: Assessing the Impact of Trade Deals on Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 474, March.
    3. Alex Laurin & Kevin Milligan, 2017. "Tax Options for Childcare that Encourage Work, Flexibility, Choice, Fairness and Quality," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 481, May.
    4. Gavin Wright & Jesse Czelusta, 2004. "WHY ECONOMIES SLOW: The Myth of the Resource Curse," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 6-38.
    5. Adam Found, 2017. "Flying Below the Radar: The Harmful Impact of Ontario’s Business Property Tax," e-briefs 266, C.D. Howe Institute.
    6. Jacob Greenspon & Erika Rodigues, 2017. "Are Trends in Patenting Reflective of Innovative Activity in Canada?," CSLS Research Reports 2017-02, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    7. Taylor, Mark Zachary, 2016. "The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science and Technology," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190464134.
    8. Alexander Murray, 2016. "Developing an Inclusive Innovation Agenda for Canada," CSLS Research Reports 2016-18, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    9. Paul Segerstrom & Elias Dinopoulos, 1999. "A Schumpeterian Model of Protection and Relative Wages," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(3), pages 450-472, June.
    10. Nancy T. Gallini, 2002. "The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 131-154, Spring.
    11. Martin Feldstein, 2017. "Underestimating the Real Growth of GDP, Personal Income, and Productivity," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 145-164, Spring.
    12. Robert J. Gordon, 2016. "Perspectives on The Rise and Fall of American Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 72-76, May.
    13. Lin,Justin Yifu, 2009. "Economic Development and Transition," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521735513, November.
    14. Alexander S. Kritikos, 2024. "Entrepreneurs and their impact on jobs and economic growth," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 1-8.2, October.
    15. Crespo, Aranzazu, 2012. "Trade, Innovation and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis of Europe," MPRA Paper 57162, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Lin,Justin Yifu, 2009. "Economic Development and Transition," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521514521, November.
    17. Peter Nicholson, 2016. "Canada's Low-Innovation Equilibrium: Why It Has Been Sustained and How It Will Be Disrupted," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 42(s1), pages 39-45, November.
    18. Peter Howitt, 2013. "From Curiosity to Wealth Creation: How University Research can Boost Economic Growth," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 383, June.
    19. A. E. Safarian, 2015. "Simplifying the Rule Book: a Proposal to Reform and Clarify Canada’s Policy on Inward Foreign Direct Investment," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 425, May.
    20. Mark Parsons, 2011. "Rewarding Innovation: Improving Federal Tax Support for Business R&D in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 334, September.
    21. Bruno Crepon & Emmanuel Duguet & Jacques Mairesse, 1998. "Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 115-158.
    22. Alla Lileeva & Daniel Trefler, 2010. "Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-level Productivity…For Some Plants," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(3), pages 1051-1099.
    23. Kevin Milligan, 2014. "Tax Policy for a New Era: Promoting Economic Growth and Fairness," Benefactors Lecture 2014, C.D. Howe Institute.
    24. repec:iza:izawol:journl:y:2014:p:8 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Lawrence L. Herman, 2012. "The New Multilateralism: The Shift to Private Global Regulation," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 360, August.
    26. Ben Dachis, 2013. "Cars, Congestion and Costs: A New Approach to Evaluating Government Infrastructure Investment," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 385, July.
    27. Daniel V. Gordon & Jean-Francois Wen, 2017. "A Question of Fairness: Time to Reconsider Income-Averaging Provisions," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 494, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morgan, Horatio M., 2024. "An Integrative Institutional Framework on the Canada-U.S. Business Performance Gap," MPRA Paper 119739, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Farah Omran & Jeremy Kronick, 2019. "Productivity and the Financial Services Sector – How to Achieve New Heights," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 555, October.
    3. Ghanim Alhajeri, 2021. "Achieving Youth Empowerment in UAE through Incorporating Entrepreneurial Skills in Technical Vocational Education and Training," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(4), pages 101-101, April.
    4. Jeremy Kronick, 2018. "Productivity and the Financial Sector – What’s Missing?," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 508, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esfandiar Maasoumi & Almas Heshmati & Inhee Lee, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Green innovations and patenting renewable energy technologies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 513-538, January.
    2. Justin Yifu Lin & David Rosenblatt, 2012. "Shifting patterns of economic growth and rethinking development," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 171-194, September.
    3. Etienne Farvaque & Alexander Mihailov & Alireza Naghavi, 2018. "The Grand Experiment of Communism: Discovering the Trade-Off between Equality and Efficiency," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(4), pages 707-742, December.
    4. Wang, Can & Deng, Mengzhi & Deng, Junfeng, 2020. "Factor reallocation and structural transformation implications of grain subsidies in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Cha, Myung Soo, "undated". "Living Standards, Inequality, and Human Development since 1870 : a Review of Evidence," IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH 28438, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.
    6. Bryan Kelly & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Amit Seru & Matt Taddy, 2021. "Measuring Technological Innovation over the Long Run," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 303-320, September.
    7. Erik Berglof, 2016. "European Industrial Policy — Tapping the Full Growth Potential of the EU," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 51(6), pages 335-340, November.
    8. Robert J. Shiller, 2017. "Narrative Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 967-1004, April.
    9. Brendan Walsh, 2017. "Life Expectancy in Ireland since the 1870s," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 48(2), pages 127-143.
    10. Bettina Peters & Rebecca Riley & Iulia Siedschlag & Priit Vahter & John McQuinn, 2018. "Internationalisation, innovation and productivity in services: evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(3), pages 585-615, August.
    11. Justin Yifu Lin, 2010. "Shocks, Crises, and Their Determinants," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 159-176, January.
    12. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2021. "The Schumpeterian creative response: export and innovation: evidence for OECD countries 1995–2015," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(3), pages 803-821, October.
    13. Justin Yifu Lin, 2013. "Demystifying the Chinese Economy," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 46(3), pages 259-268, September.
    14. Ju, Jiandong & Lin, Justin Yifu & Wang, Yong, 2015. "Endowment structures, industrial dynamics, and economic growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 244-263.
    15. Brynjolfsson, Erik & Collis, Avinash & Diewert, W. Erwin & Eggers, Felix & Fox, Kevin J., 2019. "GDP-B: Accounting for the Value of New and Free Goods in the Digital Economy," OSF Preprints sptfu, Center for Open Science.
    16. Seung Mo Choi & Hwagyun Kim & Xiaohan Ma, 2021. "Trade, structural transformation and growth," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1770-1794, June.
    17. Guangjun Shen, 2018. "Computer and Information Technology, Firm Growth, and Industrial Restructuring: Evidence from Manufacturing in the People's Republic of China," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 35(1), pages 133-154, March.
    18. Pi, Jiancai & Zhang, Pengqing, 2021. "Redistribution and wage inequality," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-523.
    19. Dairabayeva Karlygash & Carayannis Elias, 2014. "Targeted Trade-Related Policies and Manufacturing Firm Productivity in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Effect of Corruption," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 265-286, April.
    20. Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, 2014. "Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 183-219, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation and Business Growth;

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.