IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2022v2p4-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Shortcomings Of The Cap 2014 - 2020 From The Environmental And Climate Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Ciobanu

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

Abstract

Although, the environmental and climate concerns have been put on the agenda of the CAP, permanent grassland covers have decreased, agricultural greenhouse gas emissions still account for 10 percent of the EU’s total emissions, soils continue to degrade and wildlife numbers decline. Hence, despite the fact that formally the CAP has integrated environmental aspects, the environmental outcomes of this approach have been questioned on multiple fronts. (Heyl K. et al, 2020) As a result, a series of reports and impact studies were carried out with the role of supporting the configuration of the CAP 2021-2027, as an attempt to further mainstream environmental considerations across the new CAP. Taking into account all these elements, this paper analyse descriptively the CAP’s environment and climate elements. The objective is to identify the key challenges that the new CAP have to address considering shortcomings of the CAP 2014 - 2020 from the environmental and climate perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Ciobanu, 2022. "The Shortcomings Of The Cap 2014 - 2020 From The Environmental And Climate Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 4-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2022:v:2:p:4-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2022-02/01_Ciobanu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedrich Heinemann & Stefani Weiss, 2018. "The EU Budget and Common Agricultural Policy Beyond 2020: Seven More Years of Money for Nothing?," EconPol Working Paper 17, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kengyel, Ákos, 2022. "Környezeti és költségvetési szempontok szorításában. A renacionalizálás mint az EU közös agrárpolitikájának lehetséges reformiránya [Under environmental and budgetary constraints: renationalisation," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 721-738.
    2. Lencsés, Enikő & Hegedűs, Szilárd & Bajkó, Norbert, 2023. "Changes In The Performance Of The Agricultural Sector In Hungary Due To The 2008 Economic Crisis And Covid-19 Pandemic," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 16(3), September.
    3. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2021. "Stagnierender Mehrjähriger Finanzrahmen trotz zunehmender Herausforderungen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(2), pages 82-87, February.
    4. Mangirdas Morkunas, 2022. "Measuring the Level of the Youth Informal Economy in Lithuania in 2004–2020," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Alessandro Olper & Daniele Valenti & Valentina Raimondi & Daniele Curzi, 2023. "The EU enlargements treatment effect on agricultural policy," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 1134-1153, June.
    6. Lencsés Enikő & Hegedűs Szilárd & Bajkó Norbert, 2023. "Changes in the performance of the agricultural sector in Hungary due to the 2008 economic crisis and COVID-19 pandemic," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 16(3), pages 367-383, September.
    7. Ákos Kengyel, 2022. "Would Renationalisation and Co-financing of the Common Agricultural Policy Be Justified?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(2), pages 113-119, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2022:v:2:p:4-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.