IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2020v4p54-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax Treatment Of Common Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Teiusan Sorin-Ciprian

    (1 DECEMBRIE 1918 UNIVERSITY OF ALBA IULIA)

Abstract

Accounting provides information on financial performance of an entity. For companies who ows profit tax, it is important to establish the right amount of deductible expenses. According to the current Romanian fiscal law, the taxable profit of a company is calculated as a difference between revenues and expenses registered according to the applicable accounting regulations, adjusted by deducting non-taxable revenues and tax deductions and by adding non-deductible expenses. Also, elements similar to revenues and expenses are taken into account when calculating the taxable profit. The purpose of the paper is to analyze how the common costs can influence the profit tax amount a company has to pay, and to describe the manner how this kind of costs is allocated in the tax calculation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Teiusan Sorin-Ciprian, 2020. "Tax Treatment Of Common Costs," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 54-64, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:4:p:54-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2020-04/06_Teiusan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. European Commission, 2018. "Taxation trends in the European Union: 2018 edition," Taxation trends 2018, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    2. European Fiscal Board (EFB), 2019. "Assessment of EU fiscal rules with a focus on the six and two-pack legislation," Reports 2019, European Fiscal Board.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Séverine MENGUY, 2019. "Does public indebtedness constrain or can it favor economic growth? A simple analytical modeling," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29.
    2. Lejour, Arjan & Massenz, Gabriella, 2020. "Income Shifting and Organizational Form Choice : Evidence from Europe," Discussion Paper 2020-013, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Eirini Andriopoulou & Eleni Kanavitsa & Chrysa Leventi, 2020. "The distributional impact of recurrent immovable property taxation in Greece," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 44(4), pages 505-528.
    4. European Commission, 2018. "Tax Policies in the European Union: 2018 Survey," Taxation Survey 2018, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    5. Dimitris Katsikas, 2024. "Crises, Opportunities, and the Evolution of Greece’s Growth Model in the EMU," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Andreas Eisl, 2020. "The Ambiguous Consensus on Fiscal Rules," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03053976, HAL.
    7. Maciej Wysocki & Cezary Wójcik, 2021. "Fiscal sustainability in the EU after the global crisis: Is there any progress? Evidence from Poland," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3997-4012, July.
    8. Lukas Reiss & Philip Schuster, 2020. "Explaining the evolution of the Austrian implicit tax rate on labor from 1976 to 2016," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 303-341, May.
    9. Jakub Sawulski, 2019. "Who is burdened by taxes in Poland?," IBS Policy Papers 01/2019, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    10. Anna Krajewska, 2019. "Opodatkowanie konsumpcji, pracy i kapitału w krajach Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 41-63.
    11. Jan Priewe, 2020. "Europäische Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion: Grenzwerte für Defizite und Schulden in der Kritik [A Critique of the Caps on Deficits and Debt in the European Monetary Union]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(7), pages 538-544, July.
    12. Petr Janský, 2023. "Corporate Effective Tax Rates for Research and Policy," Public Finance Review, , vol. 51(2), pages 171-205, March.
    13. Martino Tasso, 2020. "Do details matter? An analysis of Italian personal income tax," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1301, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    14. Heikki Oksanen, 2019. "Reforming the Euro Pragmatically: Towards Sustainable Fiscal Policy and a Revamped Eurosystem," CESifo Working Paper Series 7912, CESifo.
    15. Eisl, Andreas, 2020. "The ambiguous consensus on fiscal rules: How ideational ambiguity has facilitated social democratic parties' support of structural deficit rules in the eurozone," MaxPo Discussion Paper Series 20/4, Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo).
    16. Lejour, Arjan & Massenz, Gabriella, 2020. "Income Shifting and Organizational Form Choice : Evidence from Europe," Other publications TiSEM 3138edef-d645-4113-9981-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Hauptmeier, Sebastian & Kamps, Christophe, 2022. "Debt policies in the aftermath of COVID-19 — The SGP’s debt benchmark revisited," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Burlon, L. & Notarpietro, A. & Pisani, M., 2021. "Fiscal devaluation and labor market frictions in a monetary union," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 135-156.
    19. Angelopoulos, Angelos & Economides, George & Liontos, George & Philippopoulos, Apostolis & Sakkas, Stelios, 2022. "Public redistributive policies in general equilibrium: An application to Greece," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    20. Hauptmeier, Sebastian & Leiner-Killinger, Nadine & Muggenthaler, Philip & Haroutunian, Stephan, 2022. "Post-COVID fiscal rules: a central bank perspective," Working Paper Series 2656, European Central Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:4:p:54-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.