IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlswr/v16y2021i4id29-2021-swr.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early changes in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former agricultural land

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Vopravil

    (Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic
    Department of Land Use and Improvement, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Formánek

    (Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jaroslava Janků

    (Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Ondřej Holubík

    (Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Tomáš Khel

    (Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Afforestation of less productive, risky and degraded agricultural land is one of the methods which is recommended for practical agriculture to increase the carbon sequestration. In this study, we have attempted to determine the effect of afforestation of agricultural land (warm, mildly dry climatic region of the Czech Republic) on the soil organic carbon (Cox) concentrations in the mineral soil. Two soil types (Haplic Chernozem and Haplic Cambisol) were afforested. Both an indirect estimation (loss-on-ignition method) as well as chromsulfuric acid mixture oxidation were used to determine the organic carbon content in the soil samples and the methods were compared. In the case of the Haplic Chernozem, the Cox concentration at a depth of 0-10 cm after 1-3 years of afforestation with pedunculate oak or Scots pine significantly decreased (P < 0.01 and P < 0.004, respectively) with the stand age. Similar to the case of the Haplic Chernozem, the Cox concentration in the Haplic Cambisol also significantly decreased in the variants with Scots pine (P < 0.003) or a mixture of forest tree species (P < 0.006); no significant (P > 0.05) decrease was found in the case of a mixture of forest tree species on the Haplic Chernozem or with Douglas fir on the Haplic Cambisol. Significantly higher (P < 0.05) Cox concentrations were typically found in the case of 1-year-old stands compared to 2-year-old or 3-year-old stands. A higher Cox loss than the quantity of residues returned to the soils may be the reason the soil Cox concentration significantly (P < 0.00001 and P < 0.000001) decreased for the control agricultural plots (Haplic Chernozem and Haplic Cambisol). The carbon stock in the upper 10 cm of the 5-year-old stands was higher on the Haplic Chernozem and lower on the Haplic Cambisol compared to the control agricultural plots.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Vopravil & Pavel Formánek & Jaroslava Janků & Ondřej Holubík & Tomáš Khel, 2021. "Early changes in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former agricultural land," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16(4), pages 228-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:16:y:2021:i:4:id:29-2021-swr
    DOI: 10.17221/29/2021-SWR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2021-SWR.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2021-SWR.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/29/2021-SWR?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shirley LAMPTEY & Lingling LI & Junhong XIE, 2018. "Impact of nitrogen fertilization on soil respiration and net ecosystem production in maize," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(8), pages 353-360.
    2. Ondřej HOLUBÍK & Vilém PODRÁZSKÝ & Jan VOPRAVIL & Tomáš KHEL & Jiří REMEŠ, 2014. "Effect of agricultural lands afforestation and tree species composition on the soil reaction, total organic carbon and nitrogen content in the uppermost mineral soil profile," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 192-200.
    3. J. Vopravil & V. Podrázský & M. Batysta & P. Novák & L. Havelková & M. Hrabalíková, 2015. "Identification of agricultural soils suitable for afforestation in the Czech Republic using a soil database," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 141-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tibor József Novák, 2022. "Afforestation affects vertical distribution of basic soil characteristics and taxonomic status of sodic soils," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(5), pages 245-252.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivo KUPKA & Martin BALÁŠ & Stanislav MILTNER, 2018. "Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in arid areas of North-Western Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(2), pages 53-58.
    2. Jan Vopravil & Pavel Formánek & Darina Heřmanovská & Tomáš Khel & Karel Jacko, 2021. "The impact of agricultural land afforestation on soil water content in Central Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(11), pages 512-521.
    3. Channa Suraweera & Martin Baláš & Josef Gallo & Giuseppe D'Andrea & Stanislav Vacek & Jiří Remeš, 2023. "Intensive initial care of silver fir using improving compounds: A way to support diverse forests?," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(5), pages 179-192.
    4. Josef Gallo & Martin Baláš & Rostislav Linda & Ivan Kuneš, 2017. "Growth performance and resistance to ground late frosts of Fagus sylvatica L. plantation treated with a brassinosteroid compound," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(3), pages 117-125.
    5. Jan Vopravil & Pavel Formánek & Darina Heřmanovská & Tomáš Khel & Karel Jacko, 2022. "The impact of agricultural land afforestation on air temperatures near the surface," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(12), pages 485-495.
    6. Martin Baláš & Josef Gallo & Marcin Czacharowski & Michal Pástor & Jaroslav Jankovič & Igor Štefančík & Ivan Kuneš & Hubert Hasenauer, 2024. "Administrative system of afforestation in the Czech Republic: A long journey to a new forest," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 41-63.
    7. Jiří Holátko & Ondřej Holubík & Tereza Hammerschmiedt & Jan Vopravil & Antonín Kintl & Martin Brtnický, 2022. "Afforestation of agricultural land affects soil structural stability and related preconditions to resist drought," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(12), pages 496-508.
    8. Tibor József Novák, 2022. "Afforestation affects vertical distribution of basic soil characteristics and taxonomic status of sodic soils," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(5), pages 245-252.
    9. Chunming Jiang & Wantai Yu, 2019. "Maize production and field CO2 emission under different straw return rates in Northeast China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 198-204.
    10. V. Podrázský & M. Fulín & H. Prknová & F. Beran & M. Třeštík, 2016. "Changes of agricultural land characteristics as a result of afforestation using introduced tree species," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(2), pages 72-79.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:16:y:2021:i:4:id:29-2021-swr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.