IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlswr/v14y2019i3id71-2018-swr.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon pool in soil under organic and conventional farming systems

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Hábová

    (Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriScience, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Lubica Pospíšilová

    (Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriScience, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Hlavinka

    (Department of Agro systems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriScience, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
    Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Miroslav Trnka

    (Department of Agro systems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriScience, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
    Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Gabriela Barančíková

    (National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Zuzana Tarasovičová

    (National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Jozef Takáč

    (National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Štefan Koco

    (National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Ladislav Menšík

    (Division of Crop Management Systems, Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Nerušil

    (Division of Crop Management Systems, Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Changes in the agricultural management and climatic changes within the past 25 years have had a serious impact on soil organic matter content and contribute to different carbon storage in the soil. Prediction of soil carbon pool, validation, and quantification of different models is important for sustainable agriculture in the future and for this purpose a long-term monitoring data set is required. RothC-26.3 model was applied for carbon stock simulation within two different climatic scenarios (hot-dry with rapid temperature increasing and warm-dry with less rapid temperature increasing). Ten years experimental data set have been received from conventional and organic farming of experimental plots of Mendel University School Enterprise (locality Vatín, Czech-Moravian Highland). Average annual temperature in this area is 6.9°C, average annual precipitation 621 mm, and altitude 530 m above sea level. Soil was classified as Eutric Cambisol, sandy loam textured, with middle organic carbon content. Its cumulative potential was assessed as high. Results showed linear correlation between carbon stock and climatic scenario, and mostly temperature and type of soil management has influenced carbon stock. In spite of lower organic carbon inputs under organic farming this was less depending on climatic changes. Conventional farming showed higher carbon stock during decades 2000-2100 because of higher carbon input. Besides conventional farming was more affected by temperature.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Hábová & Lubica Pospíšilová & Petr Hlavinka & Miroslav Trnka & Gabriela Barančíková & Zuzana Tarasovičová & Jozef Takáč & Štefan Koco & Ladislav Menšík & Pavel Nerušil, 2019. "Carbon pool in soil under organic and conventional farming systems," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 14(3), pages 145-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:14:y:2019:i:3:id:71-2018-swr
    DOI: 10.17221/71/2018-SWR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/71/2018-SWR.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/71/2018-SWR.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/71/2018-SWR?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Megan B. Machmuller & Marc G. Kramer & Taylor K. Cyle & Nick Hill & Dennis Hancock & Aaron Thompson, 2015. "Emerging land use practices rapidly increase soil organic matter," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-5, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakub Prudil & Lubica Pospíšilová & Tamara Dryšlová & Gabriela Barančíková & Vladimír Smutný & Luboš Sedlák & Pavel Ryant & Petr Hlavinka & Miroslav Trnka & Ján Halas & Štefan Koco & Jozef Takáč & Kat, 2023. "Assessment of carbon sequestration as affected by different management practices using the RothC model," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(11), pages 532-544.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aguilera, Eduardo & Díaz-Gaona, Cipriano & García-Laureano, Raquel & Reyes-Palomo, Carolina & Guzmán, Gloria I. & Ortolani, Livia & Sánchez-Rodríguez, Manuel & Rodríguez-Estévez, Vicente, 2020. "Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region. A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Wang, Tong & Jin, Hailong & Kreuter, Urs & Teague, Richard, 2021. "Expanding grass-based agriculture on marginal land in the U.S. Great Plains: The role of management intensive grazing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Wang, Xiuyuan & Shen, Lei & Liu, Tingting & Wei, Wenwen & Zhang, Shuai & Tuerti, Tayir & Li, Luhua & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "Juvenile plumcot tree can improve fruit quality and economic benefits by intercropping with alfalfa in semi-arid areas," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Nikolaos V. Paranychianakis & Giorgos Giannakis & Daniel Moraetis & Vasileios A. Tzanakakis & Nikolaos P. Nikolaidis, 2021. "Crop Litter Has a Strong Effect on Soil Organic Matter Sequestration in Semi-Arid Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Bardsley, Nicholas, 2021. "Recent Advances in Biofarming Show Potential for Rapid Soil Restoration, with Carbon, Health and Livelihoods Benefits," MPRA Paper 121184, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Sklenicka, Petr & Zouhar, Jan & Molnarova, Kristina Janeckova & Vlasak, Josef & Kottova, Blanka & Petrzelka, Peggy & Gebhart, Michal & Walmsley, Alena, 2020. "Trends of soil degradation: Does the socio-economic status of land owners and land users matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Martin C. Parlasca & Matin Qaim, 2022. "Meat Consumption and Sustainability," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 17-41, October.
    8. Subash Dahal & Dorcas Franklin & Anish Subedi & Miguel Cabrera & Dennis Hancock & Kishan Mahmud & Laura Ney & Cheolwoo Park & Deepak Mishra, 2020. "Strategic Grazing in Beef-Pastures for Improved Soil Health and Reduced Runoff-Nitrate-A Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Fatima Haque & Yi Wai Chiang & Rafael M. Santos, 2019. "Alkaline Mineral Soil Amendment: A Climate Change ‘Stabilization Wedge’?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Wu, Chen-Fa & Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Chen, Szu-Hung & Trac, Luu Van Thong, 2024. "Assessing the efficiency of bird habitat conservation strategies in farmland ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    11. Csikós, Nándor & Tóth, Gergely, 2023. "Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:14:y:2019:i:3:id:71-2018-swr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.