IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v67y2021i6id99-2020-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forestry violations as a global issue of legal regulation in the field of forest control and supervision: the Krasnodar territory and the Republic of Bashkortostan case study

Author

Listed:
  • Radmir Iksanov

    (Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education, Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, Russia)

  • Olga Khalikova

    (Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education, Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, Russia)

  • Igor Vladimirov

    (Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education, Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, Russia)

  • Ravil Gizzatullin

    (Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education, Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, Russia)

  • Regina Baiturina

    (Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education, Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, Russia)

  • Vitaliy Kovshov
  • Aigul Selezneva

    (Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education, Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, Russia)

  • Sofya Khasanova

    (Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education, Bashkir State Agrarian University, Ufa, Russia)

Abstract

Control and supervision activities in the field of forest management are a type of activity of state authorities to detect, prevent forest violations. The purpose of this study is to analyse the dynamics and nature of violations in the forest sector on the example and in comparison of such regions of Russia as the Krasnodar territory and the Republic of Bashkortostan. The research methodology is selected taking into account the characteristics of the object under study. With the assistance of employees of the environmental inspectorate, search operations were organized in the areas where the greatest amount of forest damage occurs in the studied regions. The authors concluded that one of the reasons for the existing problems is the lack of interest of the state in the development of this sector of economy. The paper focuses on specific types of forest violations and the problems of their prevention. The authors believe that illegal logging belongs to the most common and socially dangerous forest violations. The article concludes that when adopting new regulations for control and supervisory activities in the field of forest management, the legislator must take into account requirements of administrative reform, regulatory guillotine, and risk-based approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Radmir Iksanov & Olga Khalikova & Igor Vladimirov & Ravil Gizzatullin & Regina Baiturina & Vitaliy Kovshov & Aigul Selezneva & Sofya Khasanova, 2021. "Forestry violations as a global issue of legal regulation in the field of forest control and supervision: the Krasnodar territory and the Republic of Bashkortostan case study," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 272-284.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:67:y:2021:i:6:id:99-2020-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/99/2020-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/99/2020-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/99/2020-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/99/2020-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Christian P. & Rutt, Rebecca & Acheampong, Emmanuel, 2018. "‘Experimental’ or business as usual? Implementing the European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreement in Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 75-82.
    2. Gençay, Gökçe & Mercimek, Anıl, 2019. "Public Consciousness and Influence of Law on Forest Crimes: Insights from Kastamonu, Turkey," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Johnson Gaither, Cassandra & Yembilah, Rita & Samar, Sparkler Brefo, 2019. "Tree registration to counter elite capture of forestry benefits in Ghana’s Ashanti and Brong Ahafo regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 340-349.
    4. Erbaugh, James T., 2019. "Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Escobedo, Francisco J. & Clerici, Nicola & Staudhammer, Christina L. & Feged-Rivadeneira, Alejandro & Bohorquez, Juan Camilo & Tovar, German, 2018. "Trees and Crime in Bogota, Colombia: Is the link an ecosystem disservice or service?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 583-592.
    6. Subhan Mollick, Abdus & Khalilur Rahman, Md. & Nabiul Islam Khan, Md. & Nazmus Sadath, Md., 2018. "Evaluation of good governance in a participatory forestry program: A case study in Madhupur Sal forests of Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 123-137.
    7. Chankrajang, Thanyaporn, 2019. "State-community property-rights sharing in forests and its contributions to environmental outcomes: Evidence from Thailand's community forestry," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 261-273.
    8. Tricallotis, Marcos & Gunningham, Neil & Kanowski, Peter, 2018. "The impacts of forest certification for Chilean forestry businesses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 82-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trejos, Bernardo & Flores, Juan Carlos, 2021. "Influence of property rights on performance of community-based forest devolution policies in Honduras," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Jakub Michal & David Březina & Dalibor Šafařík & Václav Kupčák & Andrea Sujová & Jitka Fialová, 2019. "Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Olegas Beriozovas & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Marius Aleinikovas, 2024. "Research Advancement in Forest Property Rights: A Thematic Review over Half a Decade Using Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Abdullah Al Mamun & Syed Ali Fazal & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Ganeshsree Selvachandran & Noor Raihani Zainol & Quek Shio Gai, 2020. "The Underlying Drivers of Underprivileged Households’ Intention and Behavior towards Community Forestry Management: A Study Using Structural Equation Modelling and Artificial Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Zubizarreta, Mikel & Arana-Landín, Germán & Siguenza, Waleska & Cuadrado, Jesús, 2024. "Forest certification and its impact on business management and market performance: The key role of motivations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Saraswati Sisriany & Katsunori Furuya, 2024. "Understanding the Spatial Distribution of Ecotourism in Indonesia and Its Relevance to the Protected Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Ullah, S M Asik & Tani, Masakazu & Tsuchiya, Jun & Rahman, M.Abiar & Moriyama, Masao, 2022. "Impact of protected areas and co-management on forest cover: A case study from Teknaf Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. World Bank, 2020. "Chile’s Forests," World Bank Publications - Reports 33894, The World Bank Group.
    9. Ramdani, Rijal & Lounela, Anu K., 2020. "Palm oil expansion in tropical peatland: Distrust between advocacy and service environmental NGOs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Killian, Bernadeta & Hyle, Maija, 2020. "Women's marginalization in participatory forest management: Impacts of responsibilization in Tanzania," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    11. Rong Fan & Junxi Fan & Jiayu Song & Kaiyuan Li & Wenli Ji, 2021. "Naturalness in the City: Demographic Groups’ Differences in Preference for Deciduous Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Takahashi, Ryo & Otsuka, Keijiro & Tilahun, Mesfin & Birhane, Emiru & Holden, Stein, 2024. "Beyond Ostrom: Randomized experiment of the impact of individualized tree rights on forest management in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Lemes, Pedro G. & Zanuncio, José C. & Jacovine, Laércio A.G. & Wilcken, Carlos F. & Lawson, Simon A., 2021. "Forest Stewardship Council and Responsible Wood certification in the integrated pest management in Australian forest plantations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Khanal, Ghanashyam & Zhang, Daowei & Prestemon, Jeffrey P., 2024. "A gravity model analysis of trade regulations on wood products exports: Evidence from Cameroon, Ghana, and the republic of Congo," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. Adams, Marshall Alhassan & Kayira, Jean & Tegegne, Yitagesu Tekle & Gruber, James S., 2020. "A comparative analysis of the institutional capacity of FLEGT VPA in Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Ghana, Liberia, and the Republic of the Congo," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Halalisan, Florin & Romero, Claudia & Popa, Bogdan & Arana Landin, German & Talpa, Nicolae & ABRUDAN, Ioan Vasile, 2023. "Global assessment of FSC forest management certification auditing through analysis of accreditation reports," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Dona Octavia & Sri Suharti & Murniati & I Wayan Susi Dharmawan & Hunggul Yudono Setio Hadi Nugroho & Bambang Supriyanto & Dede Rohadi & Gerson Ndawa Njurumana & Irma Yeny & Aditya Hani & Nina Mindawat, 2022. "Mainstreaming Smart Agroforestry for Social Forestry Implementation to Support Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    18. Arts, Bas & Heukels, Bas & Turnhout, Esther, 2021. "Tracing timber legality in practice: The case of Ghana and the EU," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Yi, Yuanyuan & Xu, Jintao & Köhlin, Gunnar & Deininger, Klaus, 2020. "Devolution and Collective Action in Forest Management: The Case of China," EfD Discussion Paper 20-21, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    20. Yitagesu Tekle Tegegne & Mathias Cramm & Jo Van Brusselen, 2018. "Sustainable Forest Management, FLEGT, and REDD+: Exploring Interlinkages to Strengthen Forest Policy Coherence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:67:y:2021:i:6:id:99-2020-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.