IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v70y2024i5id221-2023-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subsidy policies for the grain supply chain considering postharvest loss of grain and agricultural pollutant emission in China

Author

Listed:
  • Pan Liu

    (Management Science and Engineering, School of Information and Management Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, P. R. China)

  • Bin Zhao

    (Logistics Engineering Management, School of Information and Management Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, P. R. China)

  • Haodong Tang

    (Logistics Engineering Management, School of Information and Management Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, P. R. China)

  • Jiamin Zhu

    (Management Science and Engineering, School of Information and Management Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, P. R. China)

Abstract

To reduce agricultural pollutant emission (APE) and postharvest loss of grain (PHLG), the Chinese government enacted a series of subsidy policies; however, the profit-oriented supply chain members are seriously lacking or reducing APE and PHLG efforts. To address this issue, we considered as the research objective a grain supply chain consisting of a producer, a retailer and the government. We proposed the concept and functional expressions of supply chain members' reduction efforts for APE and PHLG. We then proposed two main variables: the environmental innovation subsidy coefficient and the quantity attenuation factor of grain. According to the actual situation, four investment subsidy models were proposed. The results showed the following: i) supply chain members' equilibrium prices and incomes were negatively correlated with the degree of the producer's APE effort regardless of whether the supply chain members were investing in PHLG technology; ii) when the government subsidises APE and PHLG technology for other supply chain members, the government should stop subsidising the retailer's inputs in reduction loss technology to ensure that the government's own interests are not damaged; iii) the government's income was restricted by the degree of its subsidising of other supply chain members. This study provides a theoretical support for the government to formulate appropriate policies to reduce APE and PHLG, which is important for maintaining national food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan Liu & Bin Zhao & Haodong Tang & Jiamin Zhu, 2024. "Subsidy policies for the grain supply chain considering postharvest loss of grain and agricultural pollutant emission in China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(5), pages 207-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:5:id:221-2023-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/221/2023-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/221/2023-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/221/2023-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/221/2023-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cattaneo, Andrea & Federighi, Giovanni & Vaz, Sara, 2021. "The environmental impact of reducing food loss and waste: A critical assessment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Jeremiás Máté Balogh, 2023. "The impacts of agricultural subsidies of Common Agricultural Policy on agricultural emissions: The case of the European Union," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 140-150.
    3. Kuiper, Marijke & Cui, Hao David, 2021. "Using food loss reduction to reach food security and environmental objectives – A search for promising leverage points," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Mary O. Agboola & Festus V. Bekun, 2019. "Does Agricultural Value Added Induce Environmental Degradation? Empirical Evidence from an Agrarian Country," Research Africa Network Working Papers 19/040, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    5. Chatterjee, Somdeep, 2018. "Storage infrastructure and agricultural yield: Evidence from a capital investment subsidy scheme," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-19.
    6. Gregory C. Chow, 2011. "Economic Analysis And Policies For Environmental Problems," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 339-348, August.
    7. Omotilewa, Oluwatoba J. & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Ainembabazi, John Herbert & Shively, Gerald E., 2018. "Does improved storage technology promote modern input use and food security? Evidence from a randomized trial in Uganda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 176-198.
    8. Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Jones, Michael, 2015. "Does storage technology affect adoption of improved maize varieties in Africa? Insights from Malawi’s input subsidy program," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 92-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Na & Olsen, Tava & Liu, Yanping & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Reducing food loss and waste in supply chain operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Małgorzata Karwowska & Sylwia Łaba & Krystian Szczepański, 2021. "Food Loss and Waste in Meat Sector—Why the Consumption Stage Generates the Most Losses?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Christopher Mutungi & Julius Manda & Shiferaw Feleke & Adebayo Abass & Mateete Bekunda & Irmgard Hoschle-Zeledon & Gundula Fischer, 2023. "Adoption and impacts of improved post-harvest technologies on food security and welfare of maize-farming households in Tanzania: a comparative assessment," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1023, August.
    4. Wouter Zant, 2022. "Two Birds with One Stone: Technology Adoption and Market Participation through Protection against Crop Failure," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-091/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    5. Kazushi Takahashi & Rie Muraoka & Keijiro Otsuka, 2020. "Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 31-45, January.
    6. Fredrick Bagamba & Proscovia R. Ntakyo & Geoffrey Otim & David J. Spielman & Bjorn Van Campenhout, 2023. "Policy and performance in Uganda's seed sector: Opportunities and challenges," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(3), May.
    7. Aker, Jenny C. & Dillon, Brian & Welch, C. Jamilah, 2023. "Demand, supply and long-term adoption: Evidence from a storage technology in West Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Usman, Muhammad & Makhdum, Muhammad Sohail Amjad, 2021. "What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 12-28.
    9. Lina Liang & Hongjia Wang & Heju Huai & Xiumei Tang, 2024. "Study of the Decoupling Patterns between Agricultural Development and Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Beijing Tianjin Hebei Region from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Xincai Gao & Lin Ji & Abbas Ali Chandio & Amber Gul & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Fayyaz Ahmad, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Agriculture in China: Assessing the Robust Role of Green Public Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. repec:lic:licosd:42020 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Wouter Zant, 2023. "How costly is using livestock as a savings device?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 77-110, February.
    13. Enid M. Katungi & Catherine Larochelle & Josephat R. Mugabo & Robin Buruchara, 2018. "The effect of climbing bean adoption on the welfare of smallholder common bean growers in Rwanda," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(1), pages 61-79, February.
    14. Abdelaziz Boukhelkhal, 2022. "Energy use, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Africa: does the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis exist? New evidence from heterogeneous panel under cross-sectional dependence," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13083-13110, November.
    15. Devesh Singh & Sunil Kumar Dhiman, 2023. "The linkage between carbon emissions, foreign direct investment, economic growth, and gross value added," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(1), pages 156-176, March.
    16. Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Abu Hanifa Md. Noman & Rulia Akhtar & Sonia Kumari A/P Selvarajan & Abdullah Al‐Mamun, 2024. "Does credit growth mitigate emission intensity in ASEAN countries?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1324-1349, March.
    17. Michael Bernardi & Christa Hainz & Paulina Maier & Maria Waldinger, 2023. "A “Green Revolution” for Sub-Saharan Africa? Challenges and Opportunities," EconPol Policy Brief 54, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    18. Kadjo, Didier & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Alexander, Corinne, 2016. "Estimating Price Discounts for Low-Quality Maize in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Benin," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 115-128.
    19. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Yanqing Duan & Tahmina Ajmal & Katarzyna Pelc & James Gillespie & Sahar Ahmadzadeh & Joan Condell & Imke Hermens & Usha Ramanathan, 2023. "Motivations and Challenges for Food Companies in Using IoT Sensors for Reducing Food Waste: Some Insights and a Road Map for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Schwab, Benjamin & Yu, Jisang, 2022. "Guaranteed Storage? Risk and Credit Constraints in the Demand for Postharvest Technology and Rice Seed Storage Decisions in Bangladesh," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322475, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    21. Michael Bernardi & Christa Hainz & Paulina Maier & Maria Waldinger, 2023. "Eine „Grüne Revolution“ in Subsahara-Afrika? Herausforderungen und Chancen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 76(05), pages 29-33, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:5:id:221-2023-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.