IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v67y2021i4id444-2020-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New dimension of logistics innovations development in agricultural enterprises in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Ľuboslav Szabo

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic)

  • Patrik Richnák

    (Department of Production Management and Logistics, Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic)

  • Klaudia Gubová

    (Department of Production Management and Logistics, Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The research article's primary aim was to provide a comprehensive and systematic view of a new dimension of logistics in the form of logistics innovations in agricultural enterprises in Slovakia. The intention thereof was to define and then analyse selected logistics innovations in agricultural enterprises. The research object was formed by 95 agricultural enterprises in Slovakia. A questionnaire was used as the research instrument. MS Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 20 were used to process the data in the questionnaire. The univariate descriptive statistics and multivariate descriptive statistics were used to interpret the data. The research results were tested and evaluated by means of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Medium-sized agricultural enterprises in Slovakia represented the largest segment (68%) of the study. The agricultural enterprises mostly understand the use of smart technologies as an innovation in logistics (mean = 4.43). The results of the research showed that the analysed agricultural enterprises intend to innovate mainly the production logistics (mean = 3.20). Out of the logistics processes, the agricultural enterprises want to innovate mostly the inventory management (mean = 4.55). Lean logistics is the most frequently implemented logistics innovation in agricultural enterprises (mean = 3.64). The hypothesis testing has proven that there is a statistically significant relationship between the utilisation of lean logistics and production logistics innovation. In addition, it was proven that there is a statistically significant relationship between the utilisation of radio frequency identification (RFID) and the logistics process innovation - inventory management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ľuboslav Szabo & Patrik Richnák & Klaudia Gubová, 2021. "New dimension of logistics innovations development in agricultural enterprises in Slovakia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 136-143.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:67:y:2021:i:4:id:444-2020-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/444/2020-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/444/2020-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/444/2020-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/444/2020-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juzhi Zhang & Tsan‐Ming Choi & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Stochastic production capacity: A bane or a boon for quick response supply chains?," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(2), pages 126-146, March.
    2. Milada Šťastná & Veronika Peřinková & Pavla Pokorná & Antonín Vaishar, 2019. "New Approach to Sustainability in Rural Areas Comprising Agriculture Practices–Analysis of Demonstration Farms in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. A. de Janvry & E. Sadoulet, 2002. "World Poverty and the Role of Agricultural Technology: Direct and Indirect Effects," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 1-26.
    4. Feng Tao & Tijun Fan & Kin Keung Lai & Lin Li, 2017. "Impact of RFID technology on inventory control policy," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 207-220, February.
    5. Yuan Fang & Yahong Fan & Dehong Yu & Jing Shen & Wankun Jiang & Degui Yu, 2020. "Impact of farmers' benefits linking stability on cloud farm platform of company to farmer model," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 424-433.
    6. Petr BIELIK & Daniela HUPKOVÁ & Matúš VADOVIČ & Vladimír BENDA, 2010. "Agricultural basic industry subjects productivity development examination in the region Trnava (SR) by adopting the Malmquist indexes," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(3), pages 108-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kubitza, Christoph & Dib, Jonida Bou & Kopp, Thomas & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Nuryartono, Nunung & Qaim, Matin & Romero, Miriam & Klasen, Stephan, 2019. "Labor savings in agriculture and inequality at different spatial scales: The expansion of oil palm in Indonesia," EFForTS Discussion Paper Series 26, University of Goettingen, Collaborative Research Centre 990 "EFForTS, Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)".
    2. Munir Ahmad, 2003. "Agricultural Productivity, Efficiency, and Rural Poverty in Irrigated Pakistan: A Stochastic Production FrontiermAnalysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 42(3), pages 219-248.
    3. Salasan, Cosmin & Fritzsch, Jana, 2009. "The role of agriculture for overcoming rural poverty in Romania," IAMO Discussion Papers 121, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Suyuan Luo & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2024. "Great partners: how deep learning and blockchain help improve business operations together," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 53-78, August.
    5. Júlio Vicente Cateia & Maurício Vaz Lobo Bittencourt & Terciane Sabadini Carvalho & Luc Savard, 2023. "Funding schemes for infrastructure investment and poverty alleviation in Africa: Evidence from Guinea‐Bissau," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), pages 1505-1529, August.
    6. Kasirye, Ibrahim, 2013. "Constraints to Agricultural Technology Adoption in Uganda: Evidence from the 2005/06-2009/10 Uganda National Panel Survey," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Fung, Yi-Ning & Chan, Hau-Ling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Liu, Rong, 2021. "Sustainable product development processes in fashion: Supply chains structures and classifications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Julius Mukarati & Itumeleng P. Mongale & Godswill Makombe, 2020. "Land redistribution and the South African economy," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(1), pages 46-54.
    9. Mohamed Ali Marouani & Marc Raffinot, 2004. "Perspectives on growth and poverty reduction in Mali," Working Papers DT/2004/05, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    10. Gelan, Ayele Ulfata, 2007. "Does food aid have disincentive effects on local production? A general equilibrium perspective on food aid in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 436-458, August.
    11. Tao Xiang & Jikun Huang & d’Artis Kancs & Scott Rozelle & Jo Swinnen, 2012. "Food Standards and Welfare: General Equilibrium Effects," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 223-244, June.
    12. Arega D. Alene & V. M. Manyong & Eric F. Tollens & Steffen Abele, 2009. "Efficiency–equity tradeoffs and the scope for resource reallocation in agricultural research: evidence from Nigeria," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Joshi, K. & Joshi, P.K. & Khan, M.T. & Kishore, A., 2018. "Sticky Rice': Variety Inertia in a Technologically Progressive State of India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277529, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2004. "Poverty and Environmental Degradation: Searching for Theoretical Linkages," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 200403, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Oct 2004.
    15. repec:zbw:iamodp:91907 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Igor Krejčí & Pavel Moulis & Jana Pitrová & Ivana Tichá & Ladislav Pilař & Jan Rydval, 2019. "Traps and Opportunities of Czech Small-Scale Beef Cattle Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Pavla Vrabcová & Hana Urbancová, 2022. "Holistic human resource management as a tool for the intergenerational cooperation and sustainable business," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(4), pages 117-126.
    18. Acheampong, Patricia & Owusu, Victor, 2015. "Impact of Improved cassava varieties' adoption on farmers' incomes in Rural Ghana," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 210875, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Mekonnen, Tigist, 2017. "Financing rural households and its impact: Evidence from randomized field experiment data," MERIT Working Papers 2017-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Nikolay VASILIEV & Elsa SUUSTER & Helis LUIK & Rando VÄRNIK & Eduard MATVEEV & Alar ASTOVER, 2011. "Productivity of Estonian dairy farms decline after the accession to the European Union," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(9), pages 457-463.
    21. Makosa, Dan & Takayanagi, Nagatada, 2014. "Improving Rural Livelihood through NERICA Farming: An Inquiry into Najja Sub-county in Central Uganda," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 4(01), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:67:y:2021:i:4:id:444-2020-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.