IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v67y2021i2id412-2020-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How opportunity costs change the view on the viability of farms? Empirical evidence from the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Jindřich Špička

    (Department of Economics of Agrarian Sector, Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Dereník

    (Liaison Agency FADN CZ, Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy targets at supporting small and medium-sized farms. Capping and redistribution of direct payments would have a direct impact on the economic viability of farms. Calculation of economic income is a reasonable way how to calculate the economic viability of firms. However, accounting profit has been preferred for its estimation so far. The article aims to compare the income from accounting and economic point of view and reveal how much the results differ across the EU. The literature review, an empirical analysis based on Farm Accountancy Data Network (2016-2018), and a clustered heat map were applied. The results provide clear evidence of high variability of opportunity costs when calculating the economic viability in the EU, especially between countries with small intensive farms and some post-communist countries where larger farms dominate.

Suggested Citation

  • Jindřich Špička & Petr Dereník, 2021. "How opportunity costs change the view on the viability of farms? Empirical evidence from the EU," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(2), pages 41-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:67:y:2021:i:2:id:412-2020-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/412/2020-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bina Agarwal & Ankush Agrawal, 2017. "Do farmers really like farming? Indian farmers in transition," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 460-478, October.
    2. Radosław PASTUSIAK & Magdalena JASINIAK & Michał SOLIWODA & Joanna STAWSKA, 2017. "What may determine off-farm income? A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(8), pages 380-391.
    3. Glenn Milligan, 1980. "An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(3), pages 325-342, September.
    4. O'Donoghue, Cathal & Devisme, Simon & Ryan, Mary & Conneely, Ricky & Gillespie, Patrick & Vrolijk, Hans, 2016. "Farm economic sustainability in the European Union: A pilot study," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(3), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Wąs, Adam & Sulewski Piotr & Majewski, Edward, 2019. "Methodical and practical aspects of the parity income in the Polish agriculture," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 291527, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    6. Sophia Davidova & Matthew Gorton & Tomas Ratinger & Katarzyna Zawalinska & Belen Iraizoz, 2005. "Farm Productivity and Profitability: A Comparative Analysis of Selected New and Existing EU Member States1," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 47(4), pages 652-674, December.
    7. Katarina Valaskova & George Lazaroiu & Judit Olah & Anna Siekelova & Barbora Lancova, 2019. "How Capital Structure Affects Business Valuation: A Case Study of Slovakia," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(3), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zuzana Hloušková & Michaela Lekešová & Anna Prajerová & Tomáš Doucha, 2022. "Assessing the Economic Viability of Agricultural Holdings with the Inclusion of Opportunity Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Jindrich Spicka & Tomas Hlavsa & Katerina Soukupova & Marie Stolbova, 2019. "Approaches to estimation the farm-level economic viability and sustainability in agriculture: A literature review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(6), pages 289-297.
    3. Tomas Hlavsa & Jindrich Spicka & Marie Stolbova & Zuzana Hlouskova, 2020. "Statistical analysis of economic viability of farms operating in Czech areas facing natural constraints," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(5), pages 193-202.
    4. Hans Vrolijk & Krijn Poppe, 2021. "Cost of Extending the Farm Accountancy Data Network to the Farm Sustainability Data Network: Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Patil, Vikram & Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish & Farrell, Katharine N., 2020. "Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Kim, Junyung & Shah, Asad Ullah Amin & Kang, Hyun Gook, 2020. "Dynamic risk assessment with bayesian network and clustering analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    7. Goethner, Maximilian & Hornuf, Lars & Regner, Tobias, 2021. "Protecting investors in equity crowdfunding: An empirical analysis of the small investor protection act," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. John C. McCabe-Dansted & Arkadii Slinko, 2006. "Exploratory Analysis of Similarities Between Social Choice Rules," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 77-107, January.
    9. Ali Abdelzadeh, 2014. "The Impact of Political Conviction on the Relation Between Winning or Losing and Political Dissatisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    10. Gabriela Cecilia Stanciulescu & Gabriela Nicoleta Diaconescu & Dan Mihnea Diaconescu, 2015. "Health, Spa, Wellness Tourism. What is the Difference?," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 7(3), pages 158-161, September.
    11. Bordt, Michael, 2018. "Discourses in Ecosystem Accounting: A Survey of the Expert Community," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 82-99.
    12. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    13. Swargiary, Prithwiraj & Mahanta, Amarjyoti, 2020. "Changing Pattern of Farm and Non-Farm Livelihood Among the Bodos: A Study in Bodoland Territorial Areas of Assam, India," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 10(02), January.
    14. Hossain, Ferdaus & Onyango, Benjamin M. & Adelaja, Adesoji O. & Schilling, Brian J. & Hallman, William K., 2002. "Uncovering Factors Influencing Public Perceptions Of Food Biotechnology," Research Reports 18178, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
    15. Islam, Md. Mofakkarul & Sarker, Md. Asaduzzaman & Al Mamun, Md. Abdullah & Mamun-ur-Rashid, Md. & Roy, Debashis, 2021. "Stepping Up versus Stepping Out: On the outcomes and drivers of two alternative climate change adaptation strategies of smallholders," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Balepur, Prashant Narayan, 1998. "Impacts of Computer-Mediated Communication on Travel and Communication Patterns: The Davis Community Network Study," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6cb1f85c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Curtiss, Jarmila & Jelínek, Ladislav & Hruška, Martin & Medonos, Tomáš & Vilhelm, Václav, 2013. "The Effect of Heterogeneous Buyers on Agricultural Land Prices: The Case of the Czech Land Market," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 62(2).
    18. Glenn Milligan, 1981. "A monte carlo study of thirty internal criterion measures for cluster analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(2), pages 187-199, June.
    19. Geertsema, Paul & Lu, Helen, 2020. "The correlation structure of anomaly strategies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Layal Christine Lettry, 2023. "Clustering the Swiss Pension Register," FSES Working Papers 529, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:67:y:2021:i:2:id:412-2020-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.