IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v59y2013i9id21-2013-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the agrarian businesses results according to their legal form

Author

Listed:
  • Peter ADAMIŠIN

    (Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Management, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovak Republic)

  • Rastislav KOTULIČ

    (Department of Economic Sciences and Economy, Faculty of Management, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The entry into the new market environment after 1990 marked the beginning of complicated structural, economic and social changes for agricultural companies that brought a measurable improvement in only few aspects of the technical performance and competitiveness. New forms of enterprise were created, the number of subjects increased and their average concentration decreased. Based on the analysis, it is claimed that in the majority of selected economic indicators, there was a significant difference in the reached parameters among the groups of the analyse subjects using land, differentiated according to their legal status. Based on the results of testing, it is possible to claim that business companies show a higher extent of economic success evaluated through the selected economic indicators. Only in one case - the indicator of the amount of subsidies per 1 ha of agricultural land - it is impossible to establish a statistically significant difference. This impossibility in that particular indicator only shows even more notably the fact that business companies are able to manage better than cooperatives even with subsidies per hectare of agricultural land that have not been statistically significantly different.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter ADAMIŠIN & Rastislav KOTULIČ, 2013. "Evaluation of the agrarian businesses results according to their legal form," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 396-402.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:59:y:2013:i:9:id:21-2013-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/21/2013-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/21/2013-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/21/2013-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/21/2013-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deininger, Klaus, 1995. "Collective agricultural production: A solution for transition economies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 1317-1334, August.
    2. E. Matejková & A. Qineti & R. Serenčéš, 2008. "Macroeconomic aspects of the development of Slovak regions in the post-accession period," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(8), pages 367-375.
    3. Jan Pokrivcak & Christophe Crombez & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2006. "The status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 33(4), pages 562-590, December.
    4. Z. Sojková & Z. Kropková & V. Benda, 2008. "Slovak agricultural farms in different regions - comparison of efficiency," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 158-165.
    5. P. Bielik & M. Rajčániová, 2004. "Competitiveness analysis of agricultural enterprises in Slovakia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(12), pages 556-560.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter ADAMIŠIN & Rastislav KOTULIČ & Ivana KRAVČÁKOVÁ VOZÁROVÁ & Roman VAVREK, 2015. "Natural climatic conditions as a determinant of productivity and economic efficiency of agricultural entities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(6), pages 265-274.
    2. Z. Chrastinová, 2008. "Economic differentiation in Slovak agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(11), pages 536-545.
    3. Imre Fertő & László Á Kóczy & Attila Kovács & Balázs R Sziklai, 0. "The power ranking of the members of the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(5), pages 1897-1919.
    4. Wollni, Meike & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2012. "Productive efficiency of specialty and conventional coffee farmers in Costa Rica: Accounting for technological heterogeneity and self-selection," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 67-76.
    5. Anania, Giovanni, 2007. "Multilateral Negotiations, Preferential Trade Agreements and the CAP. What's Ahead?," Working Papers 7283, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    6. James Wangu & Ellen Mangnus & A. C. M. (Guus) van Westen, 2021. "Recognizing Determinants to Smallholders’ Market Orientation and Marketing Arrangements: Building on a Case of Dairy Farming in Rural Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Johan F. M. Swinnen & Liesbeth Dries & Karen Macours, 2005. "Transition and agricultural labor," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 15-34, January.
    8. Schläpfer, Felix & Baur, Ivo, 2017. "Does CAP spending reflect taxpayer preferences? An analysis of expenditures for public goods and income redistribution in relation to preference indicators," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261105, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Eiichi Tomiura & Banri Ito & Hiroshi Mukunoki & Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2016. "Individual Characteristics, Behavioral Biases, and Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey in Japan," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 1081-1095, November.
    10. Rizov, Marian, 2008. "Institutions, reform policies, and productivity growth in agriculture: Evidence from former communist countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 307-323.
    11. Nakajima, Shinsaku & Tahara, Kengo, 2009. "The Choice of Participation Forms in Community-Based Group Farming and Efficiency in Team Production," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51640, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2010. "The Political Economy of the Most Radical Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(Supplemen), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Mathijs, Erik & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 1997. "Agricultural Decollectivization in Central and Eastern Europe," 1997 Conference, August 10-16, 1997, Sacramento, California 197062, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. repec:lic:licosd:21508 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Peter ADAMISIN & Rastislav KOTULIC & Ivana KRAVCAKOVA VOZAROVA, 2017. "Legal form of agricultural entities as a factor in ensuring the sustainability of the economic performance of agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 80-92.
    16. Kym Anderson & Gordon Rausser & Johan Swinnen, 2013. "Political Economy of Public Policies: Insights from Distortions to Agricultural and Food Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(2), pages 423-477, June.
    17. Záhorský, T. & Pokrivčák, J., 2017. "Assessment of the Agricultural Performance in Central and Eastern European Countries," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(1), March.
    18. Johan F. M. Swinnen & Louise Knops & Kristine van Herck, 2013. "Food Price Volatility and EU Policies," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-032, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Knops, Louise & van Herck, Kristine & Swinnen, Johan F. M., 2013. "Food Price Volatility and EU Policies," WIDER Working Paper Series 032, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Thilo Glebe & Klaus Salhofer, 2007. "EU agri‐environmental programs and the “restaurant table effect”," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(2‐3), pages 211-218, September.
    21. Thai Thuy Pham & Ludwig Theuvsen & Verena Otter, 2019. "Determinants of Smallholder Farmers' Marketing Channel Choice: Evidence from the Vietnamese Rice Sector," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 281-300, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:59:y:2013:i:9:id:21-2013-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.