IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/but/manage/v30y2019i1p181-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Volunteering, A Key Factor to Increase the Employment Rate, in the European Context

Author

Listed:
  • Loredana Nicoleta Zainea

    (Doctoral School of Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Paul Marinescu

    (Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Dragos Tohanean

    (Doctoral School of Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

Volunteering is one of the ways to optimize social cohesion, sustainable integration into the labor market, through the creation of the necessary framework for acquiring specific skills and competencies. It will prepare the citizens to face and adapt smoothly to the dynamic changes from the socio-economic environment. The European Union sustain the volunteers by promoting cross-border volunteering and their mobility, in order to develop a European identity, intercultural learning and creativity, by using efficient and effective the limited resources.The aim of the paper is to briefly analyze the ways in which volunteering, education and innovation contribute to achieve the European Union objective related to the employment rate. The authors achieved the objective of the paper by using a quantitative method. In the last decades, in Europe, the demand for highly skilled jobs has increased, also directly proportional the employment rate for the people with a high degree of education, endowed with the necessary abilities and competencies for the knowledge society. The paper highlights that volunteering represents an opportunity to gain new competencies and skills, by enabling the transformation of this knowledge into economic and social innovation which leads to productivity and creation of highly qualified jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Loredana Nicoleta Zainea & Paul Marinescu & Dragos Tohanean, 2019. "Volunteering, A Key Factor to Increase the Employment Rate, in the European Context," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 30(1), pages 181-190, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:but:manage:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:181-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://manager.faa.ro/download/1028_30_m_181_190.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://manager.faa.ro/en/article/Volunteering-A-Key-Factor-to-Increase-the-Employment-Rate-in-the-European-Context~1028.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Professor Paul Marinescu & Sorin-George Toma, 2015. "Strategy and Change," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 21(1), pages 145-150, May.
    2. Philip McCann & Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2013. "Modern regional innovation policy," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 187-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kroll, Henning, 2016. "Understanding the "regional policy mix": A classification and analysis of European regions' support policies," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R1/2016, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    2. Tom Broekel & Lars Mewes, 2017. "Analyzing the impact of R&D policy on regional diversification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1726, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2017.
    3. Moodysson , Jerker & Trippl, Michaela & Zukauskaite, Elena, 2015. "Policy Learning and Smart Specialization Balancing Policy Change and Policy Stability for New Regional Industrial Path Development," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/39, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    4. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2021. "The Potential for Innovative and Smart Rural Development in the Peripheral Regions of Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Lars Mewes & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Subsidized to change? The impact of R&D policy on regional technological diversification," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(1), pages 221-252, August.
    6. Trippl, Michaela & Asheim, Björn & Miorner, Johan, 2015. "Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    7. Qin Ye & Xiaolei Xu, 2021. "Determining factors of cities’ centrality in the interregional innovation networks of China’s biomedical industry," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2801-2819, April.
    8. Prause Gunnar, 2014. "Smart Specialization and EU Eastern Innovation Cooperation: A Conceptual Approach," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 3-19, June.
    9. Arne Isaksen & Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl, 2016. "Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2016_05, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Jakob Edler & Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation policy: what, why, and how," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 2-23.
    11. Sorin-George Toma & Stefan Catana, 2021. "Linking Customer Experience With The Extended Marketing Mix," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 105-109, October.
    12. De Silva, Muthu & Gokhberg, Leonid & Meissner, Dirk & Russo, Margherita, 2021. "Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Leonard Prochaska & Daniel Schiller, 2021. "An evolutionary perspective on the emergence and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policy: the example of the change of the leitmotif from biotechnology to bioeconomy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 141-249, April.
    14. Pasquale Del Vecchio & Gianluca Elia & Valentina Ndou & Giustina Secundo & Fabrizio Specchia, 2017. "Living Lab as an Approach to Activate Dynamic Innovation Ecosystems and Networks: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(05), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Nylund, Petra A. & Amores-Bravo, Xavier & Ferràs-Hernández, Xavier & Brem, Alexander, 2023. "Crisis as a catalyst of idle innovation ecosystems: Evidence from ecosystem exaptation of a water partnership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. Reetta Muhonen & Paul Benneworth & Julia Olmos-Peñuela, 2018. "From productive interactions to impact pathways," CHEPS Working Papers 201802, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
    17. Blanca L. Díaz Mariño & Frida Carmina Caballero-Rico & Ramón Ventura Roque Hernández & José Alberto Ramírez de León & Daniel Alejandro González-Bandala, 2021. "Towards the Construction of Productive Interactions for Social Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    18. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Sorin-George Toma & Stefan-Alexandru Catana & Catalin Gradinaru, 2022. "Competitive Business Strategies In Global Retailing: The Case Of Wal-Mart," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 106-112, February.
    20. Uyarra, Elvira & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Flanagan, Kieron & Magro, Edurne, 2020. "Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:but:manage:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:181-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faaubro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.