IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/buc/jpredm/v8y2014i3p57-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bettor Habits When Point Spreads and Money lines are Offered on the Same Game: The NFL

Author

Listed:
  • Rodney Paul
  • Andrew Weinbach
  • Mark Wilson

Abstract

Bettor preferences and returns are examined in the NFL wagering market where both point spread and money line wagers are simultaneously offered. In both markets, the balanced book hypothesis can be soundly rejected, with bettors preferring favorites. Despite the clear difference in how a winning bet on the favorite is achieved in each market, the percentage bet on the favorite in both the point spread and money line markets correspond nearly one-to-one. Biases are most pronounced in certain subsets of the data, where betting against favorites on both the point spread and money line are shown to reject market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodney Paul & Andrew Weinbach & Mark Wilson, 2014. "Bettor Habits When Point Spreads and Money lines are Offered on the Same Game: The NFL," Journal of Prediction Markets, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 8(3), pages 57-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:buc:jpredm:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:57-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ubplj.org/index.php/jpm/article/view/976
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haoyu Liu & Carl Donovan & Valentin Popov, 2024. "A Comparison between Financial and Gambling Markets," Papers 2409.13528, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Prediction Markets; Literature Review; Streams of Research; Article Classification; Information Markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:buc:jpredm:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:57-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dominic Cortis, University of Malta (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ubpl.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.