IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/zfwige/v62y2018i3-4p201-216n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Food Movements und ihre Forderungen: zur politischen Dimension alternativer Ernährungsgeographien

Author

Listed:
  • Fladvad Benno

    (Geographisches Institut, AG Kulturgeographie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Ludewig-Meyn-Str. 14, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

Abstract

At least since the recent financial and food crisis of 2007 and 2008, the topic of “food” and in particular the right to self-determined food production have become key subjects within contemporary struggles for social justice. Clear signs for this phenomenon are, in both the global north and south, the emergence and increasing networking of several “food movements”, which put forward claims for food justice, food democracy and food sovereignty. Thus, they fight against the neoliberal order and the corporate system of food production. A special feature of these movements is that they do not only engage in “classic” forms of political protest, e.g. demonstrations and campaigns, but also in self-organized and self-determined economic activities such as community-supported agriculture, agro-ecological farming and various arrangements of food sharing. In consideration of the respective literature, I conceptualize these parallel economies as “alternative food geographies”, since they pursue to varying degrees the goal of overcoming the capitalist logic of exploitation and aim at a “re-spatialization” of food production and related supply chains. However, despite the high level of international attention, only a few publications explicitly discuss the normative foundation of the food movements, i.e. the meaning of sovereignty, justice and democracy, which are subject to controversial debates within political theory. This article aims at encouraging a theoretical debate regarding this research gap. Thereby, it focuses on possible contradictions these complex ideals might entail in the context of this thematic area. At the same time, it intends to provide an extended basis for empirical research on the food movements and alternative food geographies. In doing so, I discuss approaches from rural sociology, human geography and political theory and pay special attention to Nancy Fraser´s theory of justice. Originating from Critical Theory, her thoughts offer a differentiated perspective on the multi-faceted content and the contradictory nature of social justice, which also facilitates the examination of the food movements’ claims in their practical unfolding. In addition, Fraser´s theory ties in well with human geography, since it does not only consider the contentual aspects of social justice but also pays attention to its spatial dimension in an era of globalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Fladvad Benno, 2018. "Die Food Movements und ihre Forderungen: zur politischen Dimension alternativer Ernährungsgeographien," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 62(3-4), pages 201-216, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:zfwige:v:62:y:2018:i:3-4:p:201-216:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/zfw-2017-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2017-0010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfw-2017-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martínez-Alier, Joan & Pascual, Unai & Vivien, Franck-Dominique & Zaccai, Edwin, 2010. "Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1741-1747, July.
    2. Rombach, Meike & Bitsch, Vera, 2015. "Food Movements in Germany: Slow Food, Food Sharing, and Dumpster Diving," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Peter Rosset, 2008. "Food Sovereignty and the Contemporary Food Crisis," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 51(4), pages 460-463, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    2. Ricardo Serra Borsatto & Vanilde Ferreira Souza-Esquerdo & Henrique Carmona Duval & Fernando Silveira Franco & Fabio Grigoletto, 2022. "Winning hearts and minds through a policy promoting the agroecological paradigm in universities," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 5-18, March.
    3. Malmaeus, J. Mikael & Alfredsson, Eva C., 2017. "Potential Consequences on the Economy of Low or No Growth - Short and Long Term Perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 57-64.
    4. Xue, Jin, 2014. "Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 130-138.
    5. Katsu Masaki, 2022. "Exploring the ‘Partial Connections’ between Growth and Degrowth Debates: Bhutan’s Policy of Gross National Happiness," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 34(1), pages 86-103, January.
    6. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Jin Xue & Hans Jakob Walnum & Carlo Aall & Petter Næss, 2016. "Two Contrasting Scenarios for a Zero-Emission Future in a High-Consumption Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Järvensivu, Paavo, 2013. "Transforming market–nature relations through an investigative practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 197-205.
    9. Clive L. Spash, 2013. "The Ecological Economics of Boulding's Spaceship Earth," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2013_02, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Traverso, Silvio & Schiavo, Stefano, 2020. "Fair trade or trade fair? International food trade and cross-border macronutrient flows," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Engler, John-Oliver & Kretschmer, Max-Friedemann & Rathgens, Julius & Ament, Joe A. & Huth, Thomas & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2024. "15 years of degrowth research: A systematic review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Chung, Leanne & Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung & Li, Pansy Hon Ying, 2016. "The interaction effects of institutional constraints on managerial intentions and sustainable performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 374-383.
    13. Urhammer, Emil & Røpke, Inge, 2013. "Macroeconomic narratives in a world of crises: An analysis of stories about solving the system crisis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 62-70.
    14. Posse, Dirk, 2015. "Zukunftsfähige Unternehmen in einer Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Eine theoretische und empirische Untersuchung," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 110257, September.
    15. Rezai, Armon & Taylor, Lance & Mechler, Reinhard, 2013. "Ecological macroeconomics: An application to climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 69-76.
    16. Chad M. Baum & Christian Gross, 2017. "Sustainability policy as if people mattered: developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 53-95, April.
    17. Buch-Hansen, Hubert & Nesterova, Iana, 2021. "Towards a science of deep transformations: Initiating a dialogue between degrowth and critical realism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    18. Fritz, Martin & Koch, Max, 2014. "Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 191-199.
    19. Mariusz Dacko & Aleksandra Płonka & Łukasz Satoła & Aneta Dacko, 2021. "Sustainable Development According to the Opinions of Polish Experts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Amanda Rooney & Helen Vallianatos, 2022. "Evidence of Degrowth Values in Food Justice in a Northern Canadian Municipality," Environmental Values, , vol. 31(3), pages 323-343, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:zfwige:v:62:y:2018:i:3-4:p:201-216:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.