IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/soeuro/v72y2024i1p13-32n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaccine as a Sociocultural Artefact: The Example of Locally Produced Polio Vaccine in Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Trifunović Vesna

    (Institute of Ethnography, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The paper argues that vaccines could be viewed as artifacts which communicate various social messages and are used as instruments for fulfilling different sociopolitical goals besides meeting public health needs. It further suggests that such social, cultural and political influences may have real effects on the choices of vaccine technologies or vaccine production, and aims to demonstrate their importance in the area which is normally seen as the domain of objective science. This is demonstrated by using the example of the locally produced oral polio vaccine (OPV) in Serbia during the socialist and post-socialist periods in the country’s history.

Suggested Citation

  • Trifunović Vesna, 2024. "Vaccine as a Sociocultural Artefact: The Example of Locally Produced Polio Vaccine in Serbia," Comparative Southeast European Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 72(1), pages 13-32, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:72:y:2024:i:1:p:13-32:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/soeu-2023-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2023-0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/soeu-2023-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blume, Stuart S., 2005. "Lock in, the state and vaccine development: Lessons from the history of the polio vaccines," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 159-173, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilson, Paul & Post, Sarah & Srinivas, Smita, 2007. "R&D models: lessons from vaccine history," MPRA Paper 52899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Blume, Stuart & Tump, Janneke, 2010. "Evidence and policymaking: The introduction of MMR vaccine in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1049-1055, September.
    3. Ming-Sin Choong & Ying-Che Hsieh & Chan-Yuan Wong, 2024. "Resilient or Resistant: Pandemic Crisis and Early Observations of Different Preventive Capabilities from Cumulativeness of Scientific Research Points of View," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 11976-12005, September.
    4. Yaqub, Ohid, 2017. "Testing regimes in clinical trials: Evidence from four polio vaccine trajectories," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 475-484.
    5. Blume, Stuart & Zanders, Mariska, 2006. "Vaccine independence, local competences and globalisation: Lessons from the history of pertussis vaccines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 1825-1835, October.
    6. Bustamante, Juana & Oughton, Christine & Pesque-Cela, Vanesa & Tobin, Damian, 2023. "Resolving the patents paradox in the era of COVID-19 and climate change: Towards a patents taxonomy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    7. Yaqub, Ohid & Nightingale, Paul, 2012. "Vaccine innovation, translational research and the management of knowledge accumulation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2143-2150.
    8. Beniamino Callegari & Christophe Feder, 2022. "The long-term economic effects of pandemics: toward an evolutionary approach [Epidemics and trust: the case of the Spanish flu]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(3), pages 715-735.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:72:y:2024:i:1:p:13-32:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.