IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pewipo/v15y2014i4p346-354n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Hebesatzpolitik bei der Gewerbesteuer nach den Unternehmensteuerreformen

Author

Listed:
  • Büttner Thiess

    (Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg und CESifo)

  • Scheffler Wolfram

    (Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • von Schwerin Axel

    (Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

Abstract

Das Papier geht der Frage nach, ob der Anstieg der Hebesätze bei der Gewerbesteuer in den letzten Jahren eine Folge der Unternehmensteuerreformen der Jahre 2001 und 2008 ist. Es wird argumentiert, dass durch die Anrechnung der Gewerbesteuer auf die Einkommensteuer die durch viele Mängel gekennzeichnete Gewerbesteuer „subventioniert“ wird. Dies könnte Gemeinden veranlasst haben, den Hebesatz zu erhöhen. Eine Analyse mit Daten der Gewerbesteuerstatistik zeigt, dass tatsächlich Gemeinden mit einem hohen Anteil an Einzelunternehmen und Personengesellschaften nach der weitgehenden Anrechnung der Gewerbesteuer seit 2008 ihren Gewerbesteuerhebesatz im Vergleich zu anderen Gemeinden tendenziell stärker erhöht haben. Dieses Ergebnis legt nahe, dass die Anrechnung der Gewerbesteuer auf die Einkommensteuer die politischen und wirtschaftlichen Kosten eines Anstiegs des Hebesatzes gesenkt hat.

Suggested Citation

  • Büttner Thiess & Scheffler Wolfram & von Schwerin Axel, 2014. "Die Hebesatzpolitik bei der Gewerbesteuer nach den Unternehmensteuerreformen," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 346-354, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:346-354:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/pwp-2014-0028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2014-0028
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/pwp-2014-0028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Keen, 1998. "Vertical Tax Externalities in the Theory of Fiscal Federalism," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 45(3), pages 454-485, September.
    2. Rumpf, Dominik & Wiegard, Wolfgang, 2010. "Kapitalertragsbesteuerung und Kapitalkosten," Working Papers 05/2010, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    3. Thomas Döring & Lars P. Feld, 2005. "Reform der Gewerbesteuer: Wie es Euch gefällt?– Eine Nachlese," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 6(2), pages 207-232, May.
    4. Kerstin Schneider & Claudia Wesselbaum-Neugebauer, 2010. "Die Gewerbesteuer seit der Unternehmensteuerreform 2008: Steigt die Steuerbelastung und die Gefahr der Substanzbesteuerung? Eine empirische Analyse," Schumpeter Discussion Papers sdp10008, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim Scheurer, 2024. "Anreizwirkungen im kommunalen Finanzausgleich Sachsens: Die Kreisumlage im Fokus," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 31(03), pages 14-18, June.
    2. von Schwerin, Axel, 2015. "Effective Burden of Business Taxation and Tax Eff ort of Local Governments," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112955, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. von Schwerin, Axel, 2015. "Effective Burden of Business Taxation and Tax Eff ort of Local Governments," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112955, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Colas, Mark & Saulnier, Emmett, 2023. "Vertical migration externalities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Gijs Roelofs & Daniel Vuuren, 2017. "The Decentralization of Social Assistance and the Rise of Disability Insurance Enrolment," De Economist, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Zodrow, George R, 2003. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 651-671, November.
    5. Berkowitz, Daniel & DeJong, David N., 2002. "Accounting for growth in post-Soviet Russia," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 221-239, March.
    6. Jean-Marc Bourgeon & Marie-Laure Breuillé, 2023. "Citizen preferences and the architecture of government," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 537-585, October.
    7. Bofinger, Peter & Franz, Wolfgang & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Weder di Mauro, Beatrice & Wiegard, Wolfgang, 2010. "Chancen für einen stabilen Aufschwung. Jahresgutachten 2010/11 [Chances for a stable upturn. Annual Report 2010/11]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201011, September.
    8. Tonis Alexander, 2002. "Privileges for Enterprises: Efficient Discrimination or Room for Abuse?," EERC Working Paper Series 02-01e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    9. Melle Marco C., 2014. "Eine europäische Bemessungsgrundlage für die Körperschaftsteuer? Konzeption und ordnungsökonomische Analyse / Conceptual design and constitutional economics analysis of a European tax base for corpora," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 133-156, January.
    10. Florence Lachet-Touya, 2016. "EU tax competition and tax avoidance: A multiprincipal perspective," Working papers of CATT hal-02939340, HAL.
    11. Thierry Madiès & Jean-Jacques Dethier, 2012. "Fiscal Competition In Developing Countries: A Survey Of The Theoretical And Empirical Literature," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-31.
    12. Robin Boadway & Jean-Francois Tremblay, 2005. "A Theory of Vertical Fiscal Imbalance," Working Papers 2006-04, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations.
    13. Per G. Fredriksson & Khawaja A. Mamun, 2014. "Tobacco Politics and Electoral Accountability in the United States," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(1), pages 4-34, January.
    14. Diego Martinez-Lopez & Tomas Sjöngren, 2014. "Vertical externalities with lump-sum taxes: how much difference does unemployment make?," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 3(1), pages 75-87, June.
    15. David Agrawal & Marie-Laure Breuillé & Julie Le Gallo, 2020. "Tax competition with intermunicipal cooperation," Post-Print hal-02949334, HAL.
    16. Lisa Grazzini & Alessandro Petretto, 2006. "Vertical Tax Competition with Tax Sharing and Equalization Grants," Giornale degli Economisti, GDE (Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia), Bocconi University, vol. 65(1), pages 75-94, May.
    17. Geys, Benny & Konrad, Kai A., . "Federalism and optimal allocation across levels of governance," Chapters in Economics,, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    18. Johannes Becker & Michael Kriebel, 2017. "Fiscal equalisation schemes under competition," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(5), pages 800-816, September.
    19. Lucas, Vander, 2004. "Cross-border shopping in a federal economy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 365-385, July.
    20. Sylvie Charlot & Sonia Paty & Virginie Piguet, 2015. "Does Fiscal Cooperation Increase Local Tax Rates in Urban Areas?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(10), pages 1706-1721, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:346-354:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.