IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pepspp/v20y2014i3p17n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Real Effects of Military Spending on Security

Author

Listed:
  • Dumas Lloyd J.

    (School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA)

Abstract

The indirect effects of military spending on security are stronger and more important than its direct effects, and its long run impact more telling than its short run impact. In the short run, military spending can be a source of both physical security and economic stimulus. In the long run, it can be counterproductive in terms of physical security and will be a dead weight on the economy. How a society’s productive resources are deployed, as between military spending and more economically productive activities, sets it on a long-term course with powerful implications for the ability of its economy to do what it is supposed to do – provide for the material well-being of the population as a whole. The mechanism by which the extensive and extended diversion of productive economic resources to economically unproductive military spending drags an economy down is analyzed. Furthermore, it is possible to use properly structured international and domestic economic relationships in place of threats or use of military force to increase national and international security, while at the same time enhancing, rather than degrading, economic wellbeing. Three principles for structuring such a “peacekeeping economy” are set forth.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumas Lloyd J., 2014. "The Real Effects of Military Spending on Security," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:17:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/peps-2014-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2014-0018
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/peps-2014-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peninah Thomson & Tom Lloyd, 2011. "The new world," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Women and the New Business Leadership, chapter 0, pages 24-48, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony Marcus & Amber Horning & Ric Curtis & Jo Sanson & Efram Thompson, 2014. "Conflict and Agency among Sex Workers and Pimps," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 653(1), pages 225-246, May.
    2. Luis Rene Caceres, 2022. "Idle Youth and Macroeconomics in Latin America," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-98, January.
    3. McMahon-Howard, Jennifer & Reimers, Birthe, 2013. "An evaluation of a child welfare training program on the commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-9.
    4. O'Brien, Jennifer & Finkelhor, David & Jones, Lisa, 2022. "Improving services for youth survivors of commercial sexual exploitation: Insights from interventions with other high-risk youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Hielscher, Stefan & Winkin, Jan & Pies, Ingo, 2016. "NGO credibility as private or public good? A governance perspective on how to improve NGO advocacy in public discourse," Discussion Papers 2016-03, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Elizabeth Swanson, 2017. "Freedom, Commerce, Bodies, Harm: The Case of Backpage.com," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 3-15.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:17:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.