IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v5y2017i2p3-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freedom, Commerce, Bodies, Harm: The Case of Backpage.com

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Swanson

    (Arts and Humanities Division, Babson College, USA)

Abstract

This article situates lawsuits against Backpage.com in the context of changing laws and norms of sexual commerce and trafficking, and of evolving legal interpretations of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 has been used repeatedly to shield internet service providers such as Backpage.com from liability for content generated by third parties that has led to criminal harm to others; in this case, the trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation of minors. Moving to a critique of the law as at times grievously detached from the realities it addresses, I compare the legal strategies and decisions in three prominent cases brought against Backpage.com in St. Louis, Tacoma, and Boston, respectively. This critique identifies the evacuation of gendered bodies and the harm done to them from the court opinions as an example of what Robert Cover has called the “interpretive violence” of the law, and of the judges who interpret and dispense it. I conclude by calling for courts and Congress to act together to disrupt the accumulation of interpretive precedent favoring freedom of commerce and speech over the protection of bodies from harm.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Swanson, 2017. "Freedom, Commerce, Bodies, Harm: The Case of Backpage.com," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 3-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v5:y:2017:i:2:p:3-15
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i2.925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/925
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v5i2.925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v5:y:2017:i:2:p:3-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.