IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v52y2001i1p215-238n14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Krise der sozialen Sicherung und die Globalisierung – Politische Mythen und ordnungspolitische Wirklichkeit

Author

Listed:
  • Seliger Bernhard

Abstract

Globalisation means increasing locational competition and factor mobility and thereby endangers current welfare systems, especially the developed welfare states in Western Europe. Technological as well as political developments make institutional alternatives more and more easily available. Competition between welfare systems shows more clearly inherent economic problems of welfare states. Institutional competition is often interpreted rather as a danger for welfare positions once achieved than as a widening of institutional choice. Groups and states under pressure from competition become more and more interested in restrictions of competition and interventions in the market process to guarantee specific economic results. This article analyses the myths about the welfare state in globalisation developed in order to justify such obstacles to competition or interventions in market processes. These political justifications focus on defence against an unsocial global model of capitalism. This capitalism allegedly races to the bottom: social welfare system converge at the lowest possible level. Solidarity in the national economy and the international community of states passes away. Only planful coordination in form of national restrictions of competition or international coordination of welfare standards could stop this process. Restrictions of competition as proposed to escape from the pressure on welfare states lead to institutional sclerosis. Interventions in market processes to guarantee specific results are a presumption of knowledge not available to political deciders and lead to an interventionist spiral. Instead, this article proposes to understand the competition between welfare systems as a chance to find better solutions for social problems. The discovery of viable welfare institutions is possible, if the welfare states open their welfare systems for competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Seliger Bernhard, 2001. "Die Krise der sozialen Sicherung und die Globalisierung – Politische Mythen und ordnungspolitische Wirklichkeit," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 52(1), pages 215-238, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:52:y:2001:i:1:p:215-238:n:14
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2001-0114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2001-0114
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2001-0114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    2. Assar Lindbeck, 1998. "Incentives in the Welfare State: Lessons for Would-be Welfare States," International Economic Association Series, in: Yair Mundlak (ed.), Contemporary Economic Issues, chapter 1, pages 3-24, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Nancy H. Chau & Ravi Kanbur, 2006. "The Race to the Bottom, from the Bottom," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 73(290), pages 193-228, May.
    4. Olson, Mancur, Jr, 1995. "The Devolution of the Nordic and Teutonic Economies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 22-27, May.
    5. Davidson, Paul, 1997. "Are Grains of Sand in the Wheels of International Finance Sufficient to Do the Job When Boulders Are Often Required?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(442), pages 671-686, May.
    6. Sinn, Hans-Werner, 1994. "How Much Europe? Subsidiarity, Centralization and Fiscal Competition," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 41(1), pages 85-107, February.
    7. Berthold, Norbert & Stettes, Oliver, 2000. "Globalisierung und Strukturwandel - droht das Ende des Sozialstaates," Discussion Paper Series 35, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    8. repec:bla:kyklos:v:52:y:1999:i:2:p:239-58 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Takao, Yasuo, 1999. "Welfare State Retrenchment – The Case of Japan," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 265-292, September.
    10. Lindbeck, Assar, 1995. "Hazardous Welfare-State Dynamics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 9-15, May.
    11. Bernhard Seliger, 2001. "Reforming the Welfare State: German and European Experiences and Challenges," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 4(1), pages 63-87, March.
    12. J.H. Dunning, 1995. "The role of foreign direct investment in a globalising economy," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 48(193), pages 125-144.
    13. B.J. McFARLANE & CHRIS NYLAND, 2000. "The Social Impact Of The Asian Economic Crisis And The Response Of The International Regulatory Agencies," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 19(2), pages 75-95, June.
    14. Feldstein, Martin & Horioka, Charles, 1980. "Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 90(358), pages 314-329, June.
    15. J.H. Dunning, 1995. "The role of foreign direct investment in a globalising economy," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 48(193), pages 125-144.
    16. Assar Lindbeck, 1988. "Consequences of the Advanced Welfare State," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 19-38, March.
    17. Bruno S. Frey & Reiner Eichenberger, 1995. "Competition among Jurisdictions: The Idea of FOCJ," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Lüder Gerken (ed.), Competition among Institutions, chapter 8, pages 209-229, Palgrave Macmillan.
    18. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2000. "The viability of advanced welfare states in the international economy. Vulnerabilities and options," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 399-425, July.
    19. Schüller Alfred, 2000. "Soziale Marktwirtschaft und Dritte Wege," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 51(1), pages 169-202, January.
    20. Assar Lindbeck, 1996. "Incentives in the Welfare-State," CESifo Working Paper Series 111, CESifo.
    21. Young Back Choi, 1999. "On the Rich Getting Richer and the Poor Getting Poorer," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 239-258, May.
    22. repec:hhs:iuiwop:449 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. repec:mhr:btrord:urn:isbn:9783163406810 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. John Weicher, 1996. "The Distribution of Wealth," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 650823, September.
    25. Dietl, Helmut & Pauli, Markus & Royer, Susanne, 1999. "Frankfurts Position im internationalen Finanzplatzwettbewerb: Eine ressourcenorientierte Analyse," CFS Working Paper Series 1999/10, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seliger, Bernhard & Wrobel, Ralph M., 2007. "Die Krise der Ordnungspolitik als Kommunikationskrise," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2007-01, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zodrow, George R, 2003. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 651-671, November.
    2. repec:zbw:bofrdp:1997_008 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Melle Marco C., 2014. "Eine europäische Bemessungsgrundlage für die Körperschaftsteuer? Konzeption und ordnungsökonomische Analyse / Conceptual design and constitutional economics analysis of a European tax base for corpora," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 133-156, January.
    4. Wolfgang Kerber & Oliver Budzinski, "undated". "Towards a Differentiated Analysis of Competition of Competition Laws," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2004-1-1090, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    5. Magnus Henrekson & Jesper Roine, 2007. "Promoting Entrepreneurship in the Welfare State," Chapters, in: David B. Audretsch & Isabel Grilo & A. Roy Thurik (ed.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Wolfgang Kerber, 2003. "Wettbewerbsföderalismus als Integrationskonzept für die Europäische Union," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(1), pages 43-64, February.
    7. Jan Stankovsky, 2000. "Teilprojekt 1: Institutionelle Rahmenbedingungen für die Osterweiterung der EU," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19146, April.
    8. Viktor Vanberg, 2006. "Globalisation, Democracy and Citizens' Sovereignty: Can Competition Among Governments Enhance Democracy?," Chapters, in: Kartik Roy & Jörn Sideras (ed.), Institutions, Globalisation and Empowerment, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Jääskelä, Jarkko, 1997. "Incomplete insurance market and its policy implication within European Monetary Union," Research Discussion Papers 8/1997, Bank of Finland.
    10. M. Mar㈠& M. Sarcinelli, 1994. "The European Union: how to assign the functions of government," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 47(191), pages 341-377.
    11. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2002. "Manager honesty and foreign investment in developing countries," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 231-250, September.
    12. Gerling, Katja, 1997. "East-west corporate networking: A theoretical approach," Kiel Working Papers 805, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Wilfried Altzinger & Peter Egger & Peter Huber & Kurt Kratena & Michael Pfaffermayr & Michael Wüger, 2000. "Teilprojekt 5: Transnationale Direktinvestitionen und Kooperationen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19587, April.
    14. Jääskelä, Jarkko, 1997. "Incomplete insurance market and its policy implication within European Monetary Union," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 8/1997, Bank of Finland.
    15. Cremer, Helmuth & Pestieau, Pierre, 2002. "Factor Mobility and Redistribution: A Survey," IDEI Working Papers 154, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse, revised 2003.
    16. Hans Pitlik, 2005. "Folgt die Steuerpolitik in der EU der Logik des Steuerwettbewerbs," Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim 256/2005, Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Germany.
    17. Friedrich Heinemann, 2000. "Does globalization restrict budgetary autonomy?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 35(6), pages 288-298, November.
    18. Panu Poutvaara, 2004. "Public Education in an Integrated Europe: Studying to Migrate and Teaching to Stay?," CESifo Working Paper Series 1369, CESifo.
    19. Heinemann, Friedrich, 1999. "Does globalization restrict budgetary autonomy? A multidimensional approach," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-29, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Kellermann, Kersten & Schlag, Carsten-Henning, 2012. "Small, Smart, Special: Der Mikrostaat Liechtenstein und sein Budget," KOFL Working Papers 13, Konjunkturforschungsstelle Liechtenstein (KOFL), Vaduz.
    21. Daumann Frank, 2000. "Müssen die nationalen Krankenversicherungssysteme in der EU harmonisiert werden?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 51(1), pages 435-456, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:52:y:2001:i:1:p:215-238:n:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.