IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v1y2003i1p3n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fox and the Hedgehog: Myopia About Homeland Security in U.S. Policies on Terrorism

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell James K

    (Rutgers University)

Abstract

Following the disasters of 9/11/01 the US government has embarked on what is intended to be a comprehensive response to the hazard of further terrorist attacks on Americans at home and abroad. This paper addresses the homeland component of the response and asserts that both the general approach and the measures being deployed are neither comprehensive nor well-balanced. The broad goal of security is losing ground to the narrower objective of defense; mitigation strategies are being overshadowed by preparedness and response alternatives; expert systems are preferred over grass-roots bottom-up ones; and possibilities for reducing human vulnerability are being ignored in favor of programs that aim to reduce risks or lessen the vulnerability of built structures and infrastructures. Preferences for the use of sophisticated technologies that are intended to quarantine terrorism and minimize its consequences far outnumber efforts to engage with the messier realm of ideas and behaviors related to terrorism. Yet it is the latter that shape the public interpretation of terrorism risks, structure patterns of exposure and affect the coping capabilities of threatened communities. Without substantial changes to policy that take account of these deficiencies, Americans are likely to find themselves little better prepared to confront the challenges of future terrorist attacks on targets in US territory and the nation's ability to address other kinds of hazards may be seriously compromised.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell James K, 2003. "The Fox and the Hedgehog: Myopia About Homeland Security in U.S. Policies on Terrorism," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-3, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:1:y:2003:i:1:p:3:n:1
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1000
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James K. Mitchell, 2006. "The Primacy of Partnership: Scoping a New National Disaster Recovery Policy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 604(1), pages 228-255, March.
    2. Pete Simi & Steven Windisch, 2020. "The Culture of Violent Talk: An Interpretive Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:1:y:2003:i:1:p:3:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.