IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbvela/v12y2017is1p9n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Austrian Economics, Market Process, and the EVA® Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Cachanosky Nicolás

    (Department of Economics, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Campus Box 77, P.O. Box 173362, Denver, CO 80217, USA)

Abstract

In this paper I present a financial framework, known as Economic Value Added or EVA®, used to value firms and apply it to topics highlighted in the Austrian literature. In particular I contrast the market process emphasis in the Austrian literature with the neoclassical firm profit maximization and the role of Kirzner’s entrepreneurial alertness. Then I show how these micro topics can be aggregated into macro issues such as the Cantillon Effect, an aggregate average period of production, and the impact of country risk into value creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cachanosky Nicolás, 2017. "Austrian Economics, Market Process, and the EVA® Framework," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 12(s1), pages 1-9, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:12:y:2017:i:s1:p:9:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/jbvela-2016-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2016-0014
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbvela-2016-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avi J. Cohen, 2003. "Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 199-214, Winter.
    2. Cohen, Avi J., 2010. "Capital Controversy From Böhm-Bawerk To Bliss: Badly Posed Or Very Deep Questions? Or What “We” Can Learn From Capital Controversy Even If You Don'T Care Who Won," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Braun, Eduard & Lewin, Peter & Cachanosky, Nicolás, 2016. "Ludwig von Mises's approach to capital as a bridge between Austrian and institutional economics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 847-866, December.
    4. Steven Horwitz, 2010. "Kirznerian Entrepreneurship as a Misesian Solution to a Hayekian Problem," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 25(Spring 20), pages 97-103.
    5. Michael Osborne, 2014. "Four Key Results of Multiple-Interest-Rate Analysis," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Multiple Interest Rate Analysis: Theory and Applications, chapter 3, pages 12-42, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. N. Cachanosky & P. Lewin, 2014. "Roundaboutness is Not a Mysterious Concept: A Financial Application to Capital Theory," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 648-665, October.
    7. Robert Dorfman, 1959. "Waiting and the Period of Production," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 73(3), pages 351-372.
    8. Fritz Machlup, 1935. "Professor Knight and the "Period of Production"," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(5), pages 577-577.
    9. Michael Osborne, 2014. "Multiple-Interest-Rate Analysis: What It Is and Why It Is Important," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Multiple Interest Rate Analysis: Theory and Applications, chapter 1, pages 1-8, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Osborne, Michael J., 2005. "On the computation of a formula for the duration of a bond that yields precise results," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 161-183, February.
    11. Michael Osborne, 2014. "Multiple-Interest-Rate Analysis Sheds Light on the Reswitching Phenomenon," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Multiple Interest Rate Analysis: Theory and Applications, chapter 7, pages 92-104, Palgrave Macmillan.
    12. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2014. "What is capital? Economists and sociologists have changed its meaning: should it be changed back?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(5), pages 1063-1086.
    13. Cohen, Avi J., 2008. "The Mythology Of Capital Or Of Static Equilibrium? The Böhm-Bawerk/Clark Controversy," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 151-171, June.
    14. Peter Boettke, 2014. "Entrepreneurship, and the entrepreneurial market process: Israel M. Kirzner and the two levels of analysis in spontaneous order studies," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 27(3), pages 233-247, September.
    15. Peter J. Boettke (ed.), 2010. "Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12822.
    16. Michael Osborne, 2014. "Multiple Interest Rate Analysis: Theory and Applications," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-37277-2, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lewin, Peter & Cachanosky, Nicolás, 2018. "Substance and semantics: The question of capital," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 423-431.
    2. William J. Luther, 2021. "Two paths forward for Austrian macroeconomics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 289-297, June.
    3. Nicolás Cachanosky & Alexander W. Salter, 2020. "The super-alertness of central banks," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 187-200, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolás Cachanosky & Peter Lewin, 2018. "The Role of Capital Structure in Austrian Business Cycle Theory," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 33(Summer 20), pages 21-32.
    2. Cachanosky, Nicolás & Lewin, Peter, 2016. "An empirical application of the EVA® framework to business cycles," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 60-67.
    3. Nicolás Cachanosky, 0. "Microfoundations and macroeconomics: 20 years," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 0, pages 1-10.
    4. Nicolás Cachanosky & Peter Lewin, 2016. "Financial Foundations of Austrian Business Cycle Theory," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Studies in Austrian Macroeconomics, volume 20, pages 15-44, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    5. Nicolás Cachanosky, 2021. "Microfoundations and macroeconomics: 20 years," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 279-288, June.
    6. Peter Lewin & Nicolás Cachanosky, 2018. "Value and capital: Austrian capital theory, retrospect and Prospect," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Peter Lewin & Nicolas Cachanosky, 2020. "Entrepreneurship in a theory of capital and finance—Illustrating the use of subjective quantification," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 735-743, July.
    8. William J. Luther & J. P. McElyea, 2018. "Austrian Macroeconomics in Search of Its Uniqueness," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 33(Summer 20), pages 1-20.
    9. Nick Cowen, 2018. "Robust Against Whom?," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Austrian Economics: The Next Generation, volume 23, pages 91-111, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    10. Eduard Braun, 2020. "Capital as in capitalism, or capital as in capital goods, or both?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 383-395, September.
    11. Lewin, Peter & Cachanosky, Nicolás, 2018. "Substance and semantics: The question of capital," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 423-431.
    12. Michael Osborne & Ian Davidson, 2016. "The Cambridge capital controversies: contributions from the complex plane," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 251-269, April.
    13. Dierkes, Thomas & Ortmann, Karl Michael, 2015. "On the efficient utilisation of duration," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 29-37.
    14. Lewin Peter, 2017. "Capital Valuation, What is it and Why does it Matter? Insights from Austrian Capital Theory," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 12(s1), pages 1-19, July.
    15. William J. Luther, 2021. "Two paths forward for Austrian macroeconomics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 289-297, June.
    16. Coyne,Christopher J., 2020. "Defense, Peace, and War Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108724036, October.
    17. Mauricio De Rosa, 2022. "On Capital: an essay on inequality, capital and value theory," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 22-08, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    18. Alexander W. Salter & William J. Luther, 2016. "The Optimal Austrian Business Cycle Theory," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Studies in Austrian Macroeconomics, volume 20, pages 45-60, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    19. Brendan Markey†Towler, 2017. "The Oxford Handbook of Post†Keynesian Economics, Volume 1: Theory and Origins," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(303), pages 659-661, December.
    20. Mazouch, P. & Krejčí, I., 2016. "The Analysis of the Age Structure of Regional Fixed Capital in the Agriculture," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    market process; economic value added; EVA®; financial economics; microfoundations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy
    • E58 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Central Banks and Their Policies
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:12:y:2017:i:s1:p:9:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.