IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v12y2017i2p8n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Universal Basic Income and Helicopter Money

Author

Listed:
  • Mencinger Jože

    (EIPF, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana1000, Slovenia)

Abstract

A unique opportunity for testing whether universal basic income (UBI) on the European level is a realistic option could be provided by its monetary financing as an alternative to “traditional” fiscal financing. Fiscal financing of UBI would namely request a much larger European “federal” budget financed by a specific European tax or by participation of the “federation” on some of the existing tax bases, and by agreed upon allotment of the accumulated “federal” fiscal revenues. Though ensuing redistribution of GDP would be relatively modest, the European UBI without an alternative to the tax revenues requirements remains illusionary. Helicopter money (HM) replacing quantitative easing (QE) might provide such an alternative. Modalities of its implementation differ and the idea raises questions of its compliance with the legal regime of the ECB and opens many other topics such as the effectiveness of “QE for the people” and its long-run consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Mencinger Jože, 2017. "Universal Basic Income and Helicopter Money," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:8:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/bis-2016-0021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0021
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bis-2016-0021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Widerquist, Karl, 2005. "A failure to communicate: what (if anything) can we learn from the negative income tax experiments?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 49-81, February.
    2. Konrad, Kai A. & Zschäpitz, Holger, 2011. "The Future of the Eurozone," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 46-49.
      • Kai A. Konrad & Holger Zschäpitz, 2011. "The Future of the Eurozone," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 12(02), pages 46-49, July.
    3. Joze Mencinger, 2015. "The Revenue Side of a Universal Basic Income in the EU and Euro Area," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 3, pages 159-174, September.
    4. Buiter, Willem H., 2014. "The simple analytics of helicopter money: Why it works - always," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-51.
    5. Gilroy Bernard Michael & Heimann Anastasia & Schopf Mark, 2013. "Basic Income and Labour Supply: The German Case," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 43-70, July.
    6. Galí, Jordi, 2020. "The effects of a money-financed fiscal stimulus," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-19.
    7. Zwolinski Matt, 2012. "Classical Liberalism and the Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Munger Michael C., 2012. "Basic Income Is Not an Obligation, But It Might Be a Legitimate Choice," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Marco Di Maggio & Amir Kermani & Christopher Palmer, 2016. "How Quantitative Easing Works: Evidence on the Refinancing Channel," NBER Working Papers 22638, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joze Mencinger, 2015. "The Revenue Side of a Universal Basic Income in the EU and Euro Area," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 3, pages 159-174, September.
    2. Eiji Okano & Masataka Eguchi, 2024. "The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus in a Small Open Economy," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 72(3), pages 1212-1237, September.
    3. Lukas Altermatt, 2022. "Inside Money, Investment, And Unconventional Monetary Policy," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1527-1560, November.
    4. Sascha Buetzer, 2022. "Advancing the Monetary Policy Toolkit through Outright Transfers," IMF Working Papers 2022/087, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Maarten van Rooij & Jakob de Haan, 2016. "Will helicopter money be spent? New evidence," DNB Working Papers 538, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    6. Fischer Yannick, 2020. "Basic Income, Labour Automation and Migration – An Approach from a Republican Perspective," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 1-034, December.
    7. Maxime Menuet & Alexandru Minea & Patrick Villieu, 2015. "Deficit Rules and Monetization in a Growth Model with Multiplicity and Indeterminacy," Working Papers halshs-01199774, HAL.
    8. Nell, Kevin, 2023. "Inflation and growth in developing economies: A tribute to Professor Thirlwall," MPRA Paper 118757, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Sep 2023.
    9. Grahame Johnson & Sharon Kozicki & Romanos Priftis & Lena Suchanek & Jonathan Witmer & Jing Yang, 2020. "Implementation and Effectiveness of Extended Monetary Policy Tools: Lessons from the Literature," Discussion Papers 2020-16, Bank of Canada.
    10. Agarwal, Samiksha & Chakraborty, Lekha, 2019. "Helicopter Money: A Preliminary Appraisal," MPRA Paper 97897, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Ma, Yong & Lv, Lin, 2022. "Money, debt, and the effects of fiscal stimulus," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 152-178.
    12. Verena Löffler, 2021. "Questioning the feasibility and justice of basic income accounting for migration," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 20(3), pages 273-314, August.
    13. Tumisang Loate & Ekaterina Pirozhkova & Nicola Viegi, 2021. "Sailing into the Wind evaluating the near future of Monetary Policy in South Africa," Working Papers 11006, South African Reserve Bank.
    14. Temperini, Jacopo & D'Ippoliti, Carlo & Gobbi, Lucio, 2024. "Is the time ripe for helicopter money? Growth impact and financial stability risks of outright monetary transfers," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 24-36.
    15. Mao, Ruoyun & Shen, Wenyi & Yang, Shu-Chun S., 2023. "Uncertain policy regimes and government spending effects," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Wang, Shu-Ling, 2021. "Fiscal stimulus in a high-debt economy? A DSGE analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 118-135.
    17. Youngna Choi, 2022. "Economic Stimulus and Financial Instability: Recent Case of the U.S. Household," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Ville-Veikko Pulkka, 2017. "A free lunch with robots – can a basic income stabilise the digital economy?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(3), pages 295-311, August.
    19. Radwanski, Juliusz, 2020. "On the Purchasing Power of Money in an Exchange Economy," MPRA Paper 104244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Kapoor, Supriya & Peia, Oana, 2021. "The impact of quantitative easing on liquidity creation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:8:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.