IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v102y2011i1p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Changing Residential Segregation In Auckland, New Zealand, Using Spatial Statistics

Author

Listed:
  • RON JOHNSTON
  • MICHAEL POULSEN
  • JAMES FORREST

Abstract

Much work on residential segregation in urban areas has focused on aspatial indices of urban residential segregation, largely ignoring locational aspects of the degree of spatial separation of different ethnic groups. The adoption of measures of global and local spatial autocorrelation has recently been suggested as a way of introducing a more explicit spatial approach to studying segregation. This paper uses two of those measures – Moran’s I and Getis and Ord’s G* – to explore segregation of the four main ethnic groups in Auckland, New Zealand’s largest and most multi-ethnic city, at the four most recent censuses held there. They are used to identify the clusters of census reporting units (meshblocks) where each group is significantly over- and under-represented, and to chart the degree of segregation within such clusters.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Johnston & Michael Poulsen & James Forrest, 2011. "Evaluating Changing Residential Segregation In Auckland, New Zealand, Using Spatial Statistics," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 102(1), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:102:y:2011:i:1:p:1-23
    DOI: j.1467-9663.2009.00577.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00577.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1467-9663.2009.00577.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seong-Yun Hong & Yukio Sadahiro, 2014. "Measuring geographic segregation: a graph-based approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 211-231, April.
    2. Richard Harris, 2014. "Measuring Changing Ethnic Separations in England: A Spatial Discontinuity Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(9), pages 2243-2261, September.
    3. David C Maré & Jacques Poot, 2022. "Accounting for social difference when measuring cultural diversity," Working Papers 22_04, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    4. Richard Harris, 2012. "Local Indices of Segregation with Application to Social Segregation between London's Secondary Schools, 2003–08/09," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(3), pages 669-687, March.
    5. Moritz Meister & Annekatrin Niebuhr, 2021. "Comparing ethnic segregation across cities—measurement issues matter," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 41(1), pages 33-54, February.
    6. David C. Maré & Andrew Coleman, 2011. "Estimating the determinants of population location in Auckland," Working Papers 11_07, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    7. David C Maré & Ruth M Pinkerton & Jacques Poot, 2015. "Residential Assimilation of Immigrants: A Cohort Approach," Working Papers 15_20, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    8. David C. Maré & Jacques Poot, 2019. "Commuting to diversity," Working Papers 19_20, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    9. Mohana Mondal & Michael P. Cameron & Jacques Poot, 2021. "Cultural and economic residential sorting of Auckland’s population, 1991–2013: an entropy approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 291-330, April.
    10. Mohana Mondal & Michael P. Cameron & Jacques Poot, 2018. "Group-Size Bias in the Measurement of Residential Sorting," Working Papers in Economics 18/09, University of Waikato.
    11. Lévêque, Christophe & Saleh, Mohamed, 2018. "Does industrialization affect segregation? Evidence from nineteenth-century Cairo," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 40-61.
    12. David C. Maré & Andrew Coleman & Ruth Pinkerton, 2011. "Patterns of population location in Auckland," Working Papers 11_06, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    13. Richard Harris, 2011. "Measuring social segregation between London’s secondary schools, 2003 – 2008/9," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 11/260, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    14. Richard Harris, 2011. "Measuring Segregation a Geographical Tale," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(8), pages 1747-1753, August.
    15. Ignacio C. Fernández & David Manuel-Navarrete & Robinson Torres-Salinas, 2016. "Breaking Resilient Patterns of Inequality in Santiago de Chile: Challenges to Navigate towards a More Sustainable City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Yukio Sadahiro, 2015. "A method for analyzing the segregation between point distributions: statistical tests and consideration of attributes," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 29-60, January.
    17. Eilya Torshizian & Arthur Grimes, 2021. "Household Crowding Measures: A Comparison and External Test of Validity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1925-1951, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:102:y:2011:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.