IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v31y2010i10p1114-1135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Owners on both sides of the deal: mergers and acquisitions and overlapping institutional ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Goranova
  • Ravi Dharwadkar
  • Pamela Brandes

Abstract

Using a corporate governance lens, this study considers owners with a stake in both the acquiring and the target firms in the context of mergers and acquisitions. A possible agency problem arises with regard to monitoring implications as managers may be able to take advantage of compromised monitoring because overlapping owners may focus on the aggregate value for both the acquiring and the target firms and nonoverlapping owners may be interested only in the acquirer's side of the deal. The results suggest that when more owners overlap in their ownership of both the acquiring and target firms, the acquiring firms are more likely to experience decreased shareholder value through merger and acquisition deals. This effect, however, can be constrained by stronger board control. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Goranova & Ravi Dharwadkar & Pamela Brandes, 2010. "Owners on both sides of the deal: mergers and acquisitions and overlapping institutional ownership," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(10), pages 1114-1135, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:31:y:2010:i:10:p:1114-1135
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.849
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tarsalewska, Monika, 2021. "Ownership and cross-border patent sales in M&A transactions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Jana Oehmichen & Sebastian Firk & Michael Wolff & Franz Maybuechen, 2021. "Standing out from the crowd: Dedicated institutional investors and strategy uniqueness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1083-1108, June.
    3. Xin Cheng & Orhun Guldiken & Wei Shi, 2023. "Geographic Concentration of Institutional Blockholders and Workplace Safety Violations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 593-613, September.
    4. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Geoffrey P. Martin & Robert M. Wiseman, 2021. "Stakeholder Agency Relationships: CEO Stock Options and Corporate Tax Avoidance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 782-814, May.
    5. Santiago Kopoboru & Gloria Cuevas-Rodríguez & Leticia Pérez-Calero, 2020. "Boards that Make a Difference in Firm’s Acquisitions: The Role of Interlocks and Former Politicians in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Jindal, Varun & Seth, Rama, 2019. "A new order of financing investments: Evidence from acquisitions by India’s listed firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 307-328.
    7. Maria Goranova & Lori Verstegen Ryan, 2022. "The Corporate Objective Revisited: The Shareholder Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 526-554, March.
    8. Pamela Brandes & Ravi Dharwadkar & Jonathan F. Ross & Linna Shi, 2022. "Time is of the Essence!: Retired Independent Directors’ Contributions to Board Effectiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 767-793, September.
    9. Ryan Federo & Yuliya Ponomareva & Ruth V. Aguilera & Angel Saz‐Carranza & Carlos Losada, 2020. "Bringing owners back on board: A review of the role of ownership type in board governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 348-371, November.
    10. Cho, Hyejin & Ahn, He Soung, 2017. "Stock payment and the effects of institutional and cultural differences: A study of shareholder value creation in cross-border M&As," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 461-475.
    11. Hong Zhu & Qi Zhu, 2016. "Mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms: A review and comparison with other mergers and acquisitions research in the leading journals," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1107-1149, December.
    12. Liu, Hao & Ye, Xiaofen & Zhang, Qun, 2024. "Foreign ownership and M&A activity: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Hou, Wanrong & Li, Sali & Priem, Richard L., 2013. "How do CEOs matter? The moderating effects of CEO compensation and tenure on equity ownership in international joint ventures," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 138-151.
    14. Erin Oldford & Isaac Otchere, 2021. "Institutional cross-ownership, heterogeneous incentives, and negative premium mergers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 321-351, July.
    15. Agyenim Boateng & XiaoGang Bi & Sanjukta Brahma, 2017. "The impact of firm ownership, board monitoring on operating performance of Chinese mergers and acquisitions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 925-948, November.
    16. Fan Xia, 2023. "Common institutional ownership and mergers and acquisitions outcomes," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1429-1449, May.
    17. Shi, Wei & King, David R. & Connelly, Brian L., 2021. "Closing the deal: Managerial response to short sellers following M&A announcement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 188-199.
    18. Hennig, Jan C. & Oehmichen, Jana & Steinberg, Philip J. & Heigermoser, Judith, 2022. "Determinants of common ownership: Exploring an information-based and a competition-based perspective in a global context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 690-702.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:31:y:2010:i:10:p:1114-1135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.