IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v21y2000i7p707-722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of voluntarily disclosed qualitative information

Author

Listed:
  • V. K. Narayanan
  • George E. Pinches
  • Kathryn M. Kelm
  • Diane M. Lander

Abstract

We examine the voluntary disclosure of qualitative information about actions involving governmental agencies and managerial intentions or beliefs in R&D project announcements in The Wall Street Journal. Our analysis indicates that information regarding government approval and managerial intentions/beliefs voluntarily disclosed in R&D project announcements interacts with industry/firm variables to provide significant incremental explanatory power in both the innovation and commercialization stages of R&D projects. Our data also indicate that the biggest impact is from managerial intentions, especially an intent to increase market share when coupled with being a larger firm. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • V. K. Narayanan & George E. Pinches & Kathryn M. Kelm & Diane M. Lander, 2000. "The influence of voluntarily disclosed qualitative information," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(7), pages 707-722, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:21:y:2000:i:7:p:707-722
    DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200007)21:73.0.CO;2-A
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200007)21:73.0.CO;2-A
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1097-0266(200007)21:73.0.CO;2-A?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kelley, Maryellen R., 2006. "The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1509-1521, December.
    2. Avimanyu Datta, 2011. "An Integrative Model to Explain the Ability to Commercialize Innovations: Linking Networks, Absorptive Capacity, Ambidexterity and Environmental Factors," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 2-22, June.
    3. Avimanyu Datta, 2011. "Combining Networks, Ambidexterity and Absorptive Capacity to Explain Commercialization of Innovations: A Theoretical Model from Review and Extension," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(4), pages 2-25, December.
    4. Meuleman, Miguel & De Maeseneire, Wouter, 2012. "Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 580-591.
    5. Mc Namara, Peter & Baden-Fuller, Charles, 2007. "Shareholder returns and the exploration-exploitation dilemma: R&D announcements by biotechnology firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 548-565, May.
    6. Cappa, Francesco & Oriani, Raffaele & Pinelli, Michele & De Massis, Alfredo, 2019. "When does crowdsourcing benefit firm stock market performance?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    7. Pan, Lingling & Li, Xiumei & Chen, Jianhong & Chen, Tianxu, 2020. "Sounds novel or familiar? Entrepreneurs' framing strategy in the venture capital market," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    8. János Kövesi & Tamás Jónás & Zsuzsanna Eszter Tóth, 2010. "Separating the Measurement and Evaluation of Intellectual Capital Elements with Evaluator Functions," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 6(02), pages 37-47.
    9. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2019. "R&D Subsidies and Firms' Debt Financing," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 153, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    10. Wei Dai & Xuefang Zhang & Chaohui Xu, 2022. "The Impacts of Fiscal Subsidies on the Carbon Emissions of Mining Enterprises: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Sarah Demeulemeester & Hanna Hottenrott, 2015. "R&D subsidies and firms' cost of debt," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 516028, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    12. Jianguo Chen & David Smith, 2024. "Disclosure policy choice, stock returns and information asymmetry: Evidence from capital expenditure announcements," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(2), pages 192-213, May.
    13. Grilli, Luca & Murtinu, Samuele, 2018. "Selective subsidies, entrepreneurial founders' human capital, and access to R&D alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1945-1963.
    14. Veer, Theresa & Yang, Philip & Riepe, Jan, 2022. "Ventures' conscious knowledge transfer to close partners, and beyond: A framework of performance, complementarity, knowledge disclosure, and knowledge broadcasting," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3).
    15. Jeffrey Cohen & Lori Holder-Webb & Samer Khalil, 2017. "A Further Examination of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance on Investment Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 203-218, November.
    16. Mohamed, Abdulkadir & Schwienbacher, Armin, 2016. "Voluntary disclosure of corporate venture capital investments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 69-83.
    17. Ma, Guang, 2019. "The information content of operations-related disclosures," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 87-107.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:21:y:2000:i:7:p:707-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.