IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v20y1999i7p671-689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing metric equivalence in cross‐national strategy research: an empirical test across the United States and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • M. Bensaou
  • Michael Coyne
  • N. Venkatraman

Abstract

We propose a conceptual and analytical framework for assessing metric equivalence in cross‐national strategy research. We illustrate this framework by testing the equivalence of measurement models for a set of strategy constructs across the United States and Japan. Results of a two‐group LISREL analysis conducted on a data set of 447 interorganizational relationships reveal that some constructs have strong cross‐national equivalence, while others need content respecification or reconceptualization. We discuss implications and offer suggestions about how to conduct empirical strategy research in cross‐national settings. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Bensaou & Michael Coyne & N. Venkatraman, 1999. "Testing metric equivalence in cross‐national strategy research: an empirical test across the United States and Japan," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 671-689, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:20:y:1999:i:7:p:671-689
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:73.0.CO;2-Z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:73.0.CO;2-Z
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:73.0.CO;2-Z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piercy, Nigel F. & Low, George S. & Cravens, David W., 2011. "Country differences concerning sales organization and salesperson antecedents of sales unit effectiveness," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 104-115, January.
    2. Murtha, Brian R. & Shervani, Tasadduq A. & Challagalla, Goutam N. & Kirkman, Bradley L., 2014. "Control system diversity: Implications for selling centers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1870-1876.
    3. Liehr-Gobbers, Kerstin I. C., 2003. "Determinanten des Legislativen Lobbying in Brüssel: Erste empirische Ergebnisse," Arbeitspapiere 37, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    4. Branzei, Oana & Vertinsky, Ilan & Camp II, Ronald D., 2007. "Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 61-82, September.
    5. Jiatao Li & Deborah R. Yue, 2008. "Market Size, Legal Institutions, and International Diversification Strategies: Implications for the Performance of Multinational Firms," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 667-688, December.
    6. Egelhoff, William & Frese, Erich, 2009. "Understanding managers' preferences for internal markets versus business planning: A comparative study of German and U.S. managers," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 77-91, March.
    7. Karjalainen, Katri & Salmi, Asta, 2013. "Continental differences in purchasing strategies and tools," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 112-125.
    8. Luzzini, Davide & Brandon-Jones, Emma & Brandon-Jones, Alistair & Spina, Gianluca, 2015. "From sustainability commitment to performance: The role of intra- and inter-firm collaborative capabilities in the upstream supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 51-63.
    9. Sue Birley, 2001. "Owner-Manager Attitudes to Family and Business Issues: A 16 Country Study," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(2), pages 63-76, December.
    10. Henrik Franke & Stephanie Eckerd & Kai Foerstl, 2022. "Rising to the Top: Motivational Forces Influencing Status Conflict in Sourcing Teams," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 963-983, March.
    11. Wai-Sum Siu, 2003. "The Applicability of the MACH IV Scale to Banking Executives in Hong Kong, Singapore and Australia: A Research Note," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 150-161, November.
    12. Revilla, Elena & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2014. "Supply chain disruption management: Global convergence vs national specificity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1123-1135.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:20:y:1999:i:7:p:671-689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.