IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v39y2022i3p503-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between inbound open innovation and the innovative use of information technology by individuals in teams of start‐ups

Author

Listed:
  • Meifang Yao
  • Dan Ye
  • Liyi Zhao

Abstract

Digital technology and artificial intelligence technology have built an open sharing environment of intellectualization. For start‐ups, which are restricted by their own limited resources, it is wise to take inbound open innovation as a strategy to get external advanced technical information quickly. However, how to match technology resources obtained from outside with the organisation's demand is still a problem for entrepreneurial teams and entrepreneurial researchers. Based on the literature review of existing research and considering entrepreneurial teams' demand to deal with the challenges, this paper firstly analyses the relationship between entrepreneurial teams' inbound open innovation strategy and the innovative use of information technology by individuals in teams of start‐ups and based on the Identity Theory to explore the mechanism of IT identity on the relationship mentioned above. Lastly, the paper further analyses two types of team authorisation (structural empowerment and psychological empowerment) that play different moderating roles in the relationship of inbound open innovation, IT identity and the innovative use of information technology by individuals in teams. Using 238 survey data from entrepreneurial teams with linear regression analysis, we found that IT identity moderates the relationship between inbound open innovation and individual new IT technology exploration positively, and team psychological empowerment has further moderated the relationship between inbound open innovation and the innovative use of information technology by individuals in teams positively, while team structure empowerment plays an inverted U‐shaped moderation. This study has certain guiding significance for entrepreneurial teams to take advantage of digitalised opportunities, and it also has important value for innovation and digitalisation research.

Suggested Citation

  • Meifang Yao & Dan Ye & Liyi Zhao, 2022. "The relationship between inbound open innovation and the innovative use of information technology by individuals in teams of start‐ups," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 503-515, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:39:y:2022:i:3:p:503-515
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2851
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Jianfeng & Shanley, Mark T., 2009. "Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: Research on the United States electromedical device industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 474-483, April.
    2. Yang Lu, 2019. "Artificial intelligence: a survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Ulrich Lichtenthaler & Eckhard Lichtenthaler, 2009. "A Capability‐Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1315-1338, December.
    4. Li Da Xu, 2021. "Special issue on system research on artificial intelligence," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 187-187, January.
    5. Kuo Chi-Hsien & Shinya Nagasawa, 2019. "Applying machine learning to market analysis: Knowing your luxury consumer," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 404-419, October.
    6. Hong Chen & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2021. "Explore success factors that impact artificial intelligence adoption on telecom industry in China," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 36-68, January.
    7. Weiqiang Zhang & Yidan Xiang & Xiaohui Liu & Pengzhu Zhang, 2019. "Domain ontology development of knowledge base in cardiovascular personalized health management," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 420-455, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sambo Lyson Zulu & Ali M. Saad & Barry Gledson, 2023. "Individual Characteristics as Enablers of Construction Employees’ Digital Literacy: An Exploration of Leaders’ Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Li Da Xu, 2022. "Systems research on artificial intelligence," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 359-360, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baoshan Ge & Liyi Zhao, 2022. "The impact of the integration of opportunity and resources of new ventures on entrepreneurial performance: The moderating role of BDAC‐AI," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 440-461, May.
    2. Baoshan Ge & Qi Wang & Meifang Yao, 2022. "From ideas to entrepreneurial opportunity: A study on AI," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 618-632, May.
    3. Fang Wang, 2022. "AI‐enabled IT capability and organizational performance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 609-617, May.
    4. Jianjing Qu & Yanan Zhao & Yongping Xie, 2022. "Artificial intelligence leads the reform of education models," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 581-588, May.
    5. Xueling Li & Yujie Long & Meixi Fan & Yong Chen, 2022. "Drilling down artificial intelligence in entrepreneurial management: A bibliometric perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 379-396, May.
    6. Yu Sun & Xiaobo Xu & Haiqing Yu & Hecheng Wang, 2022. "Impact of value co‐creation in the artificial intelligence innovation ecosystem on competitive advantage and innovation intelligibility," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 474-488, May.
    7. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.
    8. Weifeng Jia & Shuo Wang & Yongping Xie & Zifeng Chen & Kaixin Gong, 2022. "Disruptive technology identification of intelligent logistics robots in AIoT industry: Based on attributes and functions analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 557-568, May.
    9. Huishuang Su & Xintong Qu & Shuo Tian & Qiang Ma & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2022. "Artificial intelligence empowerment: The impact of research and development investment on green radical innovation in high‐tech enterprises," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 489-502, May.
    10. Yu Zhang, 2022. "The construction of college students' sports health management service platform based on artificial intelligence," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1102-1110, December.
    11. Jing Liu & Mengbo Wang & Xiaoling Kang & Xia Zhang & Xing Chen, 2022. "Seizing the opportunity window of artificial intelligence in China: Towards an innovation policy mix framework for emerging technologies from an evolution perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 397-414, May.
    12. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    13. Su, Hsin-Ning & Moaniba, Igam M., 2017. "Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 12-23.
    14. Ciurea Iulia-Cristina, 2024. "The Impact of the EU AI Act on the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 – A Text Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2857-2870.
    15. Vaidyanathan, Geeta & Sankaranarayanan, Ramani & Yap, Nonita T., 2019. "Bridging the chasm – Diffusion of energy innovations in poor infrastructure starved communities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 243-255.
    16. Yu-Hong Ai & Di-Yun Peng & Huan-Huan Xiong, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Regulation Intensity on Green Technology Innovation: From the Perspective of Political and Business Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Sangsomboon Ploywarin & Yan Song & Dian Sun, 2018. "Research on Factors Affecting Public Risk Perception of Thai High-Speed Railway Projects Based on “Belt and Road Initiative”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Elango, B., 2010. "Influence of industry type on the relationship between international operations and risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 303-309, March.
    19. Waseem Ul Hameed & Muhammad Farhan Basheer & Jawad Iqbal & Ayesha Anwar & Hafiz Khalil Ahmad, 2018. "Determinants of Firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R & D department: an empirical evidence from Malaysian SME’s," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Kafouros, Mario I. & Forsans, Nicolas, 2012. "The role of open innovation in emerging economies: Do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 362-370.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:39:y:2022:i:3:p:503-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.