IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v38y2021i1p137-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Appreciation of Metaphors in Management Consulting from the Conceptual Lens of Holistic Flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Rajneesh Chowdhury

Abstract

Metaphors are popular in human interaction as a means to make relevant associations, convey complex ideas, and even dramatize reality or introduce humour in conversations. Metaphors, if leveraged effectively, can be a powerful tool for management consultants in their client engagement process. Chosen with a sensitive and empathetic rationale, metaphors can not only help fathom highly complex problem situations, they can also bring in an element of light‐heartedness in consulting conversations that may otherwise be stale and unexciting. Metaphorical associations can enable informality, trust, and long‐term engagement between consultants and their clients. This paper presents a first person narrative of how the author has used metaphors as a tool for creative consulting. A reflection is provided on how the experiences narrated in this paper align with the conceptual lens of holistic flexibility introduced by Rajneesh Chowdhury in his latest book on systems thinking for management consultants in 2019.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2021. "An Appreciation of Metaphors in Management Consulting from the Conceptual Lens of Holistic Flexibility," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 137-157, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:38:y:2021:i:1:p:137-157
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2670
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Rosenhead, 1996. "What's the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 117-131, December.
    2. Lahti, Ryan K. & Beyerlein, Michael M., 2000. "Knowledge transfer and management consulting: A look at "The firm"," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 65-74.
    3. Maula, Marjatte & Poulfelt, Flemming, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer, Consulting Modes and Learning Do the Codes of Conduct and Ethics Reflect Reality in Management Consulting?," Working Papers 9/2000, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Parvaneh Aghaei, 2024. "Metaphor research as a research strategy in social sciences and humanities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 227-248, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Chris M. & Shaw, Duncan, 2019. "The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 403-416.
    2. David C. Lane, 2010. "OR FORUM---High Leverage Interventions: Three Cases of Defensive Action and Their Lessons for OR/MS Today," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1535-1547, December.
    3. Sondoss Elsawah & Elena Bakhanova & Raimo P. Hämäläinen & Alexey Voinov, 2023. "A Competency Framework for Participatory Modeling," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 569-601, June.
    4. Vladimir Chernov A. & Anna Tikhova D. & В. Чернов А. & А. Тихова Д., 2018. "Интегрированный менеджмент устойчивого развития: методологические предпосылки и их практическая реализация // The Integrated Management of Sustainable Development: Methodological Prerequisitesand Thei," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, vol. 12(1), pages 92-103.
    5. Miskiewicz, Radoslaw, 2017. "Knowledge transfer in merger and acquisition processes in the metallurgical industry," MPRA Paper 81328, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    6. T Ritchey, 2006. "Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(7), pages 792-801, July.
    7. Jae Hee Park & Ji Hee Kim, 2021. "The Impact of Airport Managerial Type and Airline Market Share on Airport Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. William Jones & Mahesh Sooriyabandara & Mike Yearworth & Angela Doufexi & R. Eddie Wilson, 2016. "Planning For 5G: A Problem Structuring Approach for Survival in the Telecoms Industry," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 301-321, July.
    9. Konsti-Laakso, Suvi & Rantala, Tero, 2018. "Managing community engagement: A process model for urban planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1040-1049.
    10. Ion Georgiou & Joaquim Heck & Andrej Mrvar, 2019. "The Analysis of Interconnected Decision Areas: A Computational Approach to Finding All Feasible Solutions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 543-563, June.
    11. Leonid Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov, 2017. "Management Consulting for Technological Modernization and Industry of the Future," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 204-215.
    12. Phi, Giang & Dredge, Dianne & Whitford, Michelle, 2014. "Understanding conflicting perspectives in event planning and management using Q method," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 406-415.
    13. F O'Brien & M Meadows, 2007. "Developing a visioning methodology: Visioning Choices for the future of operational research," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(5), pages 557-575, May.
    14. Bindu Gupta & Sahil Joshi & Mohit Agarwal, 2012. "The Effect of Expected Benefit and Perceived Cost on Employees’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Study of IT Employees in India," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 3(1).
    15. Michael Yearworth & Gordon Edwards, 2014. "On the Desirability of Integrating Research Methods into Overall Systems Approaches in the Training of Engineers: Analysis Using SSM," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 47-66, January.
    16. Small, Adrian & Wainwright, David, 2018. "Privacy and security of electronic patient records – Tailoring multimethodology to explore the socio-political problems associated with Role Based Access Control systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 344-360.
    17. Annielli Cunha & Danielle Morais, 2019. "Problem structuring methods in group decision making: a comparative study of their application," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1081-1100, December.
    18. L A Franco, 2007. "Assessing the impact of problem structuring methods in multi-organizational settings: an empirical investigation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(6), pages 760-768, June.
    19. Robert Fildes & John Ranyard, 2000. "Internal OR Consulting: Effective Practice in a Changing Environment," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 34-50, October.
    20. Jae-Nam Lee & Minh Q. Huynh & Rudy Hirschheim, 2008. "An integrative model of trust on IT outsourcing: Examining a bilateral perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 145-163, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:38:y:2021:i:1:p:137-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.