IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scotjp/v42y1995i1p20-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There a Case for Post Keynesian Economics?

Author

Listed:
  • Chick, Victoria

Abstract

The charges laid against post-Keynesian economics range from finding it difficult to identify except by its rejection of neoclassical economics, unscientific, old-fashioned, 'not theory,' even 'not economics.' These criticisms reveal strong assumptions about what 'proper' economic theory is and how it is to proceed as well as reflecting an outmoded view of science. The basic principles of post-Keynesian economics are elaborated, through which the methodological nature of the criticisms become apparent. The final section outlines several distinctive and important contributions of post-Keynesian economics. Copyright 1995 by Scottish Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Chick, Victoria, 1995. "Is There a Case for Post Keynesian Economics?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 42(1), pages 20-36, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:42:y:1995:i:1:p:20-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Lavoie, 2001. "Endogenous Money in a Coherent Stock-Flow Framework," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_325, Levy Economics Institute.
    2. Malcolm Sawyer, 2020. "The past, present and future of evolutionary macroeconomics," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 37-54, May.
    3. Giuseppe Fontana & Andrea Pacella & Riccardo Realfonzo, 2017. "Does fiscal policy affect the monetary transmission mechanism? A monetary theory of production (MTP) response to the new consensus macroeconomics (NCM) perspective," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 378-395, May.
    4. Cuauhtémoc CALDERON & L. HERNANDEZ BIELMA, 2006. "L'offre monétaire au Mexique," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 889, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    5. Marc Lavoie & Wynne Godley, 2000. "Kaleckian Models of Growth in a Stock-Flow Monetary Framework: A Neo-Kaldorian Model," Macroeconomics 0004049, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Yannis Panagopoulos & Aristotelis Spiliotis, 2006. "Testing Money Supply Endogeneity: The Case of Greece (1975-1998)," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1-2), pages 85-102.
    7. Giuseppe Fontana & Bill Gerrard, 2006. "The future of Post Keynesian economics," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 59(236), pages 49-80.
    8. Costa, Leopoldo & Teixeira, Joanilio Rodolpho, 2018. "Structural change with different consumption profiles in a pure labour economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 28-34.
    9. Geoff Tily, 2023. "Victoria Chick's Keynes in Time," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(5), pages 1296-1330, September.
    10. Annina Kaltenbrunner, 2018. "Financialised internationalisation and structural hierarchies: a mixed-method study of exchange rate determination in emerging economies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(5), pages 1315-1341.
    11. Finn Olesen, 2013. "Teaching macroeconomics: seeking inspiration from Paul Davidson," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 8, pages 134-149, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Ivan V. Rozmainsky, 2015. "Investor myopia and persistence of the global crisis- a post Keynesian view," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 11(1), pages 107-116.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:42:y:1995:i:1:p:20-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.