IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rmgtin/v6y2003i2p131-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postmodernism: The Basis of Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Brian J. Glenn

Abstract

Insurance practices are often depicted as being based on objective, “scientific” knowledge, and informed by carefully modeled rational actor theories that are embedded in clearly written contracts. This article seeks to displace these notions with a more realistic account. From underwriting, to the creation of actuarial tables, the structuring of programs, and contract analysis, insurance practices are predicated on stories of risk and responsibility. By acknowledging and examining these stories, we come to a greater understanding of why insurance practices take the various forms that they do, and also realize the potential for changing them in ways that are more profitable for the companies and more inclusive and protective for the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian J. Glenn, 2003. "Postmodernism: The Basis of Insurance," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 131-143, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:6:y:2003:i:2:p:131-143
    DOI: J.1098-1616.2003.028.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1098-1616.2003.028.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/J.1098-1616.2003.028.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John D. Long, 2001. "Postmodernism: A Threat to Insurance?," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 4(2), pages 11-24, September.
    2. Tom Baker, "undated". "Insurance and the Law," University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers uconn_ucwps-1004, University of Connecticut School of Law.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurence Barry & Arthur Charpentier, 2022. "The Fairness of Machine Learning in Insurance: New Rags for an Old Man?," Papers 2205.08112, arXiv.org.
    2. Hugh Morris, 2012. "Financial Exclusion and Australian Domestic General Insurance: The Impact of Financial Services Reforms," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 3-2012, January-A.
    3. Hugh Morris, 2012. "Financial Exclusion and Australian Domestic General Insurance: The Impact of Financial Services Reforms," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 33, July-Dece.
    4. William Lesch & Johannes Brinkmann, 2011. "Consumer Insurance Fraud/Abuse as Co-creation and Co-responsibility: A New Paradigm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 17-32, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leigh Johnson, 2013. "Index Insurance and the Articulation of Risk-Bearing Subjects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2663-2681, November.
    2. Ashton, John K. & Hudson, Robert S., 2017. "The price, quality and distribution of mortgage payment protection insurance: A hedonic pricing approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 242-255.
    3. Andrea Pontiggia & Lala Hu & Marco Savorgnan, 2013. "ChinaÕs Human Resources Development: Recent Evolution and Implications for the Global Market," Working Papers 29, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    4. Wang, Yuwei & Chen, Chia-wei, 2016. "Directors' and officers' liability insurance and the sensitivity of directors' compensation to firm performance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 286-297.
    5. Park, Min, 2018. "What drives corporate insurance demand? Evidence from directors' and officers' liability insurance in Korea," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 235-257.
    6. Marc A. Ragin & Benjamin L. Collier & Johannes G. Jaspersen, 2021. "The effect of information disclosure on demand for high‐load insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 161-193, March.
    7. Mohammad Rahmati & David A. Hyman & Bernard Black & Charles Silver, 2016. "Insurance Crisis or Liability Crisis? Medical Malpractice Claiming in Illinois, 1980–2010," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 183-204, June.
    8. Chen Chun-Yuan, 2018. "Reassessing Accountability and Sophistication of Insured in Insurance Misrepresentation: Lessons and Implications for Taiwan," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, December.
    9. McFall, Liz, 2015. "Is digital disruption the end of health insurance? Some thoughts on the devising of risk," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(1), pages 32-44.
    10. Nguyen, Nam H. & Phan, Hieu V. & Lee, Eunju, 2020. "Shareholder litigation rights and capital structure decisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Audrey Verdier‐Chouchane & Karagueuzian Charlotte, 2016. "Working Paper 239 - Concept and measure of inclusive health across countries," Working Paper Series 2347, African Development Bank.
    12. Christian Helmers & Yassine Lefouili & Brian J Love & Luke McDonagh, 2021. "The Effect of Fee Shifting on Litigation: Evidence from a Policy Innovation in Intermediate Cost Shifting," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 56-99.
    13. William Lesch & Johannes Brinkmann, 2011. "Consumer Insurance Fraud/Abuse as Co-creation and Co-responsibility: A New Paradigm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 17-32, April.
    14. Luigi Alberto Franzoni, 2016. "Correlated Accidents," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 358-384.
    15. Zhiyan Cao & Ganapathi Narayanamoorthy, 2005. "The Effect of Litigation Risk on Management Earnings Forecasts," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2379, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Feb 2009.
    16. Arthur Charpentier & Laurence Barry & Molly R. James, 2022. "Insurance against natural catastrophes: balancing actuarial fairness and social solidarity," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(1), pages 50-78, January.
    17. Koch, Christoffer & Okamura, Ken, 2019. "Why does the FDIC sue?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 255-275.
    18. MacLeod, W. Bentley, 2011. "Great Expectations: Law, Employment Contracts, and Labor Market Performance," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 18, pages 1591-1696, Elsevier.
    19. Lawrence A. Berger, 2003. "Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Postmodern Perspective on Why Ethics Matters," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 123-129, September.
    20. Bernard Black & David A. Hyman & Charles Silver, 2010. "O'Connell Early Settlement Offers: Toward Realistic Numbers and Two‐Sided Offers," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 379-401, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:6:y:2003:i:2:p:131-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1098-1616 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.