IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v15y2023i2p425-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring rural community place assessment through mobility and social media data in Fort Gaines, Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Fernandez
  • Yang Song
  • Shirin Rezaeimalek
  • Katherine Melcher
  • Donnie Longnecker

Abstract

In community design efforts, the analysis of public stakeholders' perceptions and usage of community places can inform decisions affecting the built environment. However, accessing this information can be problematic, especially in rural areas where residents are mostly hard‐to‐reach groups. For the site analysis process for a rural town, this study implements mobile application data to explore visitation patterns and social media data to understand the perspectives of residents. Findings reveal the importance of particular community spaces which might have been overlooked through traditional approaches. The study shares how Big Data can be incorporated into site analysis to benefit underserved communities. En las iniciativas de diseño comunitario, el análisis de las percepciones y el uso de los lugares de la comunidad por las partes interesadas públicas puede informar la toma de decisiones que afecten al entorno construido. Sin embargo, el acceso a esta información puede ser problemático, sobre todo en las zonas rurales, donde los residentes son en su mayoría grupos de difícil acceso. Para el proceso de análisis de sitio de una ciudad rural, este estudio utiliza datos de aplicaciones móviles para estudiar los patrones de visitas y datos de redes sociales para comprender las perspectivas de los residentes. Los resultados revelan la importancia de determinados espacios comunitarios que podrían haberse pasado por alto con los enfoques tradicionales. El estudio muestra cómo pueden incorporarse los macrodatos al análisis de sitios para beneficiar a las comunidades desfavorecidas. コミュニティデザインの取り組みにおいては、公共の利害関係者の認識とコミュニティ施設の立地の使用法の分析により、構築環境に影響を与える決定を知ることができる。しかし、こうした情報へのアクセスは、特に住民のほとんどが遠隔地の集団である農村地域では、問題となる可能性がある。本研究では、田舎町の立地分析のプロセスにおいて、訪問パターンを探索するためにモバイルアプリのデータと、住民の視点を理解するためにソーシャルメディアデータを使用する。知見から、従来のアプローチでは見過ごされていた可能性がある特定のコミュニティスペースの重要性が明らかになった。本研究から、十分なサービスを受けていないコミュニティに利益をもたらすために、ビッグデータをどのようにサイト分析に組み込めばよいかが示された。

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Fernandez & Yang Song & Shirin Rezaeimalek & Katherine Melcher & Donnie Longnecker, 2023. "Exploring rural community place assessment through mobility and social media data in Fort Gaines, Georgia," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 425-446, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:425-446
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12655
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dobis, Elizabeth A. & Krumel, Thomas P. & Cromartie, John & Conley, Kelsey L. & Sanders, Austin & Ortiz, Ruben, 2021. "Rural America at a Glance: 2021 Edition," USDA Miscellaneous 316344, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Jenny Stewart & Shirley Lithgow, 2015. "Problems and prospects in community engagement in urban planning and decision-making: three case studies from the Australian Capital Territory," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 18-34, January.
    3. Yang Song & Jessica Fernandez & Tong Wang, 2020. "Understanding Perceived Site Qualities and Experiences of Urban Public Spaces: A Case Study of Social Media Reviews in Bryant Park, New York City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Nicole Darnall & G. Jason Jolley, 2004. "Involving the Public: When Are Surveys and Stakeholder Interviews Effective?1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 21(4), pages 581-593, July.
    5. Yiqiao Chen & Elisabete A. Silva & José P. Reis, 2021. "Measuring policy debate in a regrowing city by sentiment analysis using online media data: A case study of Leipzig 2030," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 675-692, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendt, Jody S. & Briggeman, Brian C. & Bergtold, Jason S. & Shanoyan, Aleksan & Low, Sarah A., 2022. "A Skills Gap Analysis in Farmer Directors of Midwest Agricultural Cooperatives," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322270, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Qureshi, Salman & Tarashkar, Mahsa & Matloobi, Mansour & Wang, Zhifang & Rahimi, Akbar, 2022. "Understanding the dynamics of urban horticulture by socially-oriented practices and populace perception: Seeking future outlook through a comprehensive review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Hongxu Guo & Zhuoqiao Luo & Mengtian Li & Shumin Kong & Haiyan Jiang, 2022. "A Literature Review of Big Data-Based Urban Park Research in Visitor Dimension," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Sarah A. Low & Mallory L. Rahe & Andrew J. Van Leuven, 2023. "Has COVID‐19 made rural areas more attractive places to live? Survey evidence from Northwest Missouri," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 520-540, April.
    5. Emrullah Erul & Kyle Maurice Woosnam & Tara J. Denley, 2022. "Modelling Residents’ Perspectives of Tourism Opposition in US Counties with the Highest Historical Numbers of Reported COVID-19 Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Joanna Burger & Michael Gochfeld, 2009. "Changes in Aleut Concerns Following the Stakeholder‐Driven Amchitka Independent Science Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(8), pages 1156-1169, August.
    7. Elizabeth A. Mack & Scott Loveridge & Thomas Keene & John Mann, 2024. "A Review of the Literature About Broadband Internet Connections and Rural Development (1995-2022)," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 47(3), pages 231-292, May.
    8. Raluca Ignat & Marius Constantin, 2020. "Multidimensional Facets of Entrepreneurial Resilience during the COVID-19 Crisis through the Lens of the Wealthiest Romanian Counties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Kyle Maurice Woosnam & Emrullah Erul & Zachary A. Russell & Sabrina Rahman & Chase Perren & Michael Lefavi & Camille Bennett, 2023. "Social Distance with Tourists in U.S. Counties with the Highest Historical Numbers of Reported COVID-19 Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Gabriele Zabelskyte & Nadja Kabisch & Zaneta Stasiskiene, 2022. "Patterns of Urban Green Space Use Applying Social Media Data: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Antonio Javier Prado-Domínguez & Fernando González-Laxe & Manuel Escourido-Calvo & Federico Martín-Bermúdez, 2021. "Initial Impact and Socioeconomic Compensation for the Closure of a Coal-Fired Power Plant in a Local Entity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Ivan Paunovic & Cathleen Müller & Klaus Deimel, 2023. "Citizen Participation for Sustainability and Resilience: A Generational Cohort Perspective on Community Brand Identity Perceptions and Development Priorities in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Chenghao Yang & Tongtong Liu, 2022. "Social Media Data in Urban Design and Landscape Research: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Worley, Julian M. & Banks, William B & Secor, William & Benjamin L. Campbell, Benjamin L, 2024. "Awareness and Usage of Extension and Outreach Programs," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(4), January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:425-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.