IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v68y2020ics0301420720300374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation in the global mining sector and the case of Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Fernandez, Viviana

Abstract

Recent research has highlighted the upsurge of innovation activity in the mining sector since the early 2000's. By following this research thread, this article contributes to the extant literature by: (i) discussing global innovation trends in the mining sector on the basis of R&D expenditure and patent families; and, (ii) modeling specific obstacles to innovate in the mining sector of Chile, a country with sizeable mineral rents/GDP (i.e., 9.4% average over 1970–2017). The main findings show that, despite the fact that Latin America & the Caribbean accounted for only 1% of worldwide mining patent families during 1970–2018, Chile has become more active in exploration and environmental innovation since 2011. On the other hand, a factor analysis performed on Chile 10th Survey of Innovation in Business (SIB) shows that mining and the remaining economic sectors differ as to how innovation barriers are perceived. Specifically, the mining sector sees cooperation, knowledge, financial, and regulatory obstacles of high importance as one single category, while the remaining sectors see a much weaker association between regulatory impediments and/lack of insufficient cooperation, knowledge and financial funds. A robustness check is conducted on the basis of previous versions of the SIB.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandez, Viviana, 2020. "Innovation in the global mining sector and the case of Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:68:y:2020:i:c:s0301420720300374
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420720300374
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Boldrin & David K. Levine, 2013. "The Case against Patents," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 3-22, Winter.
    2. Yuriy Gorodnichenko & Monika Schnitzer, 2013. "Financial Constraints And Innovation: Why Poor Countries Don'T Catch Up," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(5), pages 1115-1152, October.
    3. Stubrin, Lilia, 2017. "Innovation, learning and competence building in the mining industry. The case of knowledge intensive mining suppliers (KIMS) in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 167-175.
    4. Fleming, Lee & Sorenson, Olav, 2001. "Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1019-1039, August.
    5. Bartos, Paul J., 2007. "Is mining a high-tech industry: Investigations into innovation and productivity advance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 149-158, December.
    6. Wellalage, Nirosha Hewa & Fernandez, Viviana, 2019. "Innovation and SME finance: Evidence from developing countries," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Minyuan Zhao, 2006. "Conducting R& D in Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights Protection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(8), pages 1185-1199, August.
    8. Oxley, Joanne E., 1999. "Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 283-309, March.
    9. Galia, Fabrice & Legros, Diego, 2004. "Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1185-1199, October.
    10. Gilbert, Richard J & Newbery, David M G, 1982. "Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(3), pages 514-526, June.
    11. Gruenhagen, Jan Henrik & Parker, Rachel, 2020. "Factors driving or impeding the diffusion and adoption of innovation in mining: A systematic review of the literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Pietrobelli, Carlo & Marin, Anabel & Olivari, Jocelyn, 2018. "Innovation in mining value chains: New evidence from Latin America," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viviana Fernandez, 2021. "Cross-country concentration and specialization of mining inventions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6715-6759, August.
    2. Balci, Mehmet & Kumral, Mustafa, 2022. "Building an innovation strategy and culture on the structural characteristics of the mining industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Fernandez, Viviana, 2021. "Patenting trends in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Ediriweera, Amali & Wiewiora, Anna, 2021. "Barriers and enablers of technology adoption in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Ortiz, Rodrigo & Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Business perception of obstacles to innovate: Evidence from Chile with pseudo-panel data analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Yamashita, Andre S. & Fujii, Hidemichi, 2022. "Trend and priority change of climate change mitigation technology in the global mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Valeriy Kryukov & Anatoliy Tokarev, 2022. "Spatial trends of innovation in the Russian oil and gas sector: What does patent activity in Siberia and the Arctic reflect?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 127-146, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Innovative intensity in the mining industry: Evidence from patent families," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Ediriweera, Amali & Wiewiora, Anna, 2021. "Barriers and enablers of technology adoption in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Pereira Cabral, Bernardo & Lage de Sousa, Filipe & Canêdo-Pinheiro, Mauricio, 2020. "Assessing the impacts of innovation barriers: a qualitative analysis of Brazil's natural resources industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Kashan, Alireza Javanmardi & Lay, Janine & Wiewiora, Anna & Bradley, Lisa, 2022. "The innovation process in mining: Integrating insights from innovation and change management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Ortiz, Rodrigo & Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Business perception of obstacles to innovate: Evidence from Chile with pseudo-panel data analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Bronwyn Hall & Christian Helmers & Mark Rogers & Vania Sena, 2014. "The Choice between Formal and Informal Intellectual Property: A Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(2), pages 375-423, June.
    7. Gruenhagen, Jan Henrik & Cox, Stephen & Parker, Rachel, 2022. "An actor-oriented perspective on innovation systems: Functional analysis of drivers and barriers to innovation and technology adoption in the mining sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Bronwyn H. Hall & Christian Helmers & Mark Rogers & Vania Sena, 2012. "The Choice between Formal and Informal Intellectual Property: A Literature Review," NBER Working Papers 17983, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Beatriz Calzada Olvera, 2022. "Innovation in mining: what are the challenges and opportunities along the value chain for Latin American suppliers?," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(1), pages 35-51, March.
    10. Balci, Mehmet & Kumral, Mustafa, 2022. "Building an innovation strategy and culture on the structural characteristics of the mining industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Danai Christopoulou & Nikolaos Papageorgiadis & Chengang Wang & Georgios Magkonis, 2021. "IPR Law Protection and Enforcement and the Effect on Horizontal Productivity Spillovers from Inward FDI to Domestic Firms: A Meta-analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 235-266, April.
    12. Muhammad Arif & Mudassar Hasan & Ahmed Shafique Joyo & Christopher Gan & Sazali Abidin, 2020. "Formal Finance Usage and Innovative SMEs: Evidence from ASEAN Countries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    13. García-Quevedo, José & Segarra-Blasco, Agustí & Teruel, Mercedes, 2018. "Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 127-140.
    14. Norbäck Pehr-Johan & Olofsson Charlotta & Persson Lars, 2020. "Acquisitions for Sleep," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Abderazak Bakhouche, 2022. "Assessing the Innovation-finance Nexus for SMEs: Evidence from the Arab Region (MENA)," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 1875-1895, September.
    16. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2015. "Leaders and followers: Perspectives on the Nordic model and the economics of innovation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 3-16.
    17. Feng Zhang & Guohua Jiang, 2019. "Combination of Complementary Technological Knowledge to Generate “Hard to Imitate” Technologies," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Carlo Capuano & Iacopo Grassi, 2019. "Imperfect patent protection, licensing, and Social Welfare," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2639-2649.
    19. Sinziana Dorobantu & Kate Odziemkowska, 2017. "Valuing Stakeholder Governance: Property Rights, Community Mobilization, and Firm Value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(13), pages 2682-2703, December.
    20. Sarath Balachandran & Exequiel Hernandez, 2019. "Do Institutional Reforms Perpetuate or Mitigate the Matthew Effect? Intellectual Property Rights and Access to International Alliances," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 151-174, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:68:y:2020:i:c:s0301420720300374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.