IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v41y2024i6p860-864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy processes in authoritarian settings

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Schlaufer
  • Annemieke van den Dool

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Schlaufer & Annemieke van den Dool, 2024. "Policy processes in authoritarian settings," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 860-864, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:41:y:2024:i:6:p:860-864
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12634
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annemieke van den Dool & Caroline Schlaufer, 2024. "Policy process theories in autocracies: Key observations, explanatory power, and research priorities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 865-891, November.
    2. Angelo Vito Panaro, 2024. "Policy convergence in authoritarian regimes: A comparative analysis of welfare state trajectories in post‐Soviet countries," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 1017-1043, November.
    3. Caroline Schlaufer & Marina Pilkina & Tatiana Chalaya & Tatiana Khaynatskaya & Tatiana Voronova & Aleksandra Pozhivotko, 2022. "How do civil society organizations communicate in an authoritarian setting? A narrative analysis of the Russian waste management debate," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 730-751, November.
    4. Andreas Thiel & Nora Schütze & Annabelle Buhrow & Ayoub Fouzai, 2024. "State infrastructural power in a neopatrimonialist democratization context: Why Tunisian sustainable land management fails," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 985-1016, November.
    5. Tatiana Chalaya & Artem Uldanov, 2024. "Avoiding the blame game: NGOs and government narrative strategies in landscape fire policy debates in Russia," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 892-920, November.
    6. Vera Axyonova, 2024. "Responding to crises in authoritarian environments: Russian think tanks between policy evaluation and state endorsement," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 941-960, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Fouad El Haddad, 2024. "Beyond regulatory capture: Policy entrepreneurs' strategies in regulatory policies under authoritarianism," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 961-984, November.
    2. Tatiana Chalaya & Artem Uldanov, 2024. "Avoiding the blame game: NGOs and government narrative strategies in landscape fire policy debates in Russia," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 892-920, November.
    3. Nils C. Bandelow & Johanna Hornung, 2022. "Narratives, evidence and public policy in crisis situations," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 704-707, November.
    4. Andreas Thiel & Nora Schütze & Annabelle Buhrow & Ayoub Fouzai, 2024. "State infrastructural power in a neopatrimonialist democratization context: Why Tunisian sustainable land management fails," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 985-1016, November.
    5. Annemieke van den Dool & Caroline Schlaufer, 2024. "Policy process theories in autocracies: Key observations, explanatory power, and research priorities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 865-891, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:41:y:2024:i:6:p:860-864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.