IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v40y2023i6p1144-1168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the roles of regional and local climate governance discourse and actors? Mediated climate change policy networks in Atlantic Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Mark C. J. Stoddart
  • Yixi Yang

Abstract

As a global problem with diverse local and regional impacts, climate change is an inherently multilevel issue. Focusing on Atlantic Canada, we examine regional‐local dimensions of Canadian climate politics, drawing on data from six legacy newspapers (two national outlets, four regional outlets). Claims about the importance of provincial governments and municipalities have low levels of media visibility and are more salient in regional news outlets. However, federal, provincial, local government and political party sources articulate the ideas that regional and local actors have important roles to play in climate action. While these ideas are not highly visible, they are diffuse and high consensus across multilevel political, civil society, and other actors. Articulations of the importance of regional and local climate governance tend to connect this with issues of carbon pricing and other economic dimensions of climate governance. While a few municipal actors are highly visible in the mediated policy network, local policy actors tend to receive little visibility in either national or regional media spheres. By contrast, regional actors from provincial governments and political parties are among the top tier of actors in both national and provincial media. Our analysis highlights the significance of regional political arenas and actors that have received less attention than national governments or municipalities as sites of climate governance. Como problema global con diversos impactos locales y regionales, el cambio climático es un problema inherentemente multinivel. Centrándonos en el Atlántico canadiense, examinamos las dimensiones regionales y locales de la política climática canadiense, a partir de datos de seis periódicos heredados (dos medios nacionales, cuatro medios regionales). Los reclamos sobre la importancia de los gobiernos provinciales y municipales tienen bajos niveles de visibilidad en los medios y son más destacados en los medios regionales. Sin embargo, las fuentes del gobierno federal, provincial, local y de los partidos políticos articulan las ideas de que los actores regionales y locales tienen un papel importante que desempeñar en la acción climática. Si bien estas ideas no son muy visibles, son difusas y tienen un alto consenso entre los actores políticos, la sociedad civil y otros actores de varios niveles. Las articulaciones sobre la importancia de la gobernanza climática regional y local tienden a conectar esto con cuestiones de tarificación del carbono y otras dimensiones económicas de la gobernanza climática. Mientras que unos pocos actores municipales son muy visibles en la red de políticas mediadas, los actores de políticas locales tienden a recibir poca visibilidad en las esferas de los medios nacionales o regionales. Por el contrario, los actores regionales de los gobiernos provinciales y los partidos políticos se encuentran entre los actores de primer nivel en los medios tanto nacionales como provinciales. Nuestro análisis destaca la importancia de los escenarios y actores políticos regionales que han recibido menos atención que los gobiernos nacionales o los municipios como lugares de gobernanza climática. 作为一个具有多样化的地方影响和区域影响的全球性问题,气候变化本质上是一个多层问题。聚焦于加拿大大西洋地区,我们利用来自六家传统报纸(两家全国性媒体,四个区域性媒体)的数据,研究了加拿大气候政治的区域‐地方维度。关于省政府和市政府重要性的声明在媒体上的曝光度较低,并在区域新闻媒体中更为突出。不过,联邦层面、省层面、地方政府层面和政党层面的信息来源阐明了观点,即区域和地方行动者在气候行动中发挥重要作用。尽管这些观点不是很明显,但它们在多层次的政治、公民社会及其他行动者中具有扩散性并达成高度共识。关于区域和地方气候治理重要性的阐述往往将其与碳定价问题以及气候治理的其他经济维度相联系。虽然一些市政行动者在受调节的政策网络中具有高度可见性,但地方政策行动者往往在国家或区域媒体领域中不受到关注。相比之下,来自省政府和政党的区域行动者在国家媒体和省级媒体中都是最高一级的行动者。我们的分析强调了区域政治舞台和行动者的重要性,这些政治舞台和行动者作为气候治理场所而受到的关注少于国家政府或市政当局。

Suggested Citation

  • Mark C. J. Stoddart & Yixi Yang, 2023. "What are the roles of regional and local climate governance discourse and actors? Mediated climate change policy networks in Atlantic Canada," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1144-1168, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:40:y:2023:i:6:p:1144-1168
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12510
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathryn Harrison, 2013. "Federalism and Climate Policy Innovation: A Critical Reassessment," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 39(s2), pages 95-108, August.
    2. Lorien Jasny & Joseph Waggle & Dana R. Fisher, 2015. "An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 782-786, August.
    3. Robert S. Wood & Andy Hultquist & Rebecca J. Romsdahl, 2014. "An Examination of Local Climate Change Policies in the Great Plains," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 31(6), pages 529-554, November.
    4. Dana Fisher & Philip Leifeld & Yoko Iwaki, 2013. "Mapping the ideological networks of American climate politics," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 523-545, February.
    5. Simon Schaub & Florence Metz, 2020. "Comparing Discourse and Policy Network Approaches: Evidence from Water Policy on Micropollutants," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 184-199.
    6. Ondřej Černý & Petr Ocelík, 2020. "Incumbents’ Strategies in Media Coverage: A Case of the Czech Coal Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 272-285.
    7. Elizabeth Schwartz, 2019. "Autonomous Local Climate Change Policy: An Analysis of the Effect of Intergovernmental Relations Among Subnational Governments," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 36(1), pages 50-74, January.
    8. Lorien Jasny & Joseph Waggle & Dana R. Fisher, 2015. "Correction: Corrigendum: An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 1020-1020, November.
    9. Taedong Lee & Chris Koski, 2012. "Building Green: Local Political Leadership Addressing Climate Change," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 29(5), pages 605-624, September.
    10. Rachel M. Krause, 2012. "An Assessment of the Impact that Participation in Local Climate Networks Has on Cities’ Implementation of Climate, Energy, and Transportation Policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 29(5), pages 585-604, September.
    11. Adam C. Howe & Mark C. J. Stoddart & David B. Tindall, 2020. "Media Coverage and Perceived Policy Influence of Environmental Actors: Good Strategy or Pyrrhic Victory?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 298-310.
    12. Susanne C. Moser, 2016. "Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 345-369, May.
    13. Jonathan Craft & Michael Howlett, 2013. "Policy Capacity and the Ability to Adapt to Climate Change: C anadian and U . S . Case Studies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Christopher D. Gore, 2010. "The Limits and Opportunities of Networks: Municipalities and Canadian Climate Change Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(1), pages 27-46, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melanie Nagel & Marlene Kammerer, 2023. "Tackling climate change on the local level: A growing research agenda," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 846-852, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanesa Castán Broto & Linda K. Westman, 2020. "Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    2. Taedong Lee & Chris Koski, 2015. "Multilevel governance and urban climate change mitigation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1501-1517, December.
    3. Philip Leifeld, 2020. "Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis: A Research Agenda," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 180-183.
    4. Richard Thomas Watson & Kirk Plangger & Leyland Pitt & Amrit Tiwana, 2023. "A Theory of Information Compression: When Judgments Are Costly," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1089-1108, September.
    5. Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, Rafaela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Burns, Georgette Leah & Ross, Helen & Biggs, Duan, 2024. "‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Dana R. Fisher & Philip Leifeld, 2019. "The polycentricity of climate policy blockage," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 469-487, August.
    7. Mijailoff, Julián Daniel & Burns, Sarah Lilian, 2023. "Fixing the meaning of floating signifier: Discourses and network analysis in the bioeconomy policy processes in Argentina and Uruguay," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Katharina Momsen & Markus Ohndorf, 2023. "Expressive voting versus information avoidance: experimental evidence in the context of climate change mitigation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 45-74, January.
    9. Kozitsin, Ivan V., 2024. "Optimal control in opinion dynamics models: diversity of influence mechanisms and complex influence hierarchies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Denghang Chen & Yanlong Guo & Chenyang Wang & Yinrui Xu & Han Zhang, 2022. "Dispersion and Disparity: Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Research on Climate Change Science Communication," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Kai Schulze & Jonas J. Schoenefeld, 2023. "Measuring climate change adaptation policy output: Toward a two‐dimensional approach," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1058-1092, November.
    12. Phelps, Jacob & Zabala, Aiora & Daeli, Willy & Carmenta, Rachel, 2021. "Experts and resource users split over solutions to peatland fires," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    13. Taedong Lee & Sara Hughes, 2017. "Perceptions of urban climate hazards and their effects on adaptation agendas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 761-776, June.
    14. Momsen, Katharina & Ohndorf, Markus, 2022. "Information avoidance, selective exposure, and fake (?) news: Theory and experimental evidence on green consumption," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Anmol Soni & Justina Jose & Gordon A. Kingsley, 2023. "When cities take control: Explaining the diversity of complex local climate actions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1026-1057, November.
    16. Thibaud Deguilhem & Juliette Schlegel & Jean-Philippe Berrou & Ousmane Djibo & Alain Piveteau, 2024. "Too many options: How to identify coalitions in a policy network?," Post-Print hal-04689665, HAL.
    17. Saffron O’Neill & Roz Pidcock, 2021. "Introducing the Topical Collection: ‘Climate change communication and the IPCC’," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-7, December.
    18. Alexandre Morin-Chassé & Erick Lachapelle, 2020. "Partisan strength and the politicization of global climate change: a re-examination of Schuldt, Roh, and Schwarz 2015," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 31-40, March.
    19. Vandenhole, Kimberley & Garic, Kristijan & Leifeld, Philip, 2023. "Detection of Phase Transitions in Discourse Networks of Sustainability Transitions," SocArXiv 7f5x6, Center for Open Science.
    20. Melanie Nagel & Marlene Kammerer, 2023. "Tackling climate change on the local level: A growing research agenda," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 846-852, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:40:y:2023:i:6:p:1144-1168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.