IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v26y2009i4p423-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disasters, Catastrophes, and Policy Failure in the Homeland Security Era1

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas A. Birkland

Abstract

The September 11 attacks triggered federal policy changes designed to influence emergency management in the United States, even though these attacks did not suggest a need for a wholesale restructuring of federal policy in emergency management. Instead, for several reasons, federal policy's emphasis on terrorism and emergency management significantly degraded the nation's ability to address natural disasters. The federal government sought to create a top‐down, command and control model of emergency management that never fully accounted for, positively or normatively, the way local emergency management works in practice. The Obama administration will have to address the questions raised by the reorganization of federal emergency management responsibilities. While the context in which these changes have occurred is unique to the U.S. federal system, there are interesting implications for emergency management in nonfederal systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas A. Birkland, 2009. "Disasters, Catastrophes, and Policy Failure in the Homeland Security Era1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(4), pages 423-438, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:4:p:423-438
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00393.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00393.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00393.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyoo‐Man Ha, 2016. "Facilitating Redundancy‐Oriented Management with Gene‐Therapy‐Oriented Management Against Disaster," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(6), pages 1262-1276, June.
    2. Stefania Ravazzi, 2023. "Beyond plans, governance structures, and organizational strategies: how emotional mechanisms can make a difference in emergency response processes," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(3), pages 499-523, September.
    3. Olavarria-Gambi Mauricio, 2017. "Policy Implementation: Lessons from the Chilean Policy on Public Management Modernization," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 41-54, June.
    4. Špačková Zuzana & Špaček David, 2020. "Using Game Theory in Public Domains: The Potential and Limitations of Security Games," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 249-272, December.
    5. Lei Du & Yingbin Feng & Li Yaning Tang & Wei Kang & Wei Lu, 2020. "Networks in disaster emergency management: a systematic review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1-27, August.
    6. McDonald, Bruce D. III & Goodman, Christopher B & Hatch, Megan E., 2020. "Tensions in State-Local Intergovernmental Response to Emergencies: The Case of COVID-19," OSF Preprints cnzt6, Center for Open Science.
    7. Nabil Kamel, 2012. "Social Marginalisation, Federal Assistance and Repopulation Patterns in the New Orleans Metropolitan Area following Hurricane Katrina," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3211-3231, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:4:p:423-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.