IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v69y2023i4p886-906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributional national accounts for the Netherlands and a comparison with 12 other countries

Author

Listed:
  • Arjan Bruil

Abstract

Most inequality studies rely on micro data that do not capture a substantial share of income identified in the national accounts. In the Netherlands, almost one fifth of household disposable income is missed by current inequality statistics. In this paper, we present inequality statistics for the Netherlands that capture all of household income, so‐called distributional national accounts. Compared to the current inequality statistics, the Gini coefficient for disposable income increases substantially from 0.289 to 0.337. Cross‐country comparisons show that such a change between Gini coefficients based on micro‐data versus Gini coefficients based on distributional national accounts does not apply to all countries. The difference between both Gini coefficients varies not only between countries in the size, but also in the sign of the difference.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjan Bruil, 2023. "Distributional national accounts for the Netherlands and a comparison with 12 other countries," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(4), pages 886-906, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:69:y:2023:i:4:p:886-906
    DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12609
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roiw.12609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Facundo Alvaredo & Anthony Atkinson & Lucas Chancel & Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2016. "Distributional National Accounts (DINA) Guidelines : Concepts and Methods used in WID.world," Working Papers halshs-02794308, HAL.
    2. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2018. "Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(2), pages 553-609.
    3. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2019. "Simplified Distributional National Accounts," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 289-295, May.
    4. Emanuela Raffinetti & Elena Siletti & Achille Vernizzi, 2015. "On the Gini coefficient normalization when attributes with negative values are considered," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(3), pages 507-521, September.
    5. repec:bla:revinw:v:32:y:1986:i:3:p:245-76 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Maryse Fesseau & Maria Liviana Mattonetti, 2013. "Distributional Measures Across Household Groups in a National Accounts Framework: Results from an Experimental Cross-country Exercise on Household Income, Consumption and Saving," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2013/4, OECD Publishing.
    7. Jorrit Zwijnenburg & Sophie Bournot & David Grahn & Emmanuelle Guidetti, 2021. "Distribution of household income, consumption and saving in line with national accounts: Methodology and results from the 2020 collection round," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2021/01, OECD Publishing.
    8. Giovanni D'Alessio & Andrea Neri, 2015. "Income and wealth sample estimates consistent with macro aggregates: some experiments," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 272, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    9. Richard Ruggles & Nancy D. Ruggles, 1986. "The Integration Of Macro And Micro Data For The Household Sector1," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 32(3), pages 245-276, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arjan Bruil (CBS) & Céline van Essen & Wouter Leenders & Arjan Lejour & Jan Möhlmann & Simon Rabaté, 2022. "Inequality and Redistribution in the Netherlands," CPB Discussion Paper 436, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Stefan Jestl & Emanuel List, 2023. "Inequality, Redistribution, and the Financial Crisis: Evidence from Distributional National Accounts for Austria," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(1), pages 195-227, March.
    3. Christian Awuku-Budu & Dirk van Duym, 2022. "Developing Statistics on the Distribution of State Personal Income: Methodology and Preliminary Results," BEA Working Papers 0197, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    4. Arun Advani, 2022. "Who does and doesn't pay taxes?," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 5-22, March.
    5. Stefan Ederer & Stefan Humer & Stefan Jestl & Emanuel List, 2020. "Distributional National Accounts (DINA) with Household Survey Data. Methodology and Results for European Countries," WIFO Working Papers 599, WIFO.
    6. Luis Estévez Bauluz, 2017. "Revised and extended national wealth series: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the USA," PSE Working Papers halshs-02797842, HAL.
    7. Advani, Arun & Summers, Andy & Tarrant, Hannah, 2020. "Measuring UK top incomes," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 490, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    8. Yonatan Berman, 2022. "The Long-Run Evolution of Absolute Intergenerational Mobility," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 61-83, July.
    9. Luis Bauluz & Filip Novokmet & Moritz Schularick, 2022. "The Anatomy of the Global Saving Glut," Working Papers halshs-03693216, HAL.
    10. Filip Novokmet & Thomas Piketty & Gabriel Zucman, 2018. "From Soviets to oligarchs: inequality and property in Russia 1905-2016," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(2), pages 189-223, June.
    11. Anthony B. Atkinson & Alessandra Casarico & Sarah Voitchovsky, 2018. "Top incomes and the gender divide," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(2), pages 225-256, June.
    12. Advani, Arun, 2021. "The taxation of capital gains : principles, practice, and directions for reform," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1379, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    13. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2019. "Simplified Distributional National Accounts," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 289-295, May.
    14. J.-M. Germain, 2020. "A Welfare Based Estimate of “Real Feel GDP” for Europe and the USA," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2020-03, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    15. Pawel Bukowski & Filip Novokmet, 2019. "Between Communism and Capitalism: Long-Term Inequality in Poland, 1892- 2015," World Inequality Lab Working Papers hal-02876995, HAL.
    16. Gerald Auten & David Splinter, 2019. "Top 1 Percent Income Shares: Comparing Estimates Using Tax Data," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 307-311, May.
    17. Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret, 2019. "Inégalités de revenus et de richesse en France : évolutions et liens sur longue période," Working Papers halshs-02401482, HAL.
    18. Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2020. "Trends in US Income and Wealth Inequality: Revising After the Revisionists," Working Papers halshs-03022102, HAL.
    19. Laura A. Harvey & Jochen O. Mierau & James Rockey, 2024. "Inequality in an Equal Society," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(4), pages 871-904, August.
    20. Thomas Piketty & Li Yang & Gabriel Zucman, 2019. "Capital Accumulation, Private Property, and Rising Inequality in China, 1978–2015," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(7), pages 2469-2496, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:69:y:2023:i:4:p:886-906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.