IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v12y2004i4p689-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adam Smith and Noneconomic Objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Elmslie

Abstract

This note looks at Smith's critiques of bounties (read “subsidies”) on exports. Smith's analysis of bounties foreshadowed the basic trade policy framework of distortions and noneconomic objectives. While Smith did not develop the theory of distortions, he captured the logic of the theory of noneconomic objectives and actually ranked policy alternatives based upon their relative social costs. Corden (1957) first ranked tariffs versus production subsidies within a noneconomic objectives framework, and Johnson (1960) first used the term in its modern sense, but the formulation of the general framework lies with Smith.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Elmslie, 2004. "Adam Smith and Noneconomic Objectives," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(4), pages 689-692, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:12:y:2004:i:4:p:689-692
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00475.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00475.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00475.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jagdish Bhagwati & Arvind Panagariya & T. N. Srinivasan, 1998. "Lectures on International Trade, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262522470, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruce Elmslie, 2004. "Adam Smith's Analysis of Bounties as an Early Example of the Concept of Noneconomic Objectives," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 899-910, October.
    2. Andrea Maneschi, 2004. "Noneconomic Objectives in the History of Economic Thought," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 911-920, October.
    3. Martin Stephen & Valbonesi Paola, 2008. "Equilibrium State Aid in Integrating Markets," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-39, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Lake & Maia Linask, 2015. "Costly distribution and the non-equivalence of tariffs and quotas," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 211-238, December.
    2. Boggio, Luciano, 2009. "Long-run effects of low-wage countries' growing competitiveness and exports of manufactures," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 38-49, March.
    3. Haufler, Andreas & Pflüger, Michael, 2003. "Market structure and the taxation of international trade," Discussion Papers in Economics 106, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    4. P. Sai-wing Ho, 2004. "Myrdal’s Backwash and Spread Effects in Classical Economics: Implications for Multilateral Trade Negotiations," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 537-544, June.
    5. Anwar, Sajid, 2005. "Specialisation-based external economies, supply of primary factors and government size," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 259-271.
    6. Howell H. Zee, 2007. "Export taxes in times of trade surpluses," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 137-157.
    7. Fernando MESA PARRA, 2001. "Strategic Trade Policy and Exchange Rate Uncertainty," Archivos de Economía 3527, Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
    8. Giovanni Facchini, 2004. "The political economy of international trade and factor mobility," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, February.
    9. Todd Sanderson & Fredoun Z. Ahmadi‐Esfahani, 2009. "Testing Comparative Advantage in Australian Broadacre Agriculture Under Climate Change: Theoretical and Empirical Models," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 346-354, December.
    10. Xin Zhao & Gregmar I. Galinato & Tim A. Graciano, 2019. "The Welfare Effects of Opening to Foreign Direct Investment in Polluting Sectors," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 243-269, September.
    11. repec:lan:wpaper:3064 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Billette de Villemeur, Etienne & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2010. "Environmentally damaging electricity trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1548-1558, March.
    13. Yasuyuki Sawada, 2009. "The immiserizing growth: an empirical evaluation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(13), pages 1613-1620.
    14. Sisira Jayasuriya, 2007. "Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence ‐ by Robert C. Feenstra," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 83(261), pages 238-240, June.
    15. Conconi, P., 2000. "Trade Bloc Formation Under Imperfect Competition," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 571, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    16. Davies, Ronald B. & Shea, Paul, 2010. "Adaptive learning with a unit root: An application to the current account," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 179-190, February.
    17. Beladi, Hamid & Chao, Chi-Chur & Hazari, Bharat R. & Laffargue, Jean-Pierre, 2009. "Tourism and the environment," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 39-49, January.
    18. Nilabja Ghosh, 2003. "Impact of Trade Liberalization on Returns from Land: A Regional Study of Indian Agriculture," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-50, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Afontsev Serguey, 2002. "Endogenous Tariff Protection and the Level of Trade Distortions in Russia," EERC Working Paper Series 01-07e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    20. Basak, Suleyman & Pavlova, Anna, 2002. "A Dynamic Model with Import Quota Constraints," CEPR Discussion Papers 3414, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    21. David Greenaway & Douglas Nelson, 2010. "The Politics of (Anti-)Globalization: What do we Learn from Simple Models?," Chapters, in: Noel Gaston & Ahmed M. Khalid (ed.), Globalization and Economic Integration, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:12:y:2004:i:4:p:689-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.