IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v28y2024i2p544-573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reassessing the relationship between women's empowerment and fertility: Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Nayana Bose
  • Shreyasee Das

Abstract

An overwhelming body of evidence supports a negative relationship between women's empowerment and fertility. In this paper, we evaluate whether this relationship holds in a setting with a high degree of son preference and limited access to abortion services by focusing on rural India. We exploit the reforms to the Hindu Succession Act that improved female empowerment by mandating equal inheritance rights for women to assess the reform's impact on women's fertility. Using NFHS‐3 data and a difference‐in‐differences estimation, our results show that women who benefitted from the reform had more children than their counterparts. We attribute this increase in fertility to women's ability to use the stopping rule to achieve son preference. Finally, women impacted by the reform had a higher proportion of sons for a given family size, indicating stronger inherent son preference among treated women.

Suggested Citation

  • Nayana Bose & Shreyasee Das, 2024. "Reassessing the relationship between women's empowerment and fertility: Evidence from India," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 544-573, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:544-573
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13066
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:544-573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.