IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/presci/v23y1969i1p65-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applicability And Limitations In The Use Of National Input‐Output Tables For Regional Studies

Author

Listed:
  • STANISLAW CZAMANSKI
  • EMIL E. MALIZIA

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanislaw Czamanski & Emil E. Malizia, 1969. "Applicability And Limitations In The Use Of National Input‐Output Tables For Regional Studies," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 65-78, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:23:y:1969:i:1:p:65-78
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1969.tb01400.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1969.tb01400.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1969.tb01400.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David F. Batten, 1982. "The Interregional Linkages between National and Regional Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 7(1), pages 53-67, May.
    2. Elias Giannakis, 2010. "An input-output approach in assessing the impact of extensive versus intensive farming systems on rural development: the case of Greece," Working Papers 2010-01, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Giannakis, Elias & Efstratoglou, Sophia & Psaltopoulos, Demetris, 2014. "Modelling the impacts of alternative CAP scenarios through a system dynamics approach," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20.
    4. Yu, Yang & Hubacek, Klaus & Feng, Kuishuang & Guan, Dabo, 2010. "Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1140-1147, March.
    5. Benjamin H. Stevens & George I. Treyz & David J. Ehrlich & James R. Bower, 1983. "A New Technique for the Construction of Non-Survey Regional Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 271-286, December.
    6. R C Hinojosa, 1978. "A Performance Test of the Biproportional Adjustment of Input—Output Coefficients," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 10(9), pages 1047-1052, September.
    7. Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher & Foran, Barney, 2004. "Energy requirements of Sydney households," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 375-399, July.
    8. Randy F. Cray, 1989. "Estimating the Impact of Higher Electricity Rates on Intersectoral Prices: An Input-Output Approach," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 19(2), pages 18-29, Spring.
    9. Jorge Omar Razo De Anda & Luis Lorenzo Romero Castro & María Alejandra Herrera Pasillas, 2022. "Sectores económicos determinantes para el Estado de Durango. Una aplicación de la Matriz Insumo Producto Regional," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, Enero - M.
    10. Miller, Bill R. & Liu, Peng Li, 1975. "Regional Input-Output Models Adjusted By Import-Export Survey Data," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Xiaoyun Zhao & Sung-Goan Choi, 2015. "On the regionalization of input–output tables with an industry-specific location quotient," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 901-926, May.
    12. K.W. Clements & Y. Qiang, 1998. "A New Input-output Table for Western Australia - Part 2," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 98-16, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    13. Giannakis, Elias & Efstratoglou, Sophia, 2011. "An input-output approach in assessing the CAP reform impact of extensive versus intensive farming systems on rural development: The case of Greece," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(1).
    14. Kim, Ju-Hee & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2021. "Comparison of the economic effects of nuclear power and renewable energy deployment in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Andrea BONFIGLIO, 2005. "Ca Non-survey Methods Substitute for Survey-based Models ? A Performance Analysis of Indirect Techniques of Estimating I-O Coefficients and Multipliers," Working Papers 230, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    16. William H. Miernyk, 1976. "Comments on Recent Developments in Regional Input-Output Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 47-55, October.
    17. Gurgul, Henryk, 2007. "Stochastic input-output modeling," MPRA Paper 68573, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    18. Jeffery I. Round, 1983. "Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 189-212, December.
    19. Dipietre, Dennis & Walker, Rodney L. & Martella, David R., 1980. "Developing Regional Input-Output Models From The U.N. Format Adopted By The U.S. In The New 1972 Input-Output Model," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, July.
    20. Hongli Zhang & Lei Shen & Shuai Zhong & Ayman Elshkaki, 2020. "Economic Structure Transformation and Low-Carbon Development in Energy-Rich Cities: The Case of the Contiguous Area of Shanxi and Shaanxi Provinces, and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    21. Rokicki, Bartlomiej & Fritz, Oliver & Horridge, Mark & Hewings, Geoffrey, 2019. "Survey based versus non survey based Multi-Regional Input-Output Tables – the case of Austria," Conference papers 333115, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:23:y:1969:i:1:p:65-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1056-8190 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.